1
vote
1answer
394 views

Standard conjectures on positive characteristic

In this MO answer of M. Bondarko, he says: "the Hodge conjecture implies all the Grothendieck's standard conjectures over base fields of characteristic 0..." and in Remarks on Grothendieck's ...
4
votes
0answers
85 views

The 'most general' papers on rational Borel-Moore motivic homology and K'-theory?

There are two ways to define Borel-Moore motivic homology (of schemes) with rational coefficients: one should either consider certain complexes of algebraic cycles, or the $\gamma$-filtrations of ...
1
vote
0answers
88 views

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
9
votes
0answers
491 views

Has there been any progress on the standard conjectures on algebraic cycles?

What's the current state of these conjectures? Who is working on them? In "Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles" Grothendieck says: "They would form the basis of the so-called "theory of ...
8
votes
1answer
253 views

Known norm varieties and the Bloch-Kato conjecture

The Bloch-Kato conjecture states that $K_M^n(k)/l \simeq H^n(k,\mu^{\otimes n}_l)$ for every $n,l$,while $l$ is invertible in $k$. A important part in the proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture is to ...
11
votes
3answers
542 views

Applications of homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky

One of the most important theorems in motivic homotopy theory is the homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky which says that the motivic Thom space of the normal bundle $\mathcal N_{Z/X}$ of a ...
3
votes
0answers
301 views

Two questions on motivic homotopy theory

I am a beginner in motivic homotopy theory and motivic cohomology and have just begun reading books by Dundas et al. and Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel. I have two basic questions: Why is the question of ...
3
votes
0answers
151 views

Correspondences of schemes induced by a finite Galois extension

I am trying to do the first exercises of the Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel book Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology, which are some elementary results about correspondences between schemes. Recall that if ...
1
vote
1answer
174 views

Definition of Hurewicz map relating $SH(k)$ with $DM_\_^{eff}(k)$

In "Motivic Homotopy Theory" on page 153 it is stated that there exists a canonical Hurewicz map relating the motivic stable homotopy category with the category $\operatorname{DM}_\_^{eff}(k)$. ...
2
votes
0answers
272 views

Voevodsky's 'split standard triple' argument: an explanation; does it work with $Z/nZ$-coefficients?

For varieties over a perfect field (of some characteristic $p$ that could be 0) Voevodsky defines the notion of a 'standard triple' (see ...
11
votes
1answer
396 views

Can there exist Chow motives/motivic cohomology for compact Kähler manifolds?

Can there exist a 'reasonable' extension of the (higher) Chow groups of complex smooth projective algebraic varieties to functors on the category of compact Kähler manifolds? Are there any ...
39
votes
1answer
2k views

What is the relationship between motivic cohomology and the theory of motives?

I will begin by giving a rough sketch of my understanding of motives. In many expositions about motives (for example, www.jmilne.org/math/xnotes/MOT102.pdf), the category of motives is defined to be ...
11
votes
1answer
622 views

Motivic cohomology vs. K-theory for singular varieties

As far as I understand, for a smooth variety $X$ its motivic cohomology could be described as the corresponding piece of the $\gamma$-filtration of (Quillen's) $K^*(X)$; this is completely true for ...
3
votes
0answers
446 views

Weak Lefschetz for torsion motivic cohomology (or torsion Chow groups)?

I am trying to prove the following Weak-Lefschetz-type statement for motivic cohomology: if $Z$ is a smooth hyperplane section of a smooth projective $X$ of dimension $d$ (say, over the field of ...
1
vote
1answer
395 views

Are finite correspondances flat?

In Voevodsky&Mazza&Weibel's book on motivic cohomology they define "an elementary correspondance from X (Smooth connected scheme over $k$) to Y (separated scheme over $k$) as an irreducible ...
10
votes
1answer
464 views

Stable motivic cohomology with finite coefficients?

In this question, which attracted no responces so far, I've asked whether it is possible to extend the Beilinson-Lichtenbaum etale descent rule for motivic cohomology to singular varieties, in ...
10
votes
0answers
874 views

Are there analogues of Beilinson's conjectures for motives with coefficients?

There's a body of wisdom (following Beilinson, Bloch, Deligne, ...) relating mixed Tate motives, motivic cohomology, algebraic K-theory, special values of L-functions, and polylogarithms. My ...
9
votes
6answers
1k views

Kunneth formula for motivic cohomology

I was wondering when the Kunneth formula holds for motivic cohomology: $$ H^p(X,A(\alpha)) = \bigoplus_{i+j=p;\beta+\gamma = \alpha} H^j(X,A(\beta)) \otimes H^i(X,A(\gamma)) $$ where ...