The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

12
votes
0answers
323 views

When are the fibers of a resolution of singularities reduced?

I apologize if this is too much of a fishing expedition, but I've had bad luck searching for any literature on this subject, and I was hoping someone could tell me if it's too easy to be worth ...
9
votes
0answers
265 views

Is a flop on Calabi-Yau threefolds always Atiyah flop?

Is it true that any flop on a Calabi-Yau threefold is given by the Atiyah flop? That is, there always exists a rigid rational curve $\mathbb{P}^1$ with normal bundle ...
4
votes
0answers
197 views

Embedding of a smooth variety into a complete smooth variety.

Consider the following fact from algebraic geometry: Any (complex) smooth algebraic variety can be embedded into a complete smooth variety as a locally closed set. I know how to prove this fact ...
3
votes
0answers
131 views

big and small resolutions of singularities of a 4-fold

Suppose we have a projective 4fold hypersurface $X\subset P^n$ with ordinary singularities along a smooth curve $C$, and suppose that there exist a projective small resolution $s:Y\to X$. let us ...
3
votes
0answers
180 views

References for resolutions of ordinary singular points

Let $X$ be a $n$-dimensional complex projective algebraic variety, let us suppose that $X$ has only isolated singularities. Edit: Let us say that an ordinary $m$-ple singular point is an isolated ...
3
votes
0answers
108 views

equivariant resolution of singularities

I am looking for some references on equivariant resolution of singularities. In most references quoted on mathoverflow (for instance : Reference on an equivariant resolution of singularities), they ...
3
votes
0answers
243 views

“Step-by-Step” toric resolution process?

WLOG the fan $\Sigma$ of our toric variety $X_{\Sigma}$ is simplicial. (So $X_{\Sigma}$ has at worst orbifold singularities and all cones $\sigma \in \Sigma$ are simplicial). The classical toric ...
3
votes
0answers
86 views

(semi-)Small resolutions of Peterson varieties

Peterson varieties (in type A) can be described as the subvarieties of the full flag variety $$\{(F_{i})\;|\; F_{i}\subset \mathbb{C}^{n}, \; \dim F_{i} =i,\; N(F_{i})\subset F_{i+1}\}$$ where $N$ ...
2
votes
0answers
103 views

A question on resolution of singularities

I am wondering if it could be possible in particular cases to resolve a singularity of dimension $n$ by blowing-up a locus of dimension smaller than $n$. For instance consider a cubic surface ...
2
votes
0answers
109 views

Global minimal model over a non-affine base

Remark 10.1.8 in Liu's book (AG and Arithmetic curves) says that over a non-affine base (base is always assumed to be a Dedekind scheme of dim 1), the minimal regular model of a (smooth projective) ...
2
votes
0answers
212 views

Crepant resolutions of cDV singularities?

Compound Du Val 3-fold singularities form a good class of singularities in 3-fold singularity theory. I would like to know which singularities admit crepant resolutions. If I remember correctly, ...
1
vote
0answers
115 views

compatible resolutions of singularities

Let $U$ and $V$ be complex vector spaces with an action of a finite group $G$. Denote by $P_{G,d}$ the space of $G$-equivariant polynomial maps $U\longrightarrow V$ with degree less than or equal to ...
0
votes
0answers
86 views

solve the singularities of parabolic orbits of schubert cells

Let G a semsisimple connect'ed group over $k$, $B$ a Borel and $P$ a parabolic subgroup of $G$ with Weyl group W_{P}. For $w\in W_{P}\backslash W/W_{P}$, how can we solve the singularities of ...
0
votes
0answers
175 views

How to Construct a ''Nice'' Birational Model in Characteristic p>0

Let $X=Spec\ A$ be a normal affine variety of dimension $n$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic $p>0$. Also, assume that $S\subset X$ be a prime Weil-divisor on $X$. Now, I ...
0
votes
0answers
103 views

Is the modification a rational map?

Good morning, I would like to ask the following question concerning the desingularisation, but I'm not familiar at all with these notions. We have the following theorem of Hironaka: Let $X\subset ...