**12**

votes

**3**answers

1k views

### Are there natural examples of mathematical statements which follow from consistency statements?

Motivation
One of the methods for strictly extending a theory $T$ (which is axiomatizable and consistent, and includes enough arithmetic) is adding the sentence expressing the consistency of $T$ ( ...

**66**

votes

**18**answers

9k views

### Can a mathematical definition be wrong?

This question originates from a bit of history. In the first paper on quantum Turing machines, the authors left a key uniformity condition out of their definition. Three mathematicians subsequently ...

**13**

votes

**3**answers

1k views

### Has there ever been a weaker Church-like thesis?

Background. The Church-Turing thesis, in one of its many equivalent formulations, states that the intuitively computable arithmetical functions are exactly those computed by Turing machines.
...

**40**

votes

**15**answers

6k views

### Abstract Thought vs Calculation

Jeremy Avigad and Erich Reck in their remarkable historical paper "Clarifying the nature of the infinite: the development of metamathematics and proof theory" claim that one of the factors of becoming ...

**10**

votes

**6**answers

1k views

### Defining variable, symbol, indeterminate and parameter

Are there precise definitions for what a variable, a symbol, a name, an indeterminate, a meta-variable, and a parameter are?
In informal mathematics, they are used in a variety of ways, and often in ...

**21**

votes

**9**answers

5k views

### Why are proofs so valuable, although we do not know that our axiom system is consistent? [closed]

As a person who has been spending significant time to learn mathematics, I have to admit that I sometimes find the fact uncovered by Godel very upsetting: we never can know that our axiom system is ...

**1**

vote

**2**answers

754 views

### Mathematics of the Anthropic Principle [closed]

A form of the anthropic principle is as follows: "We can observe the universe only because we can exist within it in some way such that we can observe it, and it exists such that we can observe it."
...

**59**

votes

**38**answers

12k views

### nontrivial theorems with trivial proofs

A while back I saw posted on someone's office door a statement attributed to some famous person, saying that it is an instance of the callousness of youth to think that a theorem is trivial because ...

**15**

votes

**2**answers

2k views

### Clarification of Gödel's second incompleteness theorem

I am sorry for the following question, because the actual answer to this question is in the beautiful works of Feferman and Jeroslow, but, unfortunately, I havn't any time to go into that specific ...

**4**

votes

**0**answers

658 views

### BGG category everywhere implies generalized Kazhdan-Lusztig formula?

Maybe this question is vague. I am not an expert on what I asked, if I made mistake, please point out.
BGG category was discoverd in Lie algebra setting. One has Verma module $M(\lambda)$, ...

**18**

votes

**8**answers

4k views

### To what extent is it true that “number theory = mathematics”? [closed]

In a thought-provoking answer to this MO question, Kevin Buzzard
and several commentators have described a multitude of ways in which
number theory is related to other parts of mathematics. It seems ...

**6**

votes

**2**answers

1k views

### Using the multiverse approach to decide the law of the exluded middle?

Recently, in response to deciding the Continuum Hypothesis $CH$, Hamkins and Gitman have proposed consider a multiverse of set-theoretic universes, some in which $CH$ is true, some in which $\neg CH$ ...

**32**

votes

**5**answers

4k views

### Why do categorical foundationalists want to escape set theory?

This is a question that I have seen asked passively in comments relating to the separation of category theory from set theory, but I haven't seen it addressed in full.
I know that it's possible to ...

**7**

votes

**3**answers

886 views

### What are trig classes like within a universe that's “noticeably” hyperbolic?

[I want to think that this question has an answer, but it may be more a "community wiki" discussion. Feel free to re-tag.]
What are trig classes like within a universe that's "noticeably"[*] ...

**0**

votes

**1**answer

531 views

### Formal definition of 'useful' ?

Has anyone worked out a formal, general-enough definition of what is 'useful', so that it could reflectively be used in mathematics? I am aware of the work in utility theory from economics (but ...

**18**

votes

**7**answers

1k views

### Extensional theorems mostly used intensionally

Some theorems are stated and proved extensionally, but in practice are almost always used intensionally. Let me give an example to make this clear -- integration by parts:
$$ \int_a^b f(x)g'(x)ds = ...

**44**

votes

**9**answers

5k views

### How do they verify a verifier of formalized proofs?

In an unrelated thread Sam Nead intrigued me by mentioning a formalized proof of the Jordan curve theorem. I then found that there are at least two, made on two different systems. This is quite an ...

**2**

votes

**3**answers

1k views

### The problem of infinity [closed]

Background and motivation
The following is copied from my blog since someone thought it was the clearest statement I had made regarding a problem I recently posed. On their advice, it is a community ...

**-3**

votes

**2**answers

1k views

### Finite versus infinite on non-Hausdorff topologies [closed]

Question: Does there exist some real-valued function $f(x)$ where $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$, for which $\lim_{x \to \infty}$ converges on a non-Hausdorff topology but does not converge on a ...

**7**

votes

**5**answers

3k views

### Models of ZFC Set Theory - Getting Started

For just any first-order theory: What are the sets I am supposed/allowed to think of when thinking of models as sets (of something + additional structure)?
Provided:
I can think of models of any ...

**1**

vote

**4**answers

3k views

### Are all mathematical theorems necessarily true?

Define a formal tautology as a statement where by the nature of its atomic components there exists no truth-value assignment where it is not true. A contingent statement is a statement that is true by ...

