|
3 | added 3 characters in body | ||
|
The Igusa-Waldhausen paper (roughly) entitled, The expansion space model for $Q(X_+)$ which is supposed to give a very different proof of the splitting $A(X) = Q(X_+) \times \text{Wh}^{\text{diff}}(X)$ that is based on a description of $Q(X_+)$ as the moduli space of finite relative cell complexes over $X$. |
||||
|
|
2 | edited body | ||
|
The Igusa-Waldhausen paper (roughly) entitled, " The expansion space model for $Q(X_+)$"Q(X_+)$ which is supposed to give a very different proof of the splitting $A(X) = Q(X_+) \times \text{Wh}^{\text{diff}}(X)$ that based on a description of $A(X)$ has Q(X_+)$ as the "moduli space of finite relative cell complexes over $X$."BlockquoteX$. |
||||
|
|
1 | [made Community Wiki] | ||
|
The Igusa-Waldhausen paper (roughly) entitled, "The expansion space model for $Q(X_+)$" which is supposed to give a very different proof of the splitting $A(X) = Q(X_+) \times \text{Wh}^{\text{diff}}(X)$ based on a description of $A(X)$ has the "moduli space of finite relative cell complexes over $X$."Blockquote |
||||
