The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
1answer
71 views

solution uniqueness of non-linear Fredholm equations

the equation is $F(x)=G(\int k(x,y)f(y)dy)$ $(*)$ where $f(x)=dF(x)/dx$ is the unknown and it's required to be non-negative. With integral by parts we'll have the form of a non-linear Fredholm ...
6
votes
0answers
163 views

Density of odd and even eigenstates of an integral operator

Consider an integral operator $(Kf)(x)=\int_{-1}^{1}K(x-y)f(y)dy$, where the kernel $K(-x)=K(x)$ is an even function. Let $\lambda_n$ be the ordered eigenvalues of $K$ and $f_n(x)$ the ...
2
votes
0answers
91 views

Estimating singular values of integral operators

I would like to estimate the singular values of certain trace class integral operators. For the sake of concreteness, consider on $L^2({\mathbb R},dx)$ the integral operator $$(Tf)(x)=\int_{\mathbb ...
2
votes
0answers
113 views

Discrete versus Continuous Hilbert Transform

Let me define the Fourier transform of a function $u$, say in the Schwartz space $\mathscr S(\mathbb R)$ as $ \hat u(\xi)=\int_{\mathbb R} e^{-2iπ x\cdot \xi} u(x) dx. $ The Hilbert transform ...
2
votes
0answers
161 views

Schwartz kernel of a pseudodifferential operator with singular symbols

If we have a smooth symbol $r(x,\xi)$ of order $d$ the corresponding pseudodifferential operator $P$ is integral operator with kernel given by $$K(x,y)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}e^{i(x-y)\cdot \xi} ...
1
vote
0answers
35 views

Regarding a result of I.Vekua on integral equations of first kind

Suppose $k\in L^2([0,1]\times[0,1])$ is a symmetric kernel. Presumably the following is true(under the assumption that $k$ is weakly singular): Either $$\displaystyle\int_0^1f(y)k(x,y)dy=0$$or ...
1
vote
0answers
68 views

Convergence of solutions of the volterra integral equation with convergent kernels

Consider the following Volterra integral equation $$ g(t) = \int_0^t K_n(t,s)w_n(s) ds $$ where g(t) and K_n(t,s) are continuous and $K_n(t,s)\geq K_{n+1}(t,s)$ for all $t,s$. Moreover, $K_n(t,s)$ ...
1
vote
0answers
163 views

A fractional calculus eigenvalue problem

One set of eigenfunction for the following fractional integral operator is $f(z)=e^{-bz}$ for any constant Re$b>0$, with eigenvalue $\lambda=\frac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{b^\alpha}$, $$\int_z^\infty ...
0
votes
0answers
39 views

A source for integral operators in the context of Arthur-Selberg trace formula

Could you suggest a textbook for integral operators (in the context of Arthur-Selberg trace formula)?
0
votes
0answers
23 views

Uniqueness of homogeneous second kind Fredholm equation

I have the following equation: $-\frac{1}{2}\phi + W\phi - V(f\phi) = 0 $ and I intend to prove uniqueness of the solution in a appropriate Sobolev space. V and W denote the direct values of the ...
0
votes
0answers
49 views

volterra equation of the first kind with K(0,t)=0

A standard assumption both in theory and numerical methods for the Volterra equation of the first kind $$ g(t) = \int_0^t K(s,t) f(s) ds$$ is that $K(s,t) \neq 0$. One can show existence of the ...
0
votes
0answers
32 views

Multiple integral of the resolvent kernel

I am trying to implent Volterra equations using resolvent kernel.To do this, the iterative kernel $$K_i(x,y) = \int\limits_x^y K_1(y,t)K_{i-1}(t, x)dt. $$ should be calculated. However, it is not ...
0
votes
0answers
87 views

Existence and Uniqueness of Volterra integral equations of the first kind

$$ \int_0^t k(s,t)f(s)ds=g(t) $$ To prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions of Volterra integral equation(VIE) of the first kind, we usually differentiate it and convert to the VIE of the ...
0
votes
0answers
93 views

can we generalize the cauchy principal value and hadamard's finite part for multiple integrals $ n>1 $

I have seen in wikipedia, that how the Cauchy's pricnipal value and Hadamard's finite part work in dimension one My question is when can we (or if negative answer why can not ) generalize the ...
0
votes
0answers
284 views

Notation for a functional L2 matrix norm

Hi, Let $v(z)$ be a 2x2 matrix depending on a complex variable z, defined on an oriented contour $\Sigma$ in the complex plane. Can anyone tell me the meaning of the notation: ...