Following on from my last two questions link text and link text: Is it correct (and useful) to say that the relationship between Connes' cyclic cohomology approach to de Rham cohomology and Woronowicz's differential calculi approach, is a noncommutative generalisation of the difference between ordinary differentials and Kahler differentials respectively?
|
4 | added 12 characters in body | ||
|
|
||||
|
|
3 | added 10 characters in body | ||
|
Following on from my last two questions link text and link text: Is it correct (and useful) to say that the relationship between Connes' cyclic cohomology approach to de Rham cohomology and Woronowicz's differential calculi approach, is a noncommutative generalisation between of the difference between ordinary differentials and Kahler differentials respectively? |
||||
|
|
2 | deleted 3 characters in body | ||
|
Following on from my last two questions link text and link text: Is it correct (and useful) to say that the relationship between Connes' cyclic cohomology approach to de Rham cohomology and the Woronowicz's differential calculi approach, is a noncommutative generalisation between between ordinary differentials and Kahler differentials respectively? |
||||
|
1 |
|
||
