4 typesetting

In short, I'd tell your friend: "If you believe a ring can be understood geometrically as functions on a its spectrum, then modules help you by providing more functions with which to measure and characterize these spectra.its spectrum."

Elements of a module over a ring $R$ are like generalized functions on its spectrum. $Spec(R)$. We can talk about the support of a module element, or its vanishing set. More concretely, think of how global sections of a line bundle can act as functions you can use to define map into projective space.

When you glue together a module on open sets of a spectrum or a scheme, you get to glue using maps which are module isomorphisms, which are more flexible than the ring isomorphisms required to glue together a scheme. Borrowing intuition from smooth manifold land, the twist in the Moebius band (as a line bundle on the circle) is formed by gluing a copy of the reals to itself via multiplication by $-1$, a module map, not a ring map. This allows us to think of functions like $\cos(\theta/2)$ as being globally defined: as a map to the Moebius band.

In the same vein, when you have a representation $V$ of a group $G$, each element $v\in V$ gives you a nice evaluation map from $G$ into $V$, so lurking everywhere we've got these morphisms from our object of interest into a known object, which are nicely related to each other via the group laws. A fortiori, this certainly doesn't capture the full utility of group representations, but a priori I think it's a decent justification.

3 wording

In short, I'd tell your friend: "If you believe rings a ring can be understood geometrically as functions on a spectrum, then modules help you by providing more functions with which to measure and characterize these spectra."

Elements of a module over a ring are like generalized functions on its spectrum. We can talk about the support of a module element, or its vanishing set. More concretely, think of how global sections of a line bundle can act as functions you can use to define map into projective space.

When you glue together a module on open sets of a spectrum or a scheme, you get to glue using maps which are module isomorphisms, which are more flexible than the ring isomorphisms required to glue together a scheme. Borrowing intuition from smooth manifold land, the twist in the Moebius band (as a line bundle on the circle) is formed by gluing a copy of the reals to itself via multiplication by -1, $-1$, a module map, not a ring map, which . This allows us to think of functions like $\cos(\theta/2)$ as being globally defined: as a map to the Moebius band.

In the same vein, when you have a representation $V$ of a group $G$, each element $v\in V$ gives you a nice evaluation map from $G$ into $V$, so lurking everywhere we've got these morphisms from our object of interest into a known object, which are nicely related to each other via the group laws. A fortiori, this certainly doesn't capture the full utility of group representations, but a priori I think it's a decent justification.

2 typesetting

I think geometry provides a good reason

In short, I'd tell your friend: elements "If you believe rings can be understood geometrically as functions on a spectrum, then modules help you by providing more functions with which to measure and characterize these spectra."

Elements of a module over a ring are like generalized functions on its spectrum. We can talk about the support of a module element, or its vanishing set. More concretely, think of how global sections of a line bundle can act as functions mapping your scheme you can use to define map into projective space.

When you glue together a module on open sets of a spectrum or a scheme, you get to glue using maps which are module isomorphisms, which are which are more flexible than the ring isomorphisms required to glue together a scheme. Borrowing intuition from smooth manifold land, the twist in the Moebius band (as a line bundle on the circle) is formed by gluing a copy of the reals to itself via multiplication by -1, a module map, not a ring map, which allows us to think of functions like $\cos(\theta/2)$ as being globally defined: as a map to the Moebius band.

Similarly

In the same vein, when you have a representation V $V$ of a group G, $G$, each element v in V $v\in V$ gives you a nice evaluation map from G $G$ into V, $V$, so again, we're getting lurking everywhere we've got these morphisms from an our object of interest into a known object, which are nicely related to each other via the group laws. A fortiori, this certainly doesn't capture the full utility of group representations, but a priori I think it's a decent justification.

1