|
4 | Rollback to Revision 2 | ||
Is there "A gentleman never chooses a basis-free proof that finite dimensional vector spaces are reflexive?basis."Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular. Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is a finite dimensional vector spacedimensionsal? As in life, without choosing the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a basis?bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly pick basesbasis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously free of choicesunambigously gentlemanly. |
||||
|
|
3 | unloaded language | ||
"A gentleman never chooses Is there a basis."basis-free proof that finite dimensional vector spaces are reflexive?Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular. Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is a finite dimensionsal? As in lifedimensional vector space, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are without choosing a bit vague. basis? Some arguments seem to be implicitly pick basisbases. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambigously gentlemanlyunambiguously free of choices. |
||||
|
|
2 | deleted 2 characters in body | ||
|
Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular. Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finitely finite dimensionsal? As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly pick basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambigously gentlemanly. |
||||
|
1 |
|
||
