|
4 |
edited title
|
||
What's the diffence difference between a real manifold and a smooth variety? |
||||
|
3 | added 34 characters in body | ||
|
I am teaching a course on Riemann Surfaces next term, and would like a list of facts illustrating the difference between the theory of real (differentiable) manifolds and the theory non-singular varieties (over, say, $\mathbb{C}$). I am looking for examples that would be meaningful to 2nd year US graduate students who has taken 1 year of topology and 1 semester of complex analysis. Here are some examples that I thought of: 1. Every $n$-dimensional real manifold embeds in $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$. By contrast, a projective variety does not embed in $\mathbb{A}^n$ for any $n$. Every $n$-dimensional non-singular, projective variety embeds in $\mathbb{P}^{2n+1}$, but there are non-singular, proper varieties that do not embed in any projective space. 2. Suppose that $X$ is a real manifold and $f$ is a smooth function on an open subset $U$. Given $V \subset U$ compactly contained in $U$, then there exists a global function $\tilde{g}$ that agrees with $f$ on $V$ and is identically zero outside of $U$. By contrast, if consider the same set-up when $X$ is a non-singular variety and $f$ is a regular functionon . It may be impossible find a (non-empty) open subset global regular function $U \subset X$g$ that agrees with $f$ on $V$. When $g$ exists, then there it is at most one extension $\tilde{f}$ of unique and (when $f$ to a regular function is non-zero) is not identically zero on outside of $X$. There are examples where no extension exists.U$. 3. If $X$ is a real manifold and $p \in X$ is a point, then the ring of germs at $p$ is non-noetherian. The local ring of a variety at a point is always noetherian. What are some more examples? Answers illustrating the difference between real manifolds and complex manifolds are also welcome. |
||||
|
2 | deleted 77 characters in body | ||
|
I am teaching a course on Riemann Surfaces next term, and would like a list of facts illustrating the difference between the theory of real (differentiable) manifolds and the theory non-singular varieties (over, say, $\mathbb{C}$). I am looking for examples that would be meaningful to 2nd year US graduate students who has taken 1 year of topology and 1 semester of complex analysis. Here are some examples that I thought of: 1. Every $n$-dimensional real manifold embeds in $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$. By contrast, a projective variety does not embed in $\mathbb{A}^n$ for any $n$. Every $n$-dimensional non-singular, projective variety embeds in $\mathbb{P}^{2n+1}$, but there are non-singular, proper varieties that do not embed in any projective space. 2. If Suppose that $X$ is a real manifold and $f$ is a smooth function on an open subset $U U$. Given $V \subset X$, U$ compactly contained in $U$, then there is exists a global function $\tilde{f}$ on $X$ \tilde{g}$ that restricts to agrees with $f$ on $U$. In fact, there many extensions. For example, if $V$ and is a second open subset, $U \subset V$, the function $\tilde{f}$ may be choen to be identically zero outside of $V$. U$. By contrast, if $X$ is a non-singular variety and $f$ is a regular function on a (non-empty) open subset $U \subset X$, then there is at most one extension $\tilde{f}$ of $f$ to a regular function on $X$. There are examples where no extension exists. 3. If $X$ is a real manifold and $p \in X$ is a point, then the ring of germs at $p$ is non-noetherian. The local ring of a variety at a point is always noetherian. What are some more examples? Answers illustrating the difference between real manifolds and complex manifolds are also welcome. |
||||
|
1 | [made Community Wiki] | ||

