The proofs tag has no wiki summary.

**-2**

votes

**0**answers

72 views

### Prove the contrapositive: (p => q) => (~q => ~p) using only FITCH rules of inference [closed]

I stumbled upon this problem when taking Stanford's Intro to Logic Course. Wikipedia shows some proofs to the contraposition ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition ) but I couldn't fit any of ...

**7**

votes

**2**answers

863 views

### How should you respond to a student who asks whether a very nice physical example constitutes a proof? [closed]

"Is this really a proof?" is the exact question e-mailed to me today from an undergraduate mathematics student whom I know as a highly competent student. The one sentence question was accompanied with ...

**39**

votes

**19**answers

5k views

### Are there proofs that you feel you did not “understand” for a long time?

Perhaps the "proofs" of ABC conjecture or newly released weak version of twin prime conjecture or alike readily come to your mind. These are not the proofs I am looking for. Indeed my question was ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

325 views

### Experimental mathematics: how are floating point equations discovered/converted to exact equations?

the 2005 AMS article/survey on experimental mathematics[1] by Bailey/Borwein mentions many remarkable successes in the field including new formulas for $\pi$ that were discovered via the PSLQ ...

**20**

votes

**15**answers

3k views

### Non-rigorous reasoning in rigorous mathematics

I was wondering what role non-rigorous, heuristic type arguments play in rigorous math. Are there examples of rigorous, formal proofs in which a non-rigorous reasoning still plays a central part?
...

**142**

votes

**64**answers

24k views

### Proofs that require fundamentally new ways of thinking [closed]

I do not know exactly how to characterize the class of proofs that interests me, so let me give some examples and say why I would be interested in more. Perhaps what the examples have in common is ...