4
votes
0answers
125 views

$\infty$-Borel Determinacy?

An $\infty$-Borel set is a set $X\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ which has an $\infty$-Borel code - a set $r$ coding the construction of $X$ via open sets, complementation, and well-ordered unions (see ...
9
votes
0answers
210 views

cardinals below the critical point of a generic embedding

This may be an easy question. Are the cardinals below the critical point of a precipitous ideal embedding always absolute between the generic ultrapower and the generic extension? To focus on the ...
5
votes
0answers
362 views

Different approaches to the multiverse of sets

There are some different approaches to the multiverse of sets, in particular: 1) The approach by Woodin, 2) The approach by Sy Friedman, ..., 3) The approach by Hamkins. I wonder to know if ...
9
votes
1answer
296 views

Applications of SCH outside of set theory

Recall that the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis (SCH) says that if $\kappa$ is a singular cardinal and $2^{cf(\kappa)}<\kappa,$ then $\kappa^{cf(\kappa)}=\kappa^+.$ Clearly it has many applications ...
11
votes
0answers
295 views

Does every Aronszajn tree has a Suslin or a Special subtree?

Question: Does every $\omega_1$-Aronszajn tree contains a Suslin sub-tree or a special Aronszajn sub-tree? Recall that Suslin trees are $\omega_1$-trees (trees of height $\omega_1$, and countable ...
14
votes
2answers
395 views

Pathological behavior of Borel sets?

Usually in set theory, Borel sets are much more nicely behaved than arbitrary sets of reals. One reason for this is Borel determinacy, which immediately yields measurability, Baireness, and the ...
0
votes
0answers
12 views

the lexicographix order [migrated]

If it is given ordinals $\alpha$ and $\beta$, the lexicographix order on $\alpha \times \beta$,$\leq_{lex}$ is given by: $(\gamma_0,\delta_0)<_lex(\gamma_1,\delta_1)$ if and only if either ...
9
votes
0answers
211 views

Souslin trees and weakly compact cardinals

In Souslin trees on the first inaccessible cardinal it is asked if it is consistent that there are no $\kappa-$Souslin trees at the least inaccessible cardinal $\kappa$. In this question I would like ...
8
votes
2answers
246 views

The (non-)absoluteness of second-order elementary equivalence

Elementary equivalence is set-theoretically absolute between any two transitive models of set theory; this is also true for the infinitary logics - e.g., $\mathcal{L}_{\omega_1\omega}$ - at least, ...
6
votes
0answers
131 views

Canonical model for $\neg\mathsf{CH}$ and $\Omega$-logic

Recently I found this book by Woodin. In the introduction of it the author writes the following: The main result of this book is the identification of a canonical model in which the Continuum ...
5
votes
1answer
229 views

Woodin Cardinals and Inner Models

I have a few questions I have been thinking about that I could definitely use some insights on: Question 1. Since a Woodin cardinal is a "local" notion, defined with respect to some rank-initial ...
16
votes
2answers
432 views

Is the notion of fixed point property for topological spaces an absolute notion?

Recall that a topological space $X$ has the fixed point property (FPP) if any continuous function $f: X\to X$ has a fixed point. Is the notion of FPP for topological spaces an absolute notion? More ...
1
vote
1answer
271 views

Compactness and completeness in Gödel logic

The standard proof of the completeness theorem in first-order Gödel logic is based on a first-order countable language. I want to know that is there any proof of the completeness theorem in ...
4
votes
2answers
439 views

What set theoretical questions could never be answered by Turing machines of arbitrary cardinality?

Let us assume that there are Turing machines of arbitrary cardinality, by that I mean they can have input tapes of any arbitrarily high cardinality and compute for a number of steps also of ...
4
votes
1answer
199 views

Perfect set property implies $\omega_1$ is a limit cardinal in $L$

Specker proved in 1957 that if in $V$ every set of real numbers has the perfect set property, than in $L$, $\omega_1^V$ is actually a limit cardinal. The original proof is in German, and I've been ...
2
votes
0answers
97 views

Does the Lévy collapse obey this nice characterization? [duplicate]

This question is related to an issue in my answer to Monroe Eskew's question on the failure of Cantor-Bernstein for the Lévy collapse. Question. Is the Lévy collapse $\text{Coll}(\omega,\lt\kappa)$ ...
6
votes
1answer
161 views

Failure of Cantor-Bernstein for the Levy Collapse

Related to this question, is it possible to give an example of the failure of Cantor-Bernstein for complete embeddings of forcing notions involving the Levy Collapse $Col(\omega,<\kappa)$? Suppose ...
5
votes
1answer
204 views

A model of Krivine

In a paper by J.-L. Krivine, Modèles de ZF+AC dans lesquels tout ensemble de réels définissable en termes d'ordinaux est mesurable-Lebesgue [C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 269 (1969), A549–A552, ...
2
votes
1answer
110 views

How many elementary equivalent models are unifiable by ultrapower?

