# Tagged Questions

**0**

votes

**0**answers

84 views

### Arthur's refinement of parameters for unitary automorphic representations

In his work on the classification of automorphic representations of a group $G$, Arthur has conjectured that the parameterization of such representations involves a homomorphism $\rho : SL_2 \times ...

**19**

votes

**2**answers

1k views

### Current Status on Langlands Program

The Langlands Program was launched almost fifty years ago, and progress has been made gradually, much of it hard earned. Langlands himself wrote a survey on the functoriality conjecture in 1997, Where ...

**1**

vote

**0**answers

140 views

### Langlands correspondence for reducible representations

The Langlands correspondence over a function field matches irreducible $n$-dimensional Galois representations with cuspidal irreducible automorphic representations.
My question is: Is there any idea ...

**0**

votes

**1**answer

228 views

### Reference on Casselman-Shalika formula for GL(n) and PGL(n)?

I am looking for reference on Casselman-Shalika formula for GL(n) and PGL(n) at finite place p.

**2**

votes

**0**answers

255 views

### Complex Finite Dimensional Representation of GL(N,C)

What are all the complex finite dimensional linear representation of $GL(N,\mathbb{C})$?
We already know all the complex finite dimensional linear representation of SU(N).

**2**

votes

**0**answers

200 views

### Local counterpart of the NON-Hitchin Hecke eigen-sheaves ?

Insight of Beilinson and Drinfeld at early 90-ies - that Hitchin's D-modules are Hecke eigen-D-modules. However they are NOT all Hecke-eigensmodules and actually they are only the half-dimensional ...

**11**

votes

**1**answer

1k views

### What is the relation between L. Lafforgue and Frenkel-Gaitsgory-Vilonen results on Langlands correspondence ?

What is the relation between Lafforgue's result on Langlands
and Frenkel-Gaitsgory-Vilonen ? ( http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0012255 , http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0204081 )
Does one imply other ? If not ...

**4**

votes

**1**answer

1k views

### Why is the Arthur trace formula so powerful?

Considering the Arthur trace formula, why are the sort of convolution operators, whose "normalized traces" are given in geometric terms and spectral terms, actually able to distinguish all automorphic ...

**4**

votes

**2**answers

618 views

### Why is the simple trace formula a weaker tool than the Arthur trace formula?

What are some concrete examples of theorems which can be deduced from the Arthur trace formula, which do not follow from the simple trace of Kazdhan and Flicker?
(So I do not mean weaker in the sense ...