For question in Proof Theory, where "proofs" themselves are the object of mathematical investigation. It is not to be used to request a proof of some result.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

4
votes
1answer
61 views

Is there a consistent arithmetically definable extension of PA that proves its own consistency?

I asked this on stackexchange with no answer. The negation would be the obvious generalization of Gödel's second incompleteness from not only r.e. extensions of PA, but to any arithmetically ...
0
votes
0answers
58 views

Prove in GL that no statement can be proven consistent with PA unless PA is inconsistent [closed]

Edit: I moved this question to math.stackexchange.com here as sugested. I'm trying to do a exersie on page 16 of this paper. It says: Exercise. Show, using the rules of Godel-Lob modal logic ...
6
votes
1answer
170 views

Adding a truth-like predicate to PA

It is well known that adding a truth predicate to arithmetic in the most natural way leads to a contradiction. Suppose as usual that we add a one place relation T to the language of arithmetic, and ...
4
votes
0answers
139 views

Set theory and forcing from the point of view of a formal system $G^+$ of Gentzen type

There are four papers by Vladimir Alfeevich Kuznetsov, which discuss the above titled topic: (1) Some problems in set theory from the standpoint of a formal system G+ of Gentzen type. (Russian) Akad. ...
3
votes
0answers
141 views

Reducing Consistency of $PA$ [closed]

By godel translation consistency of $PA$ is equivalent to consistency of $HA$. I want to know any similar theorems for $PA$. 1.What is the minimal theory $T\subsetneq PA$ such that the proof of ...
11
votes
1answer
259 views

Intutionistic Robinson Arithmetic

By Friedman translation $HA$ and $PA$ prove the same $\Pi_2$ formulas. Is it true for Intutionistic Robinson arithmetic(Robinson axioms with intutionistic logic) and classic Robinson arithmetic? ...
1
vote
1answer
133 views

Why is a cut-free system consistent?

Assume that the cut-elimination theorem holds for a system $T$. Then, for any proof that makes use of the cut-rule in $T$, there is a proof that does not make use of the cut-rule. An immediate ...
3
votes
1answer
207 views

How do I evaluate this sum for $s$ is a complex variable :$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n^{2s}n!}$?

This question related to this question in SE ,I would like to know how do I evaluate this sum for $s$ is a complex variable :$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n^{2s}n!}$$ . Edit01:And I think ...
11
votes
3answers
374 views

Algorithmic complexity of formal proof verification?

In this question, suppose $S$ is some popular real-world automated proof system that is stronger than or equivalent to Peano Arithmetic. I would be happy with a positive answer to the following for ...
6
votes
3answers
1k views

Euler's constant: irrationality and proof theory

Let γ represent Euler's constant. Is there a real number x such that there is a proof within Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF) that x is irrational and there is also a proof within ZF that γ + x is ...
2
votes
0answers
63 views

A Question on Provability Logic and Co-Necessitation

The provability logic $GL$ has the characteristic axioms: $K\hspace{15pt}\Box(\alpha\rightarrow \beta)\rightarrow(\Box\alpha\rightarrow\Box\beta)$ $L\hspace{15pt}\Box(\Box \alpha\rightarrow ...
4
votes
2answers
149 views

Does the notion of provably total function depend on the chosen representation?

A typical definition of "provably total function in a theory $T$" goes like this (paraphrased from Odifreddi, Classical Recursion Theory II): A function $f : \mathbb{N}^n \to \mathbb{N}$ is ...
8
votes
0answers
210 views

(A little bit) Beyond the E-recursive

The E-recursive functions are a particular generalization of classical recursion theory to the entire set-theoretic universe, $V$. They are defined via a schemes: see ...
35
votes
4answers
2k views

Hilbert's (cancelled) 24th problem

Hilbert's 23 problems, ten of which were presented at the 1900 ICM in Paris, are too famous for any mathematician to not know. If one reads the descriptions of the problems in Hilbert's paper, one ...
11
votes
0answers
300 views

Large cardinals arising from alternate set theories

My question is whether there are model-theoretic large cardinal axioms associated with $NFU$ - or more generally, with set theories other than $ZFC$. Large cardinal properties generally come in one ...
6
votes
1answer
167 views

Proof-theoretic ordinals after liberalizing induction to $RCA_0$

This is kind of a follow-up to this question. For a class $\Gamma$ of second-order formulas (here either $\Sigma_n^0$ or $\Sigma_n^1$), let $X\Gamma$ be a formal theory consisting of $RCA_0$ together ...
9
votes
0answers
153 views

From interpolation to separation

Lusin's separation theorem states that, if $A$ and $B$ are disjoint analytic subsets of a Polish space, then there is a Borel set $X$ separating them ($A\subseteq X$, $B\cap X=\emptyset$). Craig's ...
4
votes
0answers
98 views

What useful admissible rules does ZFC have beyond the deduction theorem?

