I'm not an expert on this so bear with me, but I don't think you must require $\dim(M) = 26$, you must only require that the worldsheet is conformally invariant - i.e., the Weyl anomaly vanishes. You can do this by adding 26 bosons (which represent the coordinates of $M$) - which is called critical string theory - or you can turn on the dilaton expectation value - which is then called non-critical string theory. There's a lot of interesting research on involving these non-critical string theories, for e.g. check out $c=1$ matrix models and type 0 string theories.
|
3 | added 7 characters in body | ||
|
|
||||
|
|
2 | added 6 characters in body; edited body | ||
|
I'm not a physicist an expert on this so bare bear with me, but I don't think you must require $\dim(M) = 26$, you must only require that the worldsheet is conformally invariant - i.e., the Weyl anomaly vanishes. You can do this by adding 26 bosons (which represent the coordinates of $M$) - which is called critical string theory - or you can turn on the dilaton expectation value - which is then called non-critical string theory. There's a lot of interesting research on these non-critical string theories, for e.g. check out $c=1$ matrix models and type 0 string theories. |
||||
|
|
1 |
|
||
|
I'm not a physicist so bare with me, but I don't think you must require $\dim(M) = 26$, you must only require that the worldsheet is conformally invariant - i.e., the Weyl anomaly vanishes. You can do this by adding 26 bosons (which represent the coordinates of $M$) - which is called critical string theory - or you can turn on the dilaton expectation value - which is then called non-critical string theory. There's a lot of interesting research on these non-critical string theories, for e.g. check out $c=1$ matrix models and type 0 string theories. |
||||
