0
votes
1answer
139 views
universal families and maps to quotient stacks
Suppose I have a certain (contravariant) moduli functor $M:Schemes \to Groupoids$ that is represented by a quotient stack $[X//G]$ where $X$ is a scheme and $G$ a linearly reductiv …
3
votes
0answers
69 views
Do generalizations of adjoint functors, such as adjunctions in 2-categories, and multivariable adjunctions, have formulations in terms of something like universal morphisms?
I recently learned about two-variable adjunctions and multi-variable adjunctions, and about adjunctions in 2-categories. The nCatLab page on two-variable adjunctions talks about h …
5
votes
1answer
186 views
universal property of blow up for stacks?
I will use as a reference Hartshorne Prop. II.7.14, the universal property of blow-up. $\tilde{X}$ is the blow up of $X$ along a sheaf of ideals. $Z\to X$ is the morphism that is t …
19
votes
11answers
1k views
Characterizing specific “concrete” mathematical objects by abstract general properties
In this note by Tom Leinster the Banach space $\mathrm{L}^1[0,1]$ is recovered by "abstract nonsense" as the initial object of a certain category of (decorated) Banach spaces. So a …
4
votes
1answer
269 views
Adjoint Functors as Initial Objects of Some Category
Just as universal arrows can be characterized as initial objects of some appropriate comma category, and (co)limits can be characterized as (initial) terminal objects of the approp …
0
votes
0answers
60 views
families over semistable locus of GIT quotient?
This question is somehow a more generalized re-edit of a former question of mine:
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/119339/glueing-flat-families-of-objects-over-a-blow-up
I guess …
5
votes
4answers
713 views
Universal Property of the Smash Product (of pointed spaces)
Hey
Is there a universal property for the smash product (of pointed spaces or pointed CW-complexes or something of that ilk)? I've seen the smash product of spectra defined with …
9
votes
2answers
968 views
Elements in a localization - category theoretic approach
This question is about the elements in a localization $S^{-1} A$ of a commutative ring $A$. Is it possible to derive $\frac{a}{1} = 0 \in S^{-1} A \Rightarrow \exists s \in S : sa …
1
vote
0answers
266 views
When do coproducts commute with filtered projective limits?
Let $C$ be a category with filtered projective limits and coproducts (denoted by $+$). Then for all filtered projective systems $\{X_i\}$, $\{Y_i\}$ in $C$ there is a canonical mor …
4
votes
3answers
429 views
Are schemes pushouts of neighbourhoods and formal neighbourhoods?
Hello,
I have two questions, the first less important.
Let $X$ be a scheme, $x \in X$ a schematic point.
What is an elegant way of defining/characterizing the map $\operatorn …
4
votes
3answers
611 views
universal property of stein factorization
This question has not the ambition of being very precise, instead it is more philosophical.
The question is the following: does the Stein factorization of a morphism have some kin …
0
votes
3answers
930 views
equality of elements in localization via universal property [unsolved!]
I've been studying universal objects of universal algebra in a quite general setting and try to exhibit the structure of their elements just using the universal property. a very ni …
9
votes
4answers
948 views
Completion of the rationals to the reals as an inverse limit construction?
There is of course the standard construction of the reals by considering the set of sequences that are Cauchy with respect to the standard metric and taking the quotient by sequenc …
15
votes
3answers
879 views
Is there a “categorical” description of Grothendieck’s algebra of differential operators?
First, pick a commutative ring $k$ as the "ground field". Everything I say will be $k$-linear, e.g. "algebra" means "unital associative algebra over $k$". Then recall the followi …
7
votes
4answers
1k views
What is the universal property of normalization?
What is the universal property of normalization? I'm looking for an answer something like
If X is a scheme and Y→X is its
normalization, then the morphism
Y→X has …

