The large-cardinals tag has no usage guidance.

**4**

votes

**1**answer

234 views

### Extending complete filters

Suppose $\kappa$ is a measurable cardinal and let $\mathcal{F}\subset\wp(\kappa)$ be a $\kappa$-complete non-principal filter. Can we extend $\mathcal{F}$ to a $\kappa$-complete ultrafilter?
My ...

**6**

votes

**1**answer

184 views

### $\Delta^1_2$-well ordering vs $\Delta^1_3$

It is a classical result that if $0^{\sharp}$ exists, then there is a model of $ZFC$ in which there is a $\Delta^1_3$ well ordering of reals but no $\Delta^1_2$-well ordering.
My question is: Is ...

**4**

votes

**1**answer

174 views

### Two complementing consequences of supercompactness

I would like to know if the following two consequences of having a supercompact cardinal are orthogonal:
1) On one hand being supercompact is equivalent to being "A ineffable for all A" ...

**7**

votes

**2**answers

316 views

### Relation between $\neg \square(\kappa)$ and the tree property at $\kappa$.

If $\kappa$ is an inaccessible cardinal then the tree property at $\kappa$ is equivalent to weak compactness of $\kappa$, which implies that $\square(\kappa)$ fails---that is, that every coherent ...

**13**

votes

**2**answers

695 views

### Can measures be added by forcing?

The Lévy-Solovay theorem says that small forcings do not create measures. J.D. Hamkins has generalized this to a larger class of forcings called gap forcings. I would assume this cannot be ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

345 views

### A question about the comparability of large cardinals.

Are there any examples of two large cardinal axioms $AX$ and $AY$, in the language of first order $ZFC$, which satisfy the following conditions.
Each of them defines a unique cardinal number - ...

**2**

votes

**0**answers

370 views

### large cardinal tree properties as properties of sheaves

As follows from this talk Large Properties for Small Cardinals, p.7,p.4 http://www2.dm.unito.it/paginepersonali/viale/SEMINARS-TORINO/Fontanella-Torino-19.1.2012.pdf, the definitions of weakly compact ...

**3**

votes

**0**answers

253 views

### Internal large cardinal embeddings. How deep can we go?

Suppose, in V, that $\kappa$ is a large cardinal, say $\kappa$ is supercompact, and $j:V \to M$ is an ultrapower embedding witnessing the large cardinal properties of $\kappa$. From here, we can take ...

**10**

votes

**1**answer

431 views

### Generic Extensions and $L(V_{\lambda+1})$

Suppose $\lambda$ is a strong limit cardinal of cofinality $\omega$ and for $A$ a transitive set, define $L(A)$ in the usual fashion by setting
$$L_0(A)=A;$$
$$L_{\alpha+1}(A) = L_\alpha (A)\cup ...

**2**

votes

**0**answers

196 views

### a partial order not dense iff a measurable exists

For $\kappa>0$ a regular cardinal, let $Ht_\kappa$ denote the following partial quasi-order:
(i) elements(objects) of $Ht_\kappa$ are classes X of sets of size $\kappa$
with the property that,
...

**8**

votes

**1**answer

405 views

### Can $\omega_1$ be supercompact?

Is "ZF + $\omega_1$ is supercompact" consistent relative to "ZFC + there is a supercompact cardinal"?
In particular, if $\delta$ is supercompact, does it remain so in $V(\mathbb{R} \cap V[G])$ where ...

**13**

votes

**1**answer

1k views

### What's the difference between ZFC+Grothendieck, ZFC+inaccessible cardinals and Tarski-Grothendieck set theory?

Say that "U" is the axiom that "For each set x, there exists a Grothendieck universe U such that x $\in$ U", where Grothendieck universes are defined in the usual way (or, if that's unclear, in this ...

**5**

votes

**2**answers

284 views

### Measures that are not OD

Is anything known about the consistency strength of the statement:
"There is a normal measure (on a cardinal) that is not ordinal-definable"?
In particular, is it consistent relative to the ...

**20**

votes

**2**answers

1k views

### Can there be an embedding j:V to L, from the set-theoretic universe V to the constructible universe L, when V not= L?

Main Question. Can there be an embedding $j:V\to L$ of the
set-theoretic universe $V$ to the constructible universe $L$, if
$V\neq L$?
By embedding here, I mean merely a proper class isomorphism from
...

**4**

votes

**2**answers

763 views

### Large cardinals without the ambient set theory?

In an attempt to understand a bit better large cardinals, I have been thinking along the following lines, which could be summarized under the slogan
Talk about cardinals without the
(ambient) ...

**7**

votes

**8**answers

2k views

### ULTRAINFINITISM, or a step beyond the transfinite

Cantor has, in the immortal words of D. Hilbert, given all of us a paradise (or perhaps, I would rather say, a great vacation spot), the TRANSFINITE.
$\aleph_0, \aleph_1,\aleph_2\dots$
the lists ...

**8**

votes

**2**answers

492 views

### Large cardinal axioms and total recursive functions

Are there known relationships between large cardinal axioms (say Mahlo or Woodin cardinals)
and total recursive functions (over the natural numbers) of the type:
$ZFC$ + large cardinal axiom $\vdash$ ...

