The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

5
votes
1answer
119 views

Connes Embedding Conjecture and Fusion Categories

I was recently introduced to Connes' Embedding Conjecture (CEC) which states: Every separable type $II_{1}$ factor is embeddable into $R^{\omega}$. Where $\omega$ is a generic free ultrafilter on ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

Is 6 the smallest index for an irreducible subfactor to have a principal graph with a multiplicity >1 edge?

The irreducible subfactor $(R^{S_3} \subset R)$, of index $6$, admits a principal with a multiplicity $2$ edge because the group $S_3$ admits an irreducible complex representation of dimension $2$. ...
0
votes
0answers
23 views

Is there a non-solvable integral fusion category of square-free dimension?

A finite group of square-free order is solvable (see here). You can find the definition for a solvable fusion category in this paper. Question: Is there a non-solvable integral fusion category of ...
4
votes
0answers
54 views

Is there a perfect integral fusion category with PFdim = 2 mod 4?

A finite group $G$ is perfect if $G = G^{(1)} := \langle [G,G] \rangle$. Proposition: A finite group $G$ is perfect iff any $1$-dimensional complex representation of $G$ is trivial. proof: First if ...
0
votes
1answer
139 views

Chinese remainder theorem for cyclic subfactor planar algebras

This post was inspired by an exchange with the indian woman mathematician Ajit Iqbal Singh. The chinese remainder theorem can be stated as follows: Let $n_1, \dots, n_r \ge 2$ be positive integers ...
0
votes
0answers
46 views

A constraint on the indices of irreducible finite depth subfactors

Let $(A \subset B)$ and $(C \subset D)$ be two finite index finite depth irreducible subfactors. Question: Is it true that $[B:A] \cdot [D:C]$ is an integer iff $[B:A]$ and $[D:C]$ are integers? ...
1
vote
0answers
94 views

On the correspondence sub-N-N-bimodules and 2-box projections

Let $(N \subset M)$ be a finite index irreducible subfactor, and $P = P(N \subset M)$ its planar algebra. We can see $M$ as an algebraic $N$-$N$-bimodule, it decomposes into irreducible algebraic ...
1
vote
0answers
57 views

Examples of non-extremal subfactors

Every subfactor $(N \subset M)$ in this post are supposed to be finite index inclusion of ${\rm II}_1$ factors. Definition (here p64): Such a subfactor is called extremal if $tr_{N'} = tr_M$ on ...
5
votes
1answer
148 views

What's the relation between spin model for subfactors theory and physics?

In the sense of subfactor theory, a spin model is a commuting square of the form $$\begin{matrix} \Delta &\subset & M_n(\mathbb{C})\cr \cup &\ &\cup\cr \mathbb{C} &\subset ...
0
votes
0answers
58 views

The completely reducible bimodules coming from subfactors

This post is a sequel of: Are all the R-R-bimodules completely reducible? Question: For which (as general as possible) class of subfactors $(N \subset M)$, the bimodule $_NM_M$ is known completely ...
0
votes
1answer
75 views

Is the (hyperfinite) TLJ subfactor unique at fixed index (if it exists)?

Let $(N \subset M)$ be an inclusion of hyperfinite ${\rm II}_1$ factors, with the following principal graph (called TLJ) Question: Is such a subfactor unique (up to ${\rm W}^*$-isomorphism) at fixed ...
1
vote
1answer
45 views

Are the two-side TLJ subfactors maximal?

Let $(N \subset M)$ be an inclusion of ${\rm II}_1$ factors, with the following principal graph (called two-side TLJ) Question: Is $(N \subset M)$ a maximal subfactor?
3
votes
0answers
51 views

Is there no extra intermediate subfactor for the basic construction?

Let $(N \subset M)$ be an inclusion of ${\rm II}_1$ factors, the basic construction is $N \subset M \subset M_1 = \langle M , e^M_N \rangle$. Question: For any intermediate subfactor $N \subset P ...
1
vote
0answers
54 views

Are there infinitely many amenable Hadamard-Petrescu subfactors?

