Incidentally, you may be interested in the article by
Joseph Malkevitch,
"Milestones in the history of polyhedra,"
which appeared in
Shaping Space: A Polyhedral Approach,
Marjorie Senechal and George Fleck, editors,
pages 80--9280-92. Birkhauser, Boston, 1988.
There he makes the case (following Grünbaum) that there should be 14 Archimedean
solids rather than 13, including the pseudorhombicuboctahedron(!) as the 14th.

|
3 | Added Wikipedia link and image; added 91 characters in body | ||
|
|
||||
|
2 | edited body | ||
|
Incidentally, you may be interested in the article by Joseph Malkevitch, "Milestones in the history of polyhedra," which appeared in Shaping Space: A Polyhedral Approach, Marjorie Senechal and George Fleck, editors, pages 80--92. Birkhauser, Boston, 1988. There he makes the case (following GrunbaumGrünbaum) that there should be 14 Archimedean solids rather than 13, including the pseudorhombicuboctahedron(!) as the 14th. |
||||
|
1 |
|
||
|
Incidentally, you may be interested in the article by Joseph Malkevitch, "Milestones in the history of polyhedra," which appeared in Shaping Space: A Polyhedral Approach, Marjorie Senechal and George Fleck, editors, pages 80--92. Birkhauser, Boston, 1988. There he makes the case (following Grunbaum) that there should be 14 Archimedean solids rather than 13, including the pseudorhombicuboctahedron(!) as the 14th. |
||||