I'm interested in formal proof verification, and one of the surprisingly difficult parts of this is dealing with proofs by contradiction. The issue is that the final step of such proofs is typically ...
4
votes
0answers
109 views

Undecidability of the existential theory

Do you know if I can find the proof that the existential theory of $\mathbb{Z}$ with the structure of addition , divisibility and the relation $(\exists s \in \mathbb{Z})m=np^s$ is undecidable, ...
0
votes
2answers
145 views

Undecidable set of problems [closed]

Is there some set of problems, for which determining if given problem is decidable or not is itself undecidable?
6
votes
1answer
262 views

Which ordinals are proof-theoretic ordinals?

Few months ago I have posted this question on MO, but I must admit that at the time, admittedly, I had no idea on how technical proof-theoretic considerations can be. I have decided to revise this ...
-2
votes
1answer
88 views

Reconciling undecidability of FOL with Soundness and Completeness of Hilbert Proof Systems [closed]

I am reading Logic and Declarative Languages by Michael Downward, where he describes Hilbert's Proof System for First Order Logic and states that it is both sound and complete, he then adds that: ...
0
votes
1answer
227 views

Provability of unprovability

I have three questions (without any real background, this is just something I've been wondering about recently) Can PA prove that PA can't prove nor disprove, say, Goodstein theorem (or any natural ...
7
votes
0answers
366 views

Godel's second incompleteness theorem for non-r.e. theories

R. Jeroslow in this paper proves that a non-recursively enumerable theory whose set of theorems is $\Delta_2$-definable may prove consistency of itself but it can not prove 2-consistency of itself. ...
6
votes
2answers
998 views

What defines a “short proof”?

I would like to know what the definition of a short proof is. In Lance Fortnow’s article “The Status of the P Versus NP Problem”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 52 No. 9, he says, If a formula θ ...
4
votes
1answer
213 views

Generalizing a result of Kreisel on $\omega$-consistency

In (reference)The following result is attributed to Kreisel: Lemma1(Kreisel) If $T$ is an $\omega$-consistent theory in the language of arithmetic and $\pi$ is a true $\Pi_1$ sentence, then $T+\pi$ ...
8
votes
0answers
366 views

What is known about the reverse mathematics of algebraic number fields?

I know work on the reverse mathematics of countable algebraic field extensions including Galois theory, notably including Dorais, Hirst, and Shafer http://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.4944v2.pdf. But algebraic ...
13
votes
1answer
540 views

Can ZFC prove it cannot derive an inconsistency in $n$ steps?

Let $Con(\mathtt{ZFC}, n)$ denote the statement "$\mathtt{ZFC}$ cannot prove the contradiction within $n$ steps (or better within $n$ symbols) within a given proof system (say a natural deduction to ...
2
votes
1answer
84 views

Notion of strongness in cut rule [closed]

I've read somewhere that the cut rule in sequent calculus $$\frac{A \vdash \mathbf{C}, B \qquad A',\mathbf{C} \vdash B'}{A,A' \vdash B,B'} (\text{cut})$$ states that the $\mathbf{C}$ on the right is ...
1
vote
2answers
320 views

What is the consistency strength of a standard model of ZF versus a transitive model?

A standard model of ZF need not be transitive, of course, and Joel David Hamkins' answer to Large cardinal axioms and Grothendieck universes gives Tarski sets as an interesting example. I should ...
6
votes
1answer
227 views

Higher order arithmetic and fragments of ZFC

Zbierski "Models for Higher Order Arithmetics" (BULL. DE L'ACAD. POLONAISE DES SCIENCES Serie des sciences math., astr. et phys. - Vol. XIX, No. 7, 1971) defines ZF$_n$ as ZFC with the power set axiom ...
12
votes
1answer
810 views

Von Neumann's consistency proof

In the paper Zur Hilbertschen Beweistheorie, John Von Neumann has proposed a consistency proof for a fragment of first-order arithmetic (the fragment without induction and with the successor axioms ...
9
votes
2answers
294 views

When was Bounded Zermelo set theory first formulated?

