The large-cardinals tag has no wiki summary.

**31**

votes

**7**answers

5k views

### Arguments against large cardinals

I started to learn about large cardinals a while ago, and I read that the existence, and even the consistency of the existence of an inaccessible cardinal, i.e. a limit cardinal which is additionally ...

**15**

votes

**2**answers

2k views

### Large cardinal axioms and Grothendieck universes

A cardinal $\lambda$ is weakly inaccessible, iff a. it is regular (i.e. a set of cardinality $\lambda$ can't be represented as a union of sets of cardinality $<\lambda$ indexed by a set of ...

**14**

votes

**2**answers

726 views

### Questions about $\aleph_1-$closed forcing notions

"Foreman`s maximality principle" states that every non-trivial forcing notion either adds a real or collapses some cardinals. This principle has many consequences including:
1) $GCH$ fails ...

**15**

votes

**1**answer

873 views

### Gödel's Constructible Universe in Infinitary Logics (A Possible Approach to HOD Problem)

Gödel's constructible universe ($L$) is defined using definable power set operator in first order logic ($\mathcal{L}_{\omega ,\omega}$). One can produce such a universe in infinitary logics in ...

**9**

votes

**3**answers

775 views

### How elementary can we go?

It is a theorem of A. Levy, if $\kappa$ is an inaccessible cardinal, then $V_\kappa\prec_{\Sigma_1} V$ namely $V_\kappa$ is an elementary submodel when considering only $\Sigma_1$ sentences.
One ...

**7**

votes

**0**answers

423 views

### A proposed axiom of Laver (updated)

A few months back, I posted a question asking about a proposed axiom of Laver's and I, unfortunately, left out a critical piece. Here is the full axiom:
(L) Some elementary embedding ...

**7**

votes

**2**answers

398 views

### What can the degrees of constructibility be?

If $r, s\in\mathbb{R}$, we say $r$ is constructible relative to $s$ - and write $r\le_cs$ - if $r\in L[s]$. Modding out by the induced equivalence relation $\equiv_c$, we get a partial order, the ...

**10**

votes

**2**answers

526 views

### What are Moschovakis cardinals?

The question is exactly that of the title: what are Moschovakis cardinals?
Background. In a recent answer to the question, "Are there examples of statements that have been proven whose consistency ...

**6**

votes

**0**answers

192 views

### Does Sageev's result need an inaccessible?

In 1981, building on work by Ellentuck in 1974, Sageev showed ("A model of ZF + there exists an inaccessible, in which the Dedekind cardinals constitute a natural non-standard model of arithmetic," ...

**17**

votes

**6**answers

2k views

### Reasons to believe Vopenka's principle/huge cardinals are consistent

There are a number of informal heuristic arguments for the consistency of ZFC, enough that I am happy enough to believe that ZFC is consistent. This is true for even some of the more tame large ...

**17**

votes

**2**answers

3k views

### Recent claim that inaccessibles are inconsistent with ZF

Here it is mentioned that someone claims to have proven that there are no weakly inaccessibles in ZF.
Question 1: What reasons are there to believe that weakly inaccessibles exist?
Question(s) 2: ...

**16**

votes

**2**answers

719 views

### Woodin's unpublished proof of the global failure of GCH

An unpublished result of Woodin says the following:
Theorem. Assuming the existence of large cardinals, it is consistent that $\forall \lambda, 2^{\lambda}=\lambda^{++}.$
In the paper "The ...

**22**

votes

**4**answers

964 views

### What is the definition of a large cardinal axiom?

In different books one can find different implicit definitions for a large cardinal axiom.
My question is that which one of these definitions are more popular or standard amongst set theorists?
Any ...

**9**

votes

**2**answers

343 views

### Failure of diamond at large cardinals

What is known about the failure of $\diamond_{\kappa}$ (diamond at $\kappa$) for $\kappa$ (the least) inaccessible, (the least) Mahlo and (the least) weakly compact.

**6**

votes

**3**answers

703 views

### Tractability of forcing-invariant statements under large cardinals

It is usual to mention theorems of the kind:
Th. Assume there is a proper class of Woodin cardinals, $\mathbb{P} $ is a partial order and $G \subseteq \mathbb{P}$ is V-generic, then $V \models \phi ...

**13**

votes

**2**answers

433 views

### Singularizing forcing of “small” cardinality?

Can there be a large cardinal $\kappa$ and a forcing of size $\kappa$ that makes $\kappa$ a singular cardinal? The motivation is that the standard Prikry forcing does not have a dense set of size ...

**6**

votes

**1**answer

299 views

### Vopenka's Theorem on L(A) and Large Cardinals from Weaker Assumptions?

I know that sometime ago Vopenka proved this:
Theorem: Assume there is a strongly compact cardinal. Then for any set $A$, $V \neq L(A)$.
Can we get by with a consistency-wise strictly weaker ...

**12**

votes

**1**answer

188 views

### extending elementary embeddings from initial segments of V to all of V

Suppose $j:V_\lambda \rightarrow V_\eta$ is (elementary and) cofinal. Can $j$ be extended to all of $V$?
(Subsidiary question: What conditions are there on an ultrafilter/extender/whatever so that ...