Definition. A class $\mathcal{C}$ of pairwise elementary equivalent $\mathcal{L}$-structures is unifiable by ultrapower if there is an index set $I$ and an ultrafilter $F$ on it such that $\forall ...
9
votes
4answers
1k views

Are there non-diagonal proofs for Cantor's continuum and Godel's incompletness theorems?

There is a formal definition for the notion of a formal proof. Question 1. Is there any formal definition for the notion of a diagonal formal proof? Consider the following theorems both proved by ...
9
votes
1answer
173 views

Obtaining a lightface pointclass from a boldface one

Define a pointclass to be: boldface inductive-like if it is $\mathbb{R}$-parameterized, has the scale property, and is closed under $\wedge$, $\vee$, $\forall^\mathbb{R}$, $\exists^\mathbb{R}$, and ...
9
votes
3answers
734 views

Is it ever a good idea to use Keisler-Shelah to show elementary equivalence?

The most useful way I know to show that two structures are elementarily equivalent is Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse games. These are quite nice and intuitive, and even when I can't use them to solve my problem ...
5
votes
1answer
182 views

A ZFC construction to get a proper extension which is a $\omega_1$-model

In $V$, let me call a set theory structure A is a $\omega_1$ model if the $\omega_1$ of $A$ is the same as the $\omega_1$ in $V$ (up to isomorphism). The question I would like to ask is the following: ...
6
votes
1answer
163 views

Skolem Hulls in $H_{\omega_2}$

I put this on stack exchange over a week ago with no answer, so let's try here. Consider a model of the form $\mathfrak{A} = (H_{\omega_2}, \in, \lhd, f_0, f_1, ...)$, some expansion of ...
7
votes
2answers
220 views

Vaught's conjecture for partial orders

In ``Steel, John R. On Vaught's conjecture. Cabal Seminar 76–77, pp. 193–208'' the following is proved: Theorem. Let $\phi\in L_{\omega_1,\omega}.$ If every model of $\phi$ is a tree, then $\phi$ has ...
4
votes
2answers
260 views

Forcing for Arbitrary First Order Theories

Forcing is a relative model construction method for models of $ZF$ as a particular first order theory using models of another first order theory (forcing companion) that in this case is the theory of ...
6
votes
1answer
123 views

Intermediate submodels which do not satisfy AC

The following is known: Theorem. Suppose $V[G]$ is a generic extension of $V$ by a set forcing, and let $N$ be a model of $ZFC$ with $V\subseteq N\subseteq V[G].$ Then $N$ is a generic extension of ...
2
votes
0answers
149 views

How many Dedekind-finite sets can $\mathbb{R}$ be partitioned into?

Building off Asaf Karagila's answer to my previous question (Can $\mathbb{R}$ be partitioned into dedekind-finite sets?) on partitioning $\mathbb{R}$ into strictly Dedekind-finite sets: (1) What ...
-1
votes
1answer
150 views

Algebra generated by a tree [Edit] [closed]

Suppose that $(T,\leq)$ is a partially ordered set, we say $T$ is a tree* if for every $i\in T$, $\{s: s\in T, s\leq t\}$ is a well-founded chain. What I need to know is: Can the algebra ...
11
votes
4answers
818 views

Weak forms of the Axiom of Choice

Let $n\geq 2$ be a natural number and consider the following: $AC(n)$: For each family $\{X_i\}_{i \in I}$ of $n$-element sets the product $\prod_{i\in I}X_i$ is non-empty. Is it known that for ...
8
votes
1answer
221 views

Can $\mathbb{R}$ be partitioned into dedekind-finite sets?

Assuming $ZF$ itself is consistent, it is consistent that there are sets $D$ which are infinite but cannot be placed in bijection with any of their proper subsets; such sets are called "strictly ...
4
votes
1answer
180 views

Climbing quickly up $L$

This question is motivated by Joel David Hamkins' answer to Godel's Constructible Universe in Infinitary Logics (A Possible Approach to HOD Problem), in which he shows that, if we replace ...
15
votes
1answer
820 views

Gödel's Constructible Universe in Infinitary Logics (A Possible Approach to HOD Problem)

Gödel's constructible universe ($L$) is defined using definable power set operator in first order logic ($\mathcal{L}_{\omega ,\omega}$). One can produce such a universe in infinitary logics in ...
8
votes
3answers
274 views

Who proved “sets in every generic are already in the ground model?”