Bounded Zermelo set theory, and many variants named for MacLane in some way, are used in equiconsistency proofs for Simple Theory of Types plus infinity, and for the Elementary Theory of the Category ...
9
votes
2answers
381 views

Peano arithmetic vs. fast-growing hierarchy with pathological fundamental sequences

Fundamental sequence for a countable limit ordinal $\alpha$ is an increasing sequence $\{\alpha[i]\}$ of ordinals of length $\omega$ such that $\lim_{i\rightarrow\omega}\alpha[i]=\alpha$. There are ...
8
votes
1answer
268 views

Which ordinals can be proof-theoretic ordinals of a reasonable theory?

When talking to a friend recently he asked a question - are there any reasonable first-order theories which have proof theoretic ordinal equal to small or large Veblen ordinal? I have then extended ...
1
vote
2answers
309 views

An interpretation of not-Con(PA)

Edit After Andreas Blass answer below and comments below the original post I have changed it to accommodate posters' remarks. I hope it is clear and makes more sense now. Let $\mathrm{PA}$ be the ...
12
votes
1answer
744 views

Time in Girard's Geometry of Interaction

Jean-Yves Girard writes at the end of his paper "Towards a Geometry of Interaction", page 105, that we have three intuitions about the nature of time: time is logic modulo the order of rules, time ...
6
votes
2answers
219 views

Models of PRA/EFA with induction on $X$ but not $\omega^X$

As I currently understand it, induction on formulas containing $N+1$ first-order quantifiers is required to prove the well-ordering of the ordinal $(\omega \uparrow\uparrow N) < \epsilon_0$, that ...
6
votes
1answer
320 views

Essential incompleteness via diophantine formulas?

Work in the first order language of number theory, consisting of the symbols $\mathbf{0}$, $\mathbf{S}$, $\boldsymbol{+}$, and $\boldsymbol{\cdot}$, and let $Q$ denote Robinson's arithmetic. By a ...
4
votes
1answer
113 views

Results where complexity bounds implies finite number of test cases

We have all been there, when a formula works for the first 30 parameters, but it is not sufficient for a proof. My question is where one can actually just check a finite number of cases, to conclude ...
7
votes
2answers
384 views

Proof complexity of two directions of equivalency?

This question is not precise, but I believe has a precise formulation. Consider a mathematical theorem which gives an equivalency between two conditions. As an extreme example: \begin{theorem} A ...
11
votes
4answers
1k views

Does formalizing math require search and creativity, or is it near-mechanical?

I remember reading somewhere that it takes about a week to convert a page of math into something a proof-assistant like Isabelle or HOL Light would accept. Is this type of conversion something that ...
12
votes
1answer
436 views

Is it possible for a theorem to be constructive only in a non-constructive metatheory?

There are several theorems in category-theoretic logic which say something like, "any proposition in X logic that is provable in topos logic assuming (the law of excluded middle and) the axiom of ...
4
votes
1answer
180 views

Gödel's speed up theorem and Matiyasevich polynomials

Unless I am sadly mistaken, there should exist a polynomial $ P\in\mathbb Z[X_1,X_2,\dots, X_n]$ coding for the speed-up theorem (for, say, ZFC), i.e. having the following properties : 1) P has an ...
1
vote
1answer
193 views

notable inductive proofs relating to fractals

what are notable/ prominent inductive proofs relating to fractals? the motivation for this question is: fractals are very difficult mathematical objects to work with, and many ...
4
votes
0answers
87 views

$n$th order arithmetic with predicates for orders

Two papers I have looked at lately axiomatize $n$-th order arithmetic in a single sorted language with predicates $Z_1,\dots,Z_n$ and axioms like $\forall x(Z_1(x)\vee\dots\vee Z_n(x))$ to say ...
7
votes
1answer
325 views

Does the totality of Ackermann's function prove the consistency of $\Sigma_1$-induction?

It is well known that Ackermann's function is not primitive recursive. Therefore, the theories of primitive recursive arithmetic (PRA) and of $\Sigma_1$-induction ($I\Sigma_1$) cannot prove the ...
24
votes
2answers
535 views

Why is there no connection between fast-growing functions and complex analysis

I found myself wondering the other day whether the fast-growing functions from natural to naturals that are studied by people like proof theorists are the restriction to the naturals of analytic ...
2
votes
1answer
254 views

what are the proof-theoretic ordinals of second-order arithmetic and ZFC? [duplicate]

are they still smaller than omega-1-CK?what are the notations of them?
12
votes
1answer
236 views

Nontrivial upper bounds on proof-theoretic ordinals of strong theories: do we have any?

Motivated by Consistency of Analysis (second order arithmetic) and Proof-Theoretic Ordinal of ZFC or Consistent ZFC Extensions?, I have the following question: Are there any examples of strong ...