|
3 |
"answered" in title
|
||
Is there a "universal group object"? (answered: yes!) |
||||
|
2 | "like limit preserving" | ||
|
I want to say that a group object in a category (e.g. a discrete group, topological group, algebraic group...) is the image under a product-preserving functor of the "group object diagram", D. One problem with this idea is that this diagram D as a category on its own doesn't have enough structure to make the object labelled "GxG" really the product of G with itself in D.
(It's okay with me if "product-preserving" or "up to natural isomorphism" are replaced by some other appropriate qualifiers.qualifiers, like "limit preserving"...) |
||||
|
1 |
|
||
Is there a "universal group object"?I want to say that a group object in a category (e.g. a discrete group, topological group, algebraic group...) is the image under a product-preserving functor of the "group object diagram", D. One problem with this idea is that this diagram D as a category on its own doesn't have enough structure to make the object labelled "GxG" really the product of G with itself in D.
(It's okay with me if "product-preserving" or "up to natural isomorphism" are replaced by some other appropriate qualifiers.)
|
||||

