The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

7
votes
1answer
245 views

Why do we need localization by Leftschetz motive?

Definition of the Grothendieck group and Leftschetz motive. The Grothendieck group of varieties is a free abelian group generated by classes of algebraic varieties with the following relation: $$ ...
15
votes
0answers
311 views

Why is the CM closure of $\mathbb{Q}$ the “ultimate” coefficient field for motives?

In a rough way, a category of motives over a field $k$ with coefficients in a field $K$ gives a universal cohomology theory with coefficients in $K$ for algebraic varieties defined over $k$. I had the ...
1
vote
1answer
200 views

Splitting varieties of two Galois cohomology symbols

One characteristic property of the so called norm varieties defined by Rost, is that they split pure symbols of Galois cohomology groups $H^n(k,\mu_p)$, meaning: For some $\alpha \in H^n(k,\mu_p)$ ...
3
votes
1answer
241 views

“Weight-mondoromy” for open varieties

Suppose that $X/\mathbb{Q}_p$ is a smooth, projective variety, and choose a prime $\ell\neq p$. Then the weight-monodromy conjecture says that the graded pieces $\mathrm{Gr}_k^M$ of the monodromy ...
2
votes
1answer
288 views

Algebraic equivalence vs linear equivalence

Maybe the question is too general, but nevertheless: under what conditions on algebraic variety $X$, algebraic equivalence of divisors coincide with linear equivalence? What are typical classes of ...
3
votes
1answer
185 views

Etale Realization and Gysin Sequence

Ivorra defined a tensor triangulated functor from Voevodsky's triangulated category of motives to the derived category of complexes of etale sheaves of $\mathbb{Z}/n$ modules with bounded cohomology ...
10
votes
2answers
417 views

Are there known cases of the Mumford–Tate conjecture that do not use Abelian varieties?

(For a formulation of the Mumford–Tate conjecture, see below.) The question As far as I know, all non-trivial known cases of the Mumford–Tate conjecture more or less depend on the Mumford–Tate ...
3
votes
0answers
90 views

Galois group for 0-dimensional motives

$\newcommand{\M}{\mathcal{M}_0}$$\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}}$ It is my understanding that in dimension 0, the theory of motives should just be Galois theory for fields. I am hoping to find a reference ...
4
votes
0answers
287 views

Use of derivators to the theory of motives?

This is a rather imprecise question but i think this could become a interesting pool of ideas and comments. The theory of motives has evolved to a complex field of research the moment Voevodsky (and ...
12
votes
2answers
2k views

Mysterious quotes (at least for me)

I heard two quotes, one from Alain Connes and an other one from Orlov. Alain Connes was talking about noncommutative geometry and he said the following: " a noncommutative algebra creates its own ...
10
votes
3answers
758 views

why are motives more serious than “naive” motives?

I know my question is a bit vague, sorry for this. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero. Consider the Grothendieck ring of varieties over $k$, usually denoted by $K_0(Var_k)$. This is generated ...
5
votes
0answers
203 views

Any counterexamples known for the Generalized Tate conjecture?

One can state the generalized Tate conjecture over arbitrary finitely generated fields; to this end one should just define Galois representation to be effective if the eignevalues of the actions of ...
1
vote
0answers
81 views

relations between nori motives and pure motives

The category of Nori motives $NMM$ is defined by tools of graph category. I think one can similarly define a category $EM$ as the graph category of $P(k)$ (the graph of projective smooth k-varieties) ...
2
votes
1answer
153 views

About embedding pure motives into the triangulated category of mixed motives and some further questions about motivic cohomology

I have tried reading some texts about motives, mainly motivic cohomology (Bloch's " Lectures on Algebraic Cycles", Voevodsky's "Motivic Cohomology" etc). However some things confused me. I don't know ...
0
votes
0answers
103 views

What can one say about zero-cycle groups for products of Chow motives

What can one say about the Chow group of zero-cycles (up to rational equivalence) for a product of smooth projective varieties and Chow motives (so, I am interested in the kernel $Chow_0(P)\otimes ...
1
vote
0answers
135 views

Which “concrete” morphisms of varieties and motives induce bijections of their lower Chow groups?

