Tagged Questions

0
votes
0answers
59 views

Reference for Cech cohomology for Nisnevich topology

I need the theorems that prove that Nisnevich cohomology can be computed by the Cech complex similar to what happens in the étale topology. I know this has to be true since (More …
8
votes
1answer
287 views

Motivic cohomology and cohomology of Milnor K-theory sheaf

Let $X$ be a smooth variety over a field $k$. (Assume $k$ has characteristic 0 if it helps; in fact I'd be happy to assume that $k$ is a finite extension of either $\mathbf{Q}$ or …
4
votes
1answer
338 views

Voevodsky’s proof in any characteristic (for motivic and Chow)

Regarding the published version of "Motivic cohomology groups are isomorphic to higher Chow groups in any characterstic" (IMRN) available at: http://imrn.oxfordjournals.org/conten …
3
votes
0answers
97 views

Correspondences of schemes induced by a finite Galois extension

I am trying to do the first exercises of the Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel book Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology, which are some elementary results about correspondences between scheme …
1
vote
1answer
123 views

Definition of Hurewicz map relating $SH(k)$ with $DM_\_^{eff}(k)$

In "Motivic Homotopy Theory" on page 153 it is stated that there exists a canonical Hurewicz map relating the motivic stable homotopy category with the category $\operatorname{DM}_ …
10
votes
1answer
317 views

Can there exist Chow motives/motivic cohomology for compact Kähler manifolds?

Can there exist a 'reasonable' extension of the (higher) Chow groups of complex smooth projective algebraic varieties to functors on the category of compact Kähler manifolds? Are t …
0
votes
0answers
151 views

Vanishing of motivic cohomology with finite coefficients in negative degrees

I wonder whether the "finite coefficient version" of Beilinson-Soule conjecture i.e. the following statement holds or not. STATEMENT: Let $X$ be a smooth and projective scheme ov …
2
votes
0answers
247 views

Voevodsky’s ‘split standard triple’ argument: an explanation; does it work with $Z/nZ$-coefficients?

For varieties over a perfect field (of some characteristic $p$ that could be 0) Voevodsky defines the notion of a 'standard triple' (see http://books.google.ru/books?id=TzUmk87bN9c …
25
votes
1answer
817 views

What is the relationship between motivic cohomology and the theory of motives?

I will begin by giving a rough sketch of my understanding of motives. In many expositions about motives (for example, www.jmilne.org/math/xnotes/MOT102.pdf), the category of motiv …
1
vote
1answer
165 views

Is There a Mayer-Vietoris Spectral Sequence of Motivic Cohomology for Closed Coverings?

For etale cohomology, there is a spectral sequence of the following form ("Mayer-Vietories spectral sequence for closed covers"): $E_{1}^{p,q}=\oplus_{i_{0}< \cdots < i_{p}} …
5
votes
2answers
255 views

When do the $\gamma$-filtration and codimension filtration of K-theory agree?

Let $X$ be a smooth quasiprojective algebraic variety over a field $k$. Then the $K$-groups $K_m(X)$ are defined, and there are two standard filtrations on them: the "codimension f …
3
votes
2answers
679 views

Milnor-Bloch-Kato conjecture implies the Beilinson-Lichtenbaum conjecture

Voevodsky reformulated the Milnor-Bloch-Kato conjecture as a change-of-topology morphism from the Zariski to the étale topology of a field with torsion coefficients being an isomor …
10
votes
1answer
497 views

Motivic cohomology vs. K-theory for singular varieties

As far as I understand, for a smooth variety $X$ its motivic cohomology could be described as the corresponding piece of the $\gamma$-filtration of (Quillen's) $K^*(X)$; this is co …
8
votes
2answers
842 views

State of the art for Gersten’s conjecture for K-theory?

Does anyone know (of a reference to) under what restrictions on the regular scheme $X$ it is known that we have an exact sequence $$0 \to \mathcal{K}_n(X) \to \bigoplus_{x \in X^{ …
3
votes
0answers
399 views

Weak Lefschetz for torsion motivic cohomology (or torsion Chow groups)?

I am trying to prove the following Weak-Lefschetz-type statement for motivic cohomology: if $Z$ is a smooth hyperplane section of a smooth projective $X$ of dimension $d$ (say, ove …

1 2 3 next
15 30 50 per page