The complex Hadamard matrices of dimension $n$ are used to build index $n$ subfactors through the commuting square construction. For more details, see the paper Subfactors and Hadamard Matrices by ...
0
votes
1answer
48 views

A short problem with minimal projections and biprojections

Let $(N \subset M)$ be a finite index irreducible subfactor, $P=P(N \subset M)$ its planar algebra. Notation: For $a,b \in P_{2,+}$ positive operators, then $\langle a,b \rangle$ is the biprojection ...
0
votes
0answers
77 views

How to generalize multiplication and addition to cyclic subfactors?

Let $(N \subset M)$ be a finite index irreducible subfactor and $P=P(N \subset M)$ its subfactor planar algebra. Definition: $(N \subset M)$ is cyclic if its lattice of intermediate subfactors ...
2
votes
0answers
86 views

A process generating series of new subfactors

Consider the following process: Take a maximal finite depth-index irreducible subfactor planar algebra $P^{(1)} = P(A^{(0)} \subset A^{(1)})$. Choose a composition with itself such that there is no ...
1
vote
0answers
32 views

Skein theory: How axiomatizing a 2-box space?

Let $(A,+,\times, *)$ with an adjoint operation compatible with $+$, $\times$ and $*$, such that $(A,+,\times)$ and $(A,+,*)$ are finite dimensional ${\rm C}^{*}$-algebras. What are the axioms on ...
0
votes
1answer
93 views

Is there an irreducible subfactor with an infinite homogeneous single chain lattice?

We know that we can build an irreducible subfactor realizing a finite single chain lattice containing any finite index irreducible maximal subfactors, by using the free composition (see here). Now ...
1
vote
0answers
49 views

Is every irreducible subfactor planar algebra a quotient of the planar algebra of tangles?

Let $\mathcal{T}_{n,\pm}$ be the vector space generated by the planar tangles (up to isomorphism) having $2n$ intervals on their "ouput'' disk and a white (or black) shaded marked interval. Then the ...
2
votes
1answer
75 views

Can any finite lattice with at most six elements be realized as an intermediate subfactor lattice?

The paper Lattices of Intermediate Subfactors of Y. Watatani, received on December 1994, finishes by: Prop. 6.2. $ \ $ Any finite lattice with at most five elements can be realized as an ...
1
vote
0answers
131 views

The planar algebra generated by the biprojections

Let $(N_1 \subset M_1)$ and $(N_2 \subset M_2)$ be two irreducible finite index subfactors. Let $\mathcal{B}_i$ be the set of all the biprojections of $\mathcal{P}_{2+}(N_i \subset M_i)$. Let ...
2
votes
1answer
153 views

Has a subfactor with lattice $B_3$, a singly generated identity biprojection?

Let $(N \subset M)$ be an irreducible finite index subfactor. If its lattice of intermediate subfactors is equivalent to $B_3$ (the lattice of divisors of $n=p_1p_2p_3$ square free): ...
2
votes
0answers
208 views

Is there a non-trivial maximal Hopf algebra?

Let $H$ be a Hopf algebra over an algebraically closed field $\mathbb{K}$ of characteristic $0$. Maximal means without left coideal subalgebra $I$ (i.e. $\Delta(I) \subset H \otimes I$) other than ...
2
votes
1answer
108 views

Is there a tangle encoding the fusion rules?

Let $(N \subset M)$ be an irreducible finite index depth $n$ subfactor. Let $P = P(N \subset M)$ its planar algebra. Let $(B_i)$ be the finite sequence of $N$-$N$-bimodules appearing in the principal ...
1
vote
1answer
102 views

Is there a Frobenius reciprocity for the coproduct?

Let $\mathcal{P}$ be an irreducible finite index-depth subfactor planar algebra. The $2$-boxes space $\mathcal{P}_{2,+}$ is equipped with the coproduct $(a,b) \mapsto a*b = ...
1
vote
1answer
112 views

Is the coproduct of central operators, also central?