This question is a continuation of Varieties with Chow groups supported in positive codimension: examples and properties? What examples are known of morphisms of varieties and Chow motives (say, over ...
0
votes
0answers
45 views

Binary motives in the decomposition of a minimal Pfister neighbor

Let $\alpha \in H^n(k,\mu_2)$ and $X_\alpha$ be the respective Pfister quadric. Its well known due to Rost that the Motive $M(X_\alpha)$ decomposes as a sum of twisted Rost motives $R_\alpha$ such ...
5
votes
2answers
223 views

Are Anderson $T$-motives motives for the function field analogy?

this question is related to this one Geometry for Anderson's motives?, though the previous one doesn't answer exactly my question. Let $\mathbb{C}_{\infty}$ be the function field analog of ...
1
vote
1answer
445 views

Standard conjectures on positive characteristic

In this MO answer of M. Bondarko, he says: "the Hodge conjecture implies all the Grothendieck's standard conjectures over base fields of characteristic 0..." and in Remarks on Grothendieck's ...
14
votes
1answer
1k views

Is there a higher Grothendieck ring?

Fix a field $k$. The Grothendieck ring $K_0(\mathrm{Var}_k)$ of varieties over $k$ is defined as the quotient of the free abelian group on isomorphism classes of algebraic varieties by the scissor ...
1
vote
1answer
100 views

Dimension of binary motives of a quadric

Let $Q$ be a anisotropic quadric of dimension $d$ over $k$. We work in the category of effective Chow-Motives over $k$. Let $T$ be the Tate-Motive. For a motive $M$ we write $M(l)$ for its $l$-th ...
4
votes
0answers
103 views

The 'most general' papers on rational Borel-Moore motivic homology and K'-theory?

There are two ways to define Borel-Moore motivic homology (of schemes) with rational coefficients: one should either consider certain complexes of algebraic cycles, or the $\gamma$-filtrations of ...
1
vote
0answers
90 views

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
4
votes
2answers
628 views

Connections between Standard, Hodge and Tate conjectures on algebraic cycles?

What implications would a solution of the Standard Conjectures have on the Hodge and Tate Conjectures and reverse?
5
votes
1answer
263 views

Motivic L-function vs motivic zeta function

Let $M$ be a pure motive over a field $k$. Roughly speaking, the L-function of $M$ is the product over all primes $p$ of $$L_p(M,s)=\det(I-Fr_p|_{M_\ell^I} N(p)^{-s})^{-1}$$ where $Fr_p$ is a ...
6
votes
1answer
217 views

Is the Tate conjecture known for etale covers of products of curves

Let $X$ be a (smooth projective geometrically connected) surface over a finitely generated field $k$. The Tate conjecture predicts that, for $l$ a prime number invertible in $k$, the Chern class map ...
2
votes
0answers
152 views

What is the relation between Beilinson's conjectures and Standard conjectures of algebraic cycles?

Do Standard conjectures on the K-theory of varieties over finite field have implications in the motivic cohomology of Z where exist the correct formalism of Beilinson's conjectures? What is the ...
10
votes
0answers
669 views

Has there been any progress on the standard conjectures on algebraic cycles?

What's the current state of these conjectures? Who is working on them? In "Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles" Grothendieck says: "They would form the basis of the so-called "theory of ...
0
votes
1answer
218 views

Articles about Weil cohomology theory by Grothendieck and Artin

In "The Standard Conjectures" Kleiman says that the following properties of Weil cohomology theory were proved in 1963 for étale cohomology by Artin and Grothendieck, except for the last one that it ...
8
votes
1answer
279 views

Known norm varieties and the Bloch-Kato conjecture

The Bloch-Kato conjecture states that $K_M^n(k)/l \simeq H^n(k,\mu^{\otimes n}_l)$ for every $n,l$,while $l$ is invertible in $k$. A important part in the proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture is to ...
16
votes
0answers
324 views

$\zeta(n)$ as a mixed Tate motive

I am trying to understand why there exists, for each $n \geq 2$, a mixed Tate motive $M$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ such that $M \in Ext^1_{MT(\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q}(0), \mathbb{Q}(n))$ and $\zeta(n)$, ...
4
votes
1answer
245 views

why Borel's computation implies Beilinson-Soulé?

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and $DM(k)_{\mathrm{Q}}$ Voevodsky's category of motives over $k$ with rational coefficients. The Beilinson-Soulé conjecture says $$ ...
6
votes
1answer
314 views

Equivariant motivic sheaves

Thanks to the work of Cisinski-Deglise: http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.2110, we now have a triangulated category of `motivic sheaves' available that admits the standard yoga of the six functors. Is there ...
9
votes
1answer
303 views

Is there a yoga of effectivity for motives and their realizations?

