5
votes
1answer
105 views

Do non-subcanonical Grothendieck topologies always induce a category of fractions?

Suppose that $\mathscr{C}$ is a (possibly higher) category and $J$ is a Grothendieck topology which is not subcanonical. Denote the composite $$\mathscr{C} \hookrightarrow ...
3
votes
0answers
108 views

When does prolongation preserve sheaves?

Suppose that $(C,J)$ and $(D,K)$ are two Grothendieck (possibly $\infty$-)sites and $f:C \to D$ is a functor such that $$f^*:Psh(D) \to Psh(C)$$ sends sheaves to sheaves. Under what conditions will ...
5
votes
0answers
82 views

Non-degenerate limits of topoi

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be an elementary topos with natural numbers object $\mathbb{N}$, and let $\mathbb{C}$ be a cofiltered internal category in $\mathcal{E}$. Suppose we have a diagram of shape ...
2
votes
0answers
125 views

Cloven Kan fibrations

For each groupoid $G$ there is a monad such that the cloven fibred groupoids over $G$ are algebras for this monad. I am looking for an infinite dimensional counterpart: a monad on simplicial sets ...
7
votes
1answer
208 views

Are topoi and etale geometric morphisms locally small?

This question is related to this one: Local smallness and (higher) topoi which has not yet been answered. The $2$-category of topoi and geometric morphisms is not locally small. (As I mentioned in ...
9
votes
1answer
332 views

Local smallness and (higher) topoi

The $2$-category of topoi and geometric morphisms is not locally small. For example, if $A$ is the classifying topos for abelian groups, the category of geometric morphisms from $Set$ to $A$ is ...
3
votes
0answers
249 views

In the topos-theoretic interpretation of Physics by Isham & Doering what role does intuitionistic logic play? [closed]

I've asked this question on Physics.SE but was advised to ask it here. Isham & Doering have written a series of papers exploring how to ground physics in topoi. Now the internal logic of topoi is ...
16
votes
1answer
2k views

Is Lemma A.1.5.7 in Higher Topos Theory correct?

Hello to everyone, I am studying the properties of combinatorial model categories, following the exposition given by Jacob Lurie in Higher Topos Theory ([HTT] from now on), in section A.2.6. At some ...
5
votes
2answers
308 views

Is the site of (smooth) manifolds hypercomplete?

By site of manifolds Man, I mean the category of manifolds (maybe submanifolds to obtain a small category) with continuous maps between them. A Grothendieck topology is given by open covers. Actually, ...
4
votes
1answer
291 views

What is a higher derived constructible sheaf

Suppose $X$ is a topological space and $k$ some discrete coefficient field. Let's define the category of "$\infty$-local systems on $X$" to be DG representations of the ring $C_*(\Omega X,k)$ of ...
9
votes
1answer
721 views

Are there non-categorical notions in topos theory?

Suppose that $\mathcal{T}$ is an abstract $2$-category we know is equivalent to the $2$-category of Grothendieck topoi via some equivalence $$\phi:\mathcal{T} \to \mathfrak{Top},$$ and let $E$ be an ...
20
votes
4answers
1k views

What is an $(\infty,1)$-topos, and why is this a good setting for doing differential geometry?

In this post on the n-Category Café, Urs Schreiber says that, "The theory of G-principal bundles makes sense in any $(\infty,1)$-topos." I followed the link to the nLab and tried to chase definitions, ...
10
votes
1answer
851 views

How much do universes matter in topos theory?

Suppose we fix two Grothendieck universes $\mathcal{U} \in \mathcal{V}.$ Then one has that $\mathcal{U}$-$\mathbf{Set},$ the category of $\mathcal{U}$-small sets, is a locally $\mathcal{U}$-small, ...
7
votes
0answers
423 views

Where else has Proposition B1.3.17 in the Elephant been proved?

(I asked the same question here and got some helpful comments, but thought I'd re-ask in case I get a more direct response.) This is a sort of reference request. Proposition B1.3.17 in Johnstone's ...
7
votes
2answers
431 views

Canonical topology for infinity topoi revisited.

A while ago I asked this quetion: Canonical topology for big infinity topoi and this question: How to resolve size issues with the regular epimorphism topology Let me first summarize some of what I ...
3
votes
2answers
310 views

Cartesian cubes and groupoids

Given a groupoid $G,$ one can consider the canonical epimorphism $$G_0 \to G.$$ Since it is an epimorphism in the $2$-topos of groupoids, $G$ is the weak colimit of the corresponding Cech diagram ...
9
votes
0answers
502 views

Cohesive ∞-toposes for analytic geometry

There is a class of big ∞-toposes that come with a good supply of intrinsic notions of differential geometry and differential cohomology: called cohesive ∞-toposes (after Lawvere's cohesive toposes). ...
6
votes
0answers
174 views

Canonical topology for big infinity topoi

It is well known that for $E$ a Grothendieck topos, (by appropriately making use of universes) $E$ carries the canonical Grothendieck topology generated by jointly surjective epimorphisms, say $J$, ...
10
votes
3answers
1k views

$\omega$-topos theory?

I've been reading through Lurie's book on higher topos theory, where he develops the theory of $(\infty,1)$-toposes, which leads me to the following question: Is there any sort of higher topos theory ...