1
vote
0answers
83 views

target category of extended field theory

An A-S TFT is a functor from $\text{Bord}_{<nāˆ’1,n>}(\mathcal{F})$ to $\text{Vect}$ where $\mathcal{F}$ denotes a set of background fields, eg a spin structure. An extended theory is a functor ...
8
votes
2answers
355 views

Relation between fully-extended TQFT and a “topless” TQFT

Consider 3-dimensional TQFTs for example. One version of them is the 3-2-1-0 fully extended TQFT. Do we have another version: 2-1-0 extended "TQFT"? If yes, do we have an example of 2-1-0 extended ...
3
votes
0answers
177 views

(āˆž,n)-category of triangulated cobordisms

What is an accepted definition of a (āˆž,n)-category of triangulated cobordisms? Is there one that has a forgetful functor to (Rezk - Hopkins -) Lurie's smooth cobordisms? Does it shed light on how ...
7
votes
0answers
530 views

TQFTs with target category of higher type than the source

In the classical version of the Cobordism Hypothesis, such as, e.g., in Jacob Lurie's On the Classification of Topological Field Theories, one considers the $\infty$-category of symmetric monoidal ...
12
votes
2answers
540 views

Homotopy Fixed Points of SO(2) on Fully Dualizable Algebras

Note: by fixed points, I always mean homotopy fixed points. As explained in Jacob Lurie's paper on the cobordism hypothesis, we have an action of O(2) on the $\infty $-groupoid $X$ given by ...
6
votes
0answers
428 views

Principal $G$-bundles as fully extended TQFTs, and $n$-representations

This is a follow up to this MO question: Fully dualizable objects in classical field theories Assuming the notation there (which in turn come from Topological Quantum Field Theories from Compact Lie ...
10
votes
2answers
449 views

What do decategorification and “compactification on a circle” have to do with each other?

Some physicists have told me that if you think about an extended n-dimensional TQFT $F$, then the decategorification is given by $F'(X)=F(X\times S^1)$, which I believe they call "compactification on ...