Inside the 'usual' categories of motives (Chow, Voevodsky ones) there are the categories of effective motives. Similarly, there are effective Hodge structures; they seem to be closely related with ...
0
votes
1answer
86 views

Rost Correspondence and minimal Pfister-Neighbors

In http://www.math.uiuc.edu/K-theory/0357/ Karpenko utters the following, $Conjecture$ $1.6.$ If an anisotropic quadric $X = Q$ possesses a Rost correspondence, then the quadratic form (defining $X$) ...
4
votes
1answer
248 views

motives of elliptic curves, modular forms, Hecke characters

Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $\mathbb{Q}$. By the modularity theorem, $L(E, s)$ is the $L$-function of some modular form $f$. Now one has the following motives: (a) The Chow motive $h^1(E)$ ...
12
votes
2answers
422 views

What is the coefficient ring of algebraic K theory of the discrete $\mathbb{C}$?

Ordinary (connective) complex $K$-theory is the algebraic $K$ theory of the topological ring $\mathbb{C}$ with analytic topology. One can also study the $K$ theory of $\mathbb{C}$ with discrete ...
2
votes
0answers
599 views

The link between the subfactors and the motives as enriched Galois theories? [closed]

On 29th March 2007, at the "École normale supérieure" of Paris, the mathematician Vaughan Jones, gave a conference (in French) entitled "Les sous-facteurs : une théorie de Galois enrichie" (see here), ...
2
votes
0answers
192 views

tensor of motives

Let $X$ and $Y$ be two smooth projective varieties over $k$. Consider the Chow motives $M(X\times\mathbb{P}^n)\simeq M(X)\otimes M(\mathbb{P}^n)$ and $M(Y\times\mathbb{P}^n)\simeq M(Y)\otimes ...
15
votes
2answers
574 views

$p$-adic periods

For a variety $X$ defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, there's a (functorial) comparison isomorphism $$ H^i_{dR}(X)\otimes\mathbb{C}\to H^i_B(X,\mathbb{Q})\otimes\mathbb{C}. $$ If we pick $\mathbb{Q}$-bases for ...
8
votes
1answer
207 views

Cohomology of relative motives

Notation Let $S$ be a scheme, proper over a field $k$. Let $\mathrm{SmPr}_{S}$ denote the category of smooth projective $S$-schemes. Let $\mathcal{M}_{S}$ denote the category of relative Chow motives ...
11
votes
0answers
654 views

Motivic derived algebraic geometry

In algebraic geometry one studies spaces locally modelled on commutative algebras, i.e. commutative algebra objects in the symmetric monoidal category Ab of abelian groups. Now supposedly in the ...
12
votes
3answers
574 views

Applications of homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky

One of the most important theorems in motivic homotopy theory is the homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky which says that the motivic Thom space of the normal bundle $\mathcal N_{Z/X}$ of a ...
3
votes
0answers
341 views

Two questions on motivic homotopy theory

I am a beginner in motivic homotopy theory and motivic cohomology and have just begun reading books by Dundas et al. and Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel. I have two basic questions: Why is the question of ...
11
votes
1answer
537 views

Reasons for the use of Nisnevich topology in motivic homotopy theory

The objects of interest in motivic homotopy theory are "spaces"-which are simplicial sheaves of sets on the big Nisnevich site $Sm/k$ of smooth schemes of finite type over a field $k$. I understand ...
0
votes
0answers
104 views

Rost-Motive for n > 2

Have a look on this Paper http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1998-35-02/S0273-0979-98-00745-9/S0273-0979-98-00745-9.pdf and go to example 6.5 please. In this article Morel writes that the Rost-Motive ...
1
vote
0answers
114 views

The right (not the left 'Suslin complex' one) adjoint to the embedding of $ DM^{eff} $ into $D(ShvTr) $?

Inside the derived category of Nisnevich sheaves with transfers there is the category $DM^{eff} $ of Voevodsky's effective motivic complexes (actually, Voevodsky only considered bounded above ...
10
votes
0answers
324 views

The status of automorphic induction

Background: Let $K/F$ be a degree $r$ extension of number fields. It is conjectured that an automorphic representation of GL$_n$ associated to $K$ induces an automorphic representation of GL$_{rn}$ ...
4
votes
0answers
155 views

Finer motivic decomposition in a bigger motivic category

In his Ph.D. thesis, Semenov shows that the motivic decomposition of a variety in general is not unique. He works in the category of Chow-Motives and not in a bigger category of motives. Is there an ...
16
votes
1answer
868 views

For which varieties is the natural map from the Chow ring to integral cohomology an isomorphism?

My apologies if this question is too naive. Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex variety. There is a natural map $A^{\bullet}(X) \to H^{2\bullet}(X)$ of graded rings from the Chow ring of $X$ to ...