0
votes
0answers
18 views

sufficiency of the relative discriminant to be a square of an ideal for an unramified quadratic extension

Is it sufficient for a quadratic extension of a cubic number field to have a relative discriminant as a square of an ideal for being unramified extension (excluding primes dividing 2 for the sake of ...
4
votes
2answers
307 views

On class numbers $h(-d)$ and the diophantine equation $x^2+dy^2 = 2^{2+h(-d)}$

Given fundamental discriminant $d \equiv -1 \bmod 8$ such that the quadratic imaginary number field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d})$ has odd class number $h(-d)$. Is it true that one can always solve the ...
18
votes
1answer
1k views

Are class numbers encoded in the absolute Galois group of ${\mathbb Q}$?

The absolute Galois group $G_{\mathbb Q}=\text{Gal}(\bar{\mathbb Q}/\mathbb Q)$, as a profinite group, encodes a lot of things: the whole lattice of number fields (closed subgroups of finite index), ...
6
votes
1answer
573 views

Is there an analog of class field theory over an arbitrary infinite field of algebraic numbers?

Recently, I found a paper by Schilling http://www.jstor.org/pss/2371426, which mentions that for certain infinite field of algebraic numbers there is an analog of class field theory. By infinite field ...
13
votes
5answers
1k views

Given a number field $K$, when is its Hilbert class field an abelian extension of $\mathbb{Q}$?

Given a number field $K$, when is its Hilbert class field an abelian extension of $\mathbb{Q}$? I am going to be on the road soon, so pleas don't be offended if I don't respond quickly to a comment.
1
vote
1answer
754 views

Neukirch's class field axiom and cohomology of units for unramified extension

This question may be too detailed but perhaps somebody knows the answer: Neukirch proofs in his algebraic number theory book in chapter IV, proposition 6.2, that his class field axiom implies that the ...