|
3 |
downcase
|
||
What is the relationship between Modular Forms modular forms and the Rogers-Ramanujan Identitiesidentities? |
||||
|
2 | minor correction | ||
|
Let G(q) be the generating function for partitions such that if k is a part, then it occurs once and k+1 is not a part. Let H(q) be the generating function for partitions with the same condition plus that 1 is not a part. These are the left-hand sides of the Rogers-Ramanujan Identities.
I am intrigued by the following unreferenced statement in the wikipedia page:
|
||||
|
1 |
|
||
What is the relationship between Modular Forms and the Rogers-Ramanujan Identities?Let G(q) be the generating function for partitions such that if k is a part, then it occurs once and k+1 is not a part. Let H(q) be the generating function for partitions with the same condition plus that 1 is not a part. These are the left-hand sides of the Rogers-Ramanujan Identities.
I am intrigued by the following unreferenced statement in the wikipedia page:
|
||||