**11**

votes

**1**answer

320 views

### Is the inclusion version of Kunen inconsistency theorem true?

The relations $\in$ and $\subsetneq$ seem so similar in some sense. For example they are equal on ordinal numbers. So there is a natural question about their possible similar behaviors on the ...

**10**

votes

**1**answer

377 views

### How strong is the iterated consistency of ZFC?

Let $T_0$ be $\mathsf{ZFC}$ and, for $n\in\omega$, set $T_{n +1}=T_{n}+\mathrm{Con}(T_{n})$.
Question 1: Is there a natural number $n$ such that $T_{n}$ is equiconsistent with $\mathsf{ZFC}+$ ...

**9**

votes

**1**answer

282 views

### Inner model in which every uncountable cardinal is large

The following is known:
$(*)$ If $0^\sharp$ exists, then any uncountable cardinal is is an inaccessible cardinal (and even more) in $L$.
My question is that:
Are there any large cardinal ...

**9**

votes

**4**answers

680 views

### On the large cardinals foundations of categories

(This question was posted on math.SE over two weeks ago, but received no answer. I am therefore posting it here as well.)
It is well-known that there are difficulties in developing basic category ...

**8**

votes

**1**answer

262 views

### Elementary Embeddings and Relative Constructibility

Suppose $$j:M\prec N$$ is a non-trivial elementary embedding. Under what conditions on the sets (classes?) $M$ and $N$ (or even the critical point of $j$) does $j$ extend to an elementary embedding ...

**8**

votes

**2**answers

664 views

### Model of ZF + $\neg$C in which Solovay's Theorem on stationary sets fails?

It is a theorem of Solovay that any stationary subset of a regular cardinal, $\kappa$ can be decomposed into a disjoint union of $\kappa$ many disjoint stationary sets. As far as I know, the proof ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

388 views

### Why “adding” a single extender cannot give an L-like inner model for say, a strong cardinal?

The constructible universe $L$ is too thin for large cardinals greater than measurable. To build $L$-like inner models for large cardinal, it is natural to think about "adding" the evidences into the ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

522 views

### Are there large cardinals for $n$-elementarity?

In July, Asaf Karagila asked three questions about elementary substructures of the universe of sets. The latter two were answered, the upshot being that the hypothesis $V_\kappa \prec V$ doesn't alone ...

**7**

votes

**5**answers

738 views

### Measurable cardinals under Axiom of Determinacy

I seem to remember reading somewhere that ZF+AD proves that omega-1 and omega-2 are measurable cardinals.
Is that right?
If so, can someone [point me to or give here] a [sketch or proof] of these ...

**6**

votes

**1**answer

251 views

### Are larger large cardinals less expressible?

First note to the following well known theorems:
Theorem (1): The notion of "$x$ is a strongly inaccessible cardinal" is first order expressible and $\Pi_{1}$.
Theorem (2): ...

**6**

votes

**1**answer

1k views

### Aleph 0 as a large cardinal

The first infinite cardinal, $\aleph_0$, has many large cardinal properties (or would have many large cardinal properties if not deliberately excluded). For example, if you do not impose ...

**10**

votes

**2**answers

580 views

### Questions about Prikry forcing and Cohen forcing

I have some questions.
The first one is about the product of Prikry's forcing.
Let $\kappa$ be a measurable cardinal, $U_1, U_2$ be normal measures on $\kappa$ and let $\mathbb{P}_{U_1}, ...

**6**

votes

**3**answers

528 views

### Very Large Cardinal Axioms and Continuum Hypothesis

Are very large cardinal axioms like $I_0$, $I_1$, $I_2$ consistent with $CH$ and $GCH$?

**5**

votes

**1**answer

150 views

### Covering properties of strongly compact embedding

Let $\kappa$ be a $\mu$-strongly compact cardinal, which means that there is an elementary embedding $j:V\rightarrow M$, with critical point $\kappa$ such that $M$ is well founded (even closed under ...

**13**

votes

**3**answers

359 views

### Is Prikry forcing minimal?

Let $M$ be a model of $\sf ZFC$ in which $\kappa$ is a measurable cardinal, and $\cal U$ is a normal measure on $\kappa$. We can define the Prikry forcing (the most simple one) as the poset: $$\Bbb ...

**3**

votes

**2**answers

387 views

### A question about “local” versus “global” large cardinal axioms

The terms "local" and "global" when applied to large cardinal axioms seem to have a well understood intuitive meaning, although a formalized definition of them in (a meta-language for)ZFC might be ...

**2**

votes

**2**answers

168 views

### Preservation of measurable cardinals in mild extensions

I would like some help with the proof of the preservation of measurable cardinals in mild extensions, as I am a bit new with forcing.
By mild extensions, I mean the generic extension produced from a ...

**-2**

votes

**1**answer

138 views

### is the existence of an inaccessible cardinal stronger than just CON(ZFC)? [closed]

is it even stronger than that ZFC has a transtitive model?