**5**

votes

**1**answer

451 views

### An Extender is a Generalization of an Ultrafilter?

I'm not sure whether this belongs here or on math stackexchange, but I'll give a try here.
I've heard that an extender is a generalization of an ultrafilter. This is not to say that an ultrafilter ...

**6**

votes

**1**answer

352 views

### Vopenka's Theorem on L(A) and Large Cardinals from Weaker Assumptions?

I know that sometime ago Vopenka proved this:
Theorem: Assume there is a strongly compact cardinal. Then for any set $A$, $V \neq L(A)$.
Can we get by with a consistency-wise strictly weaker ...

**21**

votes

**0**answers

842 views

### Supercompact and Reinhardt cardinals without choice

A friend of mine and I ran into the following question while reading about proper forcing, and have been unable to resolve it:
Definition. A cardinal $\kappa$ is supercompact if for all ordinals ...

**9**

votes

**1**answer

363 views

### What can we learn about an elementary embedding from the image of the ordinals?

If $j : V \rightarrow M$ is an elementary embedding, what can we learn in $M$ from $j''ORD$? That is, what is $M[j''ORD]$?
In particular,
Is it $M[j''ORD]$ equal to all of $V$?
If not, do we ...

**3**

votes

**0**answers

265 views

### On Successive Regular Cardinals With No Ladders

Definition: Let $\kappa$ be an $\aleph$ cardinal, we say that $\langle f_\alpha\colon\alpha\to\kappa\mid\alpha<\kappa^+\rangle$ is a ladder if every $f_\alpha$ is injective.
Equivalently this is ...

**3**

votes

**2**answers

603 views

### Set Cardinality Game - Can a player with numbers in R win over a player with numbers in N as each of them in one turn has to present a new number?

Let there be 2 players, p$\mathbb{N}$ and p$\mathbb{R}$. They are playing the Set Cardinality Game where p$\mathbb{N}$ has to present some number n that has not been used in the game so far by either ...

**11**

votes

**4**answers

1k views

### What sort of large cardinal can $\aleph_1$ be without the axiom of choice?

Assuming the axiom of choice it is very easy to see that $\aleph_1$ is a regular Joe of a successor cardinal. It is not very large in any way except the fact that it is the first uncountable cardinal.
...

**17**

votes

**4**answers

1k views

### What are the known implications of “There exists a Reinhardt cardinal” in the theory “ZF + j”?

This is, alas, in large part a series of questions on unpublished work of Hugh Woodin; it's also quite frivolous if Reinhardt cardinals turn out inconsistent.
Definitions:
Call $\kappa$ an ...

**6**

votes

**1**answer

377 views

### GCH+ Kurepa Families

I have a couple of questions about known theorems for GCH+Kurepa families.
Definition first: Let $\kappa$ be a infinite cardinal. A $\kappa^+$ Kurepa family is a family $F$ of subsets of $\kappa^+$ ...

**15**

votes

**2**answers

1k views

### Why does inner model theory need so much descriptive set theory (and vice versa)?

I am curious about how much descriptive set theory is involved in inner model theory.
For instance Shoenfield's absoluteness result is based on the construction of the Shoenfield tree which ...

**13**

votes

**0**answers

398 views

### How to prove projective determinacy (PD) from I0?

Martin and Steel (in 1987?) showed that if there are infinite many Woodin cardinals then every projective set of reals is determined (PD).
However, it is mentioned in many texts that in 1983/1984 ...

**12**

votes

**1**answer

898 views

### Large cardinal axiom: everything that happen once must happen an unbounded number of times

I remember reading something about a large cardinal axiom saying something like
If some cardinal $\kappa$ has some property $P$, then there should be a proper class of cardinals with the property ...

**4**

votes

**2**answers

285 views

### End extensions of models which do not preserve axioms

Assuming the axiom of choice there is a neat way defining inaccessible cardinals as uncountable, regular, strong limit cardinals.
Without the axiom of choice we have several notions of ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

437 views

### Why “adding” a single extender cannot give an L-like inner model for say, a strong cardinal?

The constructible universe $L$ is too thin for large cardinals greater than measurable. To build $L$-like inner models for large cardinal, it is natural to think about "adding" the evidences into the ...

**4**

votes

**1**answer

641 views

### Some questions from the paper “Forcing the failure of CH by adding a real” by Shelah and Woodin

1-Let $P=Add(\omega_1, \kappa)$, and let $D$ be a dense open subset of $P$. Then there is a dense subset $S$ of $D$ such that for every $f \in S$ and any $g \in P$, if $domf=domg$ and the set $\{ ...

**15**

votes

**1**answer

1k views

### Devlin's “Constructibility” as a resource

It is fairly well-known among set-theorists that Keith Devlin's 1984 book "Constructibility" has flaws in its initial development of fine structure theory. (See Lee Stanley's review 1 of the text for ...

**10**

votes

**1**answer

330 views

### Do indiscernibility embeddings exist for an initial segment of an inner model of many measurable cardinals?

Background
I am interested in elementary embeddings from a model of set theory into itself. One way of producing such elementary embeddings is when the model is generated by indiscernibles; this idea ...

