show/hide this revision's text 2 added 110 characters in body

If Mochizuki's proof of abc is correct, why would this provide a new proof of FLT?

Edit: In proof of asymptotic FLT, does Mochizuki claim a specific value of n and if so what is this value?

    Post Closed as "too localized" by Igor Rivin, Andres Caicedo, Lee Mosher, Vidit Nanda, Steven Gubkin

show/hide this revision's text 1

FLT from Mochizuki's proof of abc

If Mochizuki's proof of abc is correct, why would this provide a new proof of FLT?