Suppose $\mathbb{P}$ is a notion of forcing in the ground model $V$, and $X$ is a set which is in $V[G]$ for every $\mathbb{P}$-generic filter $G$. Then $X\in V$ already, by a fairly simple (if ...
21
votes
4answers
843 views

What is the definition of a large cardinal axiom?

In different books one can find different implicit definitions for a large cardinal axiom. My question is that which one of these definitions are more popular or standard amongst set theorists? Any ...
5
votes
3answers
552 views

PFA: A New Godel's Program & A New Large Cardinal Ladder (Updated)

We know $PFA$ implies $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_2$. Q1. What does $PFA$ say about other values of continuum function? Does proper forcing axiom carry any further information about values of continuum ...
7
votes
1answer
227 views

Are superstrong stronger than strongly compact cardinals? (or vice versa)

In the last part of Kanamori's excellent "The Higher Infinite" there is a small diagram about the strength and consistency strength of some major large cardinal axioms. Below supercompact cardinals ...
8
votes
1answer
206 views

Genericity by names

If $P$ is a notion of forcing in $M$, then $G$ is a $P$-generic filter over $M$ if $G\subseteq P$ is a filter, and for every $D\in M$ which is a dense subset of $P$, $G\cap D\neq\varnothing$. ...
1
vote
0answers
108 views

Dedekind reals in heyting valued models

Let $V^{H}$ be a Heyting valued model of intuitionistic set theory. What conditions does $H$ have to satisfy in order for the following claim to hold? (where $\| \phi(u) \| \in H$ is the truth value ...
7
votes
0answers
272 views

“Hard” separation results in reverse mathematics (or similar)

This is a fairly broad question. In particular, I specify 5 questions (Q1, Q2.1, Q2.2, Q3, Q4) which for me all fall under one umbrella. Since this is unreasonably broad, I'm really interested in an ...
21
votes
1answer
372 views

When does the choice of the generic matter?

It is a somewhat curious phenomenon that, in forcing arguments, one usually doesn't care about any particular properties of the generic filter being used (this isn't strictly true; there are cases ...
25
votes
3answers
938 views

Latest stand of core model theory?

What is the "strongest" core model to this day? In particular, how far are we from a core model for supercompact cardinals? There are rumors of some notes from a workshop in 2004: ...
11
votes
2answers
456 views

Can we force the existence of this function?

I want to see if it is possible to force the existence of a function $F:\aleph_2 \times \aleph_2\rightarrow \aleph_1$ such that: a) $F(a,b)=F(b,a)$, for all $a,b\in \aleph_2$ and b) for all ...
2
votes
0answers
90 views

Stability of analytic Zariski structures

Noetherian Zariski structures are introduced by Hrushovski and Zilber.(1996) An analytic Zariski structure is a generalization of Noetherian Zariski structures, introduced by Zilber and Peatfield. ...
10
votes
1answer
218 views

Is “approximate categoricity” absolute?

Let $T$ be a countable first-order theory, and assume that $T$ has exactly one atomic model up to isomorphism in every uncountable cardinality. (By "atomic" I mean a model which omits the ...
6
votes
1answer
224 views

Recursive ordinals and the minimal standard model of ZF

Does the minimal standard model of ZF contain all recursive ordinals or is it limited (probably by the proof theoretic ordinal of ZF as I suspect but cannot prove)? Paul J. Cohen's definition of the ...
0
votes
0answers
72 views

Uncountable models of set theory [duplicate]

Assume we have a countable transitive model of set theory which satisfies some set of first-order axioms $T$. Is it possible to get from this a model $\mathcal{M}$ of set theory which satisfies the ...
4
votes
1answer
182 views

Bad subforcings of nice forcing notions

Let $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ be two forcing notions. Recall that we say $\mathbb{Q}$ is a subforcing of $\mathbb{P}$ if there exists a regular embedding $\mathbb{Q} \to \text{r.o.}(\mathbb{P}).$ ...
10
votes
1answer
315 views

V=HOD & The Height of the Large Cardinal Tree

As we know the assumption $V=L$ adds a restriction on the height of the large cardinal tree. Also there is a strict border like $0^{\sharp}$ exists such that all large cardinal axioms which are ...
6
votes
1answer
362 views

Is there a suitably generalized Baire property for topological spaces of arbitrary cardinalities?

Is there some suitable generalization to the notion of Baire property for topological spaces of arbitrary cardinalities which satisfies the following condition: The meager sets are sets which are ...