**43**

votes

**2**answers

6k views

### Lawvere's “Some thoughts on the future of category theory.”

In Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1488, Lawvere writes the introduction to the Proceedings for a 1990 conference in Como.
In this article, Lawvere, the inventor of Toposes and Algebraic Theories, ...

**5**

votes

**1**answer

925 views

### Co-Objects are better [closed]

This is a rather vague question, but perhaps we can talk about it.
There are two types of mathematical objects (which don't exclude each other):
A) There is a good description of morphisms defined ...

**1**

vote

**2**answers

444 views

### In what sense Fraissean view point shows Model Theory can be done without any formal syntax and deduction rule?

In this post I want to look at an issue I was in doubt when looking at the comment of F. G. Dorais in the post In model theory, does compactness easily imply completeness?
F. G. Dorais remark was:
...

**11**

votes

**2**answers

829 views

### Where are we working when we prove metamathematical theorems?

I am posting my comment from this question as a separate question, as was recommended to me.
(EDIT: I'm sorry if it ended up being too similar a question, I just wanted to phrase it in the ...

**32**

votes

**5**answers

3k views

### Were Bourbaki committed to set-theoretical reductionism?

A set-theoretical reductionist holds that sets are the only abstract objects, and that (e.g.) numbers are identical to sets. (Which sets? A reductionist is a relativist if she is (e.g.) indifferent ...

**14**

votes

**10**answers

1k views

### Can you prove equivalence without being able to calculate it?

In mathematics we often seek to classify objects up to an equivalence relation, where two objects A and B are said to be equivalent if there exists a map $f:A\rightarrow B$ satisfying certain ...

**7**

votes

**3**answers

2k views

### randomness in nature [closed]

What is the explanation of the apparent randomness of high-level phenomena in nature?
For example the distribution of females vs. males in a population (I am referring to randomness in terms of the ...

**25**

votes

**3**answers

4k views

### Category of categories as a foundation of mathematics

In
Lawvere, F. W., 1966, “The Category of
Categories as a Foundation for
Mathematics”, Proceedings of the
Conference on Categorical Algebra, La
Jolla, New York: Springer-Verlag,
1–21.
...

**8**

votes

**3**answers

1k views

### categorification of logic

has there be an effort to categorify first order logic? More particularly, structures in the sense of logic.
If so, then every structure of a first order theory is a category. so in particular, the ...

**7**

votes

**4**answers

1k views

### Alternative axiom to induction

Is anyone aware of alternative axioms to induction? To be precise, consider peano axioms without induction PA-. Is there any axiom/axiom schema that is equiconsistent to induction, assuming PA-? If ...

**32**

votes

**5**answers

7k views

### Categorical foundations without set theory

Can there be a foundations of mathematics using only category theory, i.e. no set theory? More precisely, the definition of a category is a class/set of objects and a class/set of arrows, satisfying ...

**1**

vote

**4**answers

486 views

### Does the Golden Ratio Apply to Timing as Well? [closed]

I've seen the golden section applied to art, but does it apply to sound/timing as well? Just curious.

**14**

votes

**2**answers

958 views

### synthetic differential geometry and other alternative theories

There are models of differential geometry in which the intermediate value theorem is not true but every function is smooth. In fact I have a book sitting on my desk called "Models for Smooth ...

**4**

votes

**4**answers

5k views

### Badiou and Mathematics [closed]

Does anyone have an opinion on Alain Badiou's use of set theory? Is there anything interesting mathematically there? Also could anyone shed any light on the comment in the Wikipedia article link text ...

**3**

votes

**2**answers

481 views

### Broken Symmetry

I have a tangled web of ideas about natural transformations, vector spaces, equivalence classes, local coordinates, etc. in my head that I'm trying to unravel. So here are some of the questions I ...

**17**

votes

**8**answers

1k views

### The Importance of ZF

It seems as though many consider ZF to be the foundational set of axioms for all of mathematics (or at least, a crucial part of the foundations); when a theorem is found to be independent of ZF, it's ...

**10**

votes

**3**answers

2k views

### Math History Question about the exponential function

While tutoring a student recently, I have come across the situation of explain logarithms by first introducing functions of the form $$f(x)= a^x$$ where $a \ge 0,x\in \mathbb{R}$. My student then ...

**11**

votes

**3**answers

1k views

### Is formal proof (formalized mathematics) interesting to practicing mathematicians? To educators? [closed]

Formalizing mathematical proofs so that they can be checked for correctness and manipulated by computer is a recurrent proposal, most notably stated in the QED manifesto (1994). The December 2008 ...

**7**

votes

**2**answers

2k views

### How platonistic is your attitude towards mathematics? [closed]

A discussion in the n-category cafe
about Manin's 'emotional Platonism' made me wonder how such a perception of mathematics is distributed among mathematicians and how that influences attitudes ...

**-3**

votes

**2**answers

459 views

**13**

votes

**7**answers

2k views

### Is no proof based on “tertium non datur” sufficient any more after Gödel?

There are many proofs based on a "tertium non datur"-approach (e.g. prove that there exist two irrational numbers a and b such that a^b is rational).
But according to Gödel's First Incompleteness ...

**61**

votes

**10**answers

5k views

### Why do Groups and Abelian Groups feel so different?

Groups are naturally "the symmetries of an object". To me, the group axioms are just a way of codifying what the symmetries of an object can be so we can study it abstractly.
However, this heuristic ...