Let $\mathcal{P}$ be an irreducible finite index-depth subfactor planar algebra. The $2$-boxes space $\mathcal{P}_{2,+}$ is equipped with the coproduct $(a,b) \mapsto a*b = ...
2
votes
1answer
459 views

Image, kernel, quotient and first isomorphism theorem, in a category of monoid objects

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a monoidal category and Mon$_{\mathcal{C}}$ the category of monoids (also called algebra objects) on $\mathcal{C}$. Questions: are there definitions of image and kernel for a ...
1
vote
0answers
208 views

Is a finite depth-index irreducible subfactor, intermediate of a depth ≤ 3 one?

Let $(N \subset M)$ be a finite depth-index irreducible subfactor. Main question: Is $(N \subset M)$ the intermediate of a finite index depth $\le 3$ irreducible subfactor? (In others words, is ...
3
votes
0answers
97 views

Are the integer index finite depth irreducible subfactors Kac-coideal?

Is it known whether or not the integer index finite depth irreducible subfactors (planar algebra) are Kac-coideal subfactors: $(R^{\mathbb{A}} \subset R^{\mathbb{I}})$, with $\mathbb{A}$ a finite ...
3
votes
0answers
162 views

What are the first non-maximal non-group-subgroup simple irreducible subfactors?

Definition: For an irreducible (finite index) subfactor $(\mathcal{N} \subset \mathcal{M})$, an intermediate $(\mathcal{N} \subset \mathcal{P} \subset \mathcal{M})$ is normal if the biprojections ...
2
votes
0answers
100 views

Uniqueness of the tensor product decomposition of subfactors

A subfactor $(N \subset M)$ is indecomposable if (for $N_i \subset M_i)$: $$(N \subset M) = (N_1 \otimes N_2 \subset M_1 \otimes M_2) \Rightarrow \exists i \ N_i = M_i$$ Then, a subfactor $(N ...
8
votes
2answers
935 views

Generalization of a theorem of Øystein Ore in group theory

Theorem (Øystein Ore, 1938): A finite group $G$ is cyclic iff its lattice of subgroups $\mathcal{L}(G)$ is distributive. Proof: see below. Let $(H \subset G)$ be an inclusion of finite groups and ...
1
vote
3answers
371 views

What's the relation between fusion and coproduct?

For an irreducible finite depth finite index subfactor $(N \subset M)$, there is a structure of fusion category given by the even part of its principal graph. The simple objects $(X_i)_{i \in I}$ of ...
1
vote
1answer
151 views

The coproduct on the 2-boxes space of the group-subgroup subfactor planar algebras

Let $(H \subset G)$ be an inclusion of finite groups. Let the subfactor $(\mathcal{R} \rtimes H \subset \mathcal{R} \rtimes G)$ with $\mathcal{R}$ the hyperfinite ${\rm II}_1$ factor, and its planar ...
3
votes
0answers
263 views

What's the ratio of inclusions of finite groups with a distributive lattice?

Definition: Two inclusions of finite groups are equivalent, $(A \subset B) \sim (C \subset D)$, if: $(A/A_B \subset B/A_B) \simeq (C/C_D \subset D/C_D)$ with $A_B$ the normal core of $A$ in $B$. ...
1
vote
1answer
163 views

Infinite amenable group subfactors

Let amenable groups $\Gamma$ and $\Gamma'$. They act outerly of only one manner on the hyperfinite ${\rm II}_1$-factor $\mathcal{R}$. Question: $(\mathcal{R} \subset \mathcal{R} \rtimes \Gamma) ...
2
votes
1answer
190 views

${\rm II}_1$-factors with finite commutant: $\mathcal{A} \cap \mathcal{B} = \mathbb{C} \Rightarrow \mathcal{A}' \cap \mathcal{B}'$ hyperfinite?