**7**

votes

**0**answers

387 views

### $\Pi_0^1$-weakly indescribable cardinals are exactly the regulars

Hi,
I'm not sure if I should ask here or over at math.stackexchange.com, but I think here it's a bit more fitting. This question stems from a homework problem:
Definition:
Given some class of ...

**6**

votes

**0**answers

431 views

### A proposed axiom of Laver (updated)

A few months back, I posted a question asking about a proposed axiom of Laver's and I, unfortunately, left out a critical piece. Here is the full axiom:
(L) Some elementary embedding ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

600 views

### Are there large cardinals for $n$-elementarity?

In July, Asaf Karagila asked three questions about elementary substructures of the universe of sets. The latter two were answered, the upshot being that the hypothesis $V_\kappa \prec V$ doesn't alone ...

**6**

votes

**0**answers

306 views

### PFA and the compactness/incompactness of $\omega_2$

There are many consequences of the Proper Forcing Axiom (PFA) which essentially say that $\omega_2$ has a lot of compactness.
For instance, Matteo Viale and Christoph Weiss have a few papers in ...

**6**

votes

**2**answers

451 views

### Characterizing elementary embeddings of $L$ and $L_\alpha$ under 0#

Suppose 0# exists.
It is clear that every order preserving map from the indiscernibles to the indiscernibles gives an elementary embedding from $L$ to $L$. Furthermore, following lemmas 18.7 and 18.8 ...

**18**

votes

**2**answers

3k views

### Recent claim that inaccessibles are inconsistent with ZF

Here it is mentioned that someone claims to have proven that there are no weakly inaccessibles in ZF.
Question 1: What reasons are there to believe that weakly inaccessibles exist?
Question(s) 2: ...

**4**

votes

**2**answers

211 views

### Relation between indiscernibles for $L$ and for $L[A]$

It is known that $L\models 2^\kappa=\kappa^+$, and that for a set of ordinals $A$ we know that $L[A]\models \exists\lambda\forall\kappa>\lambda(2^\kappa=\kappa^+)$.
In this sense, there is some ...

**5**

votes

**2**answers

378 views

### Ultrapowers by normalized ultrafilters

Suppose $j\colon V\to M$ is an elementary embedding and $\kappa$ is the critical point of $j$, then $\kappa$ is measurable, and we can define the ultrafilter $U$ over $\kappa$ as: $$A\in U\iff ...

**3**

votes

**2**answers

258 views

### Dual covering theorem

Jensen's covering theorem states that if $0^\sharp$ doesn't exist, then every uncountable set of ordinals can be covered by a constructible set of the same cardinality.
Now consider the following ...

**10**

votes

**3**answers

877 views

### How elementary can we go?

It is a theorem of A. Levy, if $\kappa$ is an inaccessible cardinal, then $V_\kappa\prec_{\Sigma_1} V$ namely $V_\kappa$ is an elementary submodel when considering only $\Sigma_1$ sentences.
One ...

**10**

votes

**1**answer

396 views

### Consistency strengths related to the perfect set property

I want a model of $\mathrm{MA}_{\sigma\mathrm{-centered}}+\neg\mathrm{CH}$ in which every set of reals in $L(\mathbb{R})$ has the perfect set property. In terms of consistency strength, it is known ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

704 views

### Large cardinals and constructible universe

We know that if $V=L$ holds, then $|\cal{P}(\omega)|=|\cal{P}(\omega)\cap \textrm{L}|=\aleph_1$ whereas, in the presence of a measurable cardinal (in fact, even Ramsey) $|\cal{P}(\omega)\cap ...

**9**

votes

**2**answers

634 views

### Why is this theorem (about $L(P(\omega_1))^V$ and $L(P(\omega_1))^{V[G]}$) nice?

I was recently told that the following (due to M. Viale) is a nice theorem:
Suppose there are arbitrarily large supercompacts, and $\mathrm{MM}$ holds in $V$. Let $G$ be generic for a proper ...

**4**

votes

**1**answer

341 views

### Adding large sets by countable conditions preserving the GCH

Let $\kappa$ be an inaccessible cardinal. Is there any forcing notion $P$ with the following properties:
1-$P$ preserves GCH and the strong inaccessibility of $\kappa$,
2-$P$ adds a subset of ...

**4**

votes

**1**answer

257 views

### $< \aleph_1-$support Product of Cohen forcings

Suppose $\kappa$ is an inaccessible cardinal, and let $P$ be the $< \aleph_1-$support product of $Add(\alpha^{++}, 1)$ for singular cardinals $\alpha < \kappa.$
1- Does this forcing preserve ...

**11**

votes

**4**answers

789 views

### Is there a least-fixed-point formulation of inaccessible cardinals?

The infinity axiom can be formulated by defining a function $S$ as
$$S(N) = \{0\} \cup \{n+1\\ |\\ n \in N\}$$
(FWIW, I'm assuming the von Neumann ordinals.) The axiom is then
$$\exists I . I = ...