Let $\mathcal{A} , \mathcal{B} \subset B(H)$ be ${\rm II}_1$-factors such that $\mathcal{A}', \mathcal{B}' $ are also a ${\rm II}_1$-factors. Question: $\mathcal{A} \cap \mathcal{B} = ...
2
votes
2answers
247 views

${\rm II}_1$-factors with finite commutant and trivial intersection generate $B(H)$?

Let $H$ be an $\infty$-dimensional separable Hilbert space and $B(H)$ the algebra of bounded operators. Let $\mathcal{A}$, $\mathcal{B} \subset B(H)$ be ${\rm II}_1$-factors such that $\mathcal{A}'$, ...
2
votes
0answers
139 views

Are there workable numerical approaches for the pentagon equation?

Warning: this post is the "numerical" analog of Are there workable algebraic geometry approaches for the pentagon equation? I've replaced "algebraic geometry" by "numerical" in its content, ...
6
votes
1answer
632 views

Are there workable algebraic geometry approaches for the pentagon equation?

A pentagon equation is a system of polynomial equations of degree $3$ with several variables and integer coefficients, given by a fusion ring. A fusion ring is given by a finite set of integer ...
2
votes
0answers
627 views

The link between the subfactors and the motives as enriched Galois theories? [closed]

On 29th March 2007, at the "École normale supérieure" of Paris, the mathematician Vaughan Jones, gave a conference (in French) entitled "Les sous-facteurs : une théorie de Galois enrichie" (see here), ...
1
vote
1answer
226 views

Existence of homogeneous single chain compositions of a given maximal subfactor?

All the subfactors here are irreducible inclusion of hyperfinite II$_1$ factors. A subfactor $(N \subset M)$ is Homogeneous Single Chain ($HSC$) if its lattice of intermediate subfactors is a ...
3
votes
0answers
268 views

Are the homogeneous single chain subfactors, Dedekind?

Background: See here and there. Recall that a subfactor is Dedekind if all its intermediate subfactors are normal. A subfactor $(N \subset M)$ is Homogeneous Single Chain (HSC) if its lattice ...
2
votes
0answers
139 views

A section from subfactors to transitive groups

A finite group-subgroup subfactor is a subfactor $(N \subset M)$ isomorphic to $(R^G \subset R^H)$ with $(H \subset G)$ an inclusion of finite groups acting as outer automorphism on the hyperfinite ...
2
votes
1answer
368 views

A second isomorphism theorem for the inclusions of groups

The usual second isomorphism theorem for groups is: let $G$ be a group, $S$ and $N$ subgroups with $N$ normal, then $SN$ is a subgroup of $G$, $S\cap N$ is a normal subgroup of $S$ and $SN/N \simeq ...
4
votes
1answer
241 views

Normal intermediate subgroup and normal core

Let $G$ be a finite group and $H$ a subgroup. The normal core of $H$ in $G$ is $core_G(H) := \bigcap_{g \in G}g^{-1}Hg$ Definition: $K$ is a normal intermediate subgroup of the inclusion $(H ...
1
vote
0answers
185 views

$\mathcal{L}(H_i \subset G_i)$ distributive $\Rightarrow$ $\mathcal{L}(H_1 \times H_2 \subset G_1 \times G_2)$ modular?

Let $\mathcal{L}( G)$ be the lattice of subgroups of $G$ and $\mathcal{L}(H \subset G)$ the lattice of intermediate subgroups. Definitions: A lattice $(L, \wedge, \vee)$ is distributive if, ...
0
votes
2answers
148 views

Products of maximal inclusions of finite groups with a non-obvious intermediate

Let $(H_1 \subset G_1)$ and $(H_2 \subset G_2)$ be core-free maximal inclusions of finite groups. Their product, the inclusion $(H_1 \times H_2 \subset G_1 \times G_2)$, admits four obvious ...
2
votes
0answers
178 views

Existence of inclusions of finite groups with a particular lattice property

Definition : Let $\sim$ be the equivalence relation on inclusions of finite groups, generated by : $(H \subset G) \sim (\phi(H) \subset \phi(G))$, with $ \phi: G \to L$ a finite group morphism and ...