The higher-algebra tag has no wiki summary.

**6**

votes

**1**answer

163 views

### Infinite dimensional 2-Hilbert spaces

Is there a definition of an infinite dimensional 2-Hilbert space?
Finite dimensional 2-Hilbert spaces have been discussed by Baez in
http://arxiv.org/abs/q-alg/9609018
In the more recent paper by ...

**6**

votes

**0**answers

209 views

### Topological quotient Hopf-algebras and “change-of-rings”

One way of constructing coalgebra objects in the homotopy theorist's category of spectra is to take the suspension spectrum of a space, with the diagonal providing a cocommutative comultiplication. ...

**5**

votes

**0**answers

106 views

### Reference for a generalization of Γ-spaces to monoidal model categories

Γ-spaces were introduced by Segal in 1969 as models for what can be now described
as commutative ∞-monoids and ∞-groups in cartesian symmetric monoidal ∞-categories, e.g., E_∞-spaces and connective ...

**4**

votes

**0**answers

126 views

### Derived Functors, Projection Formula and Base Change in the Derived $\infty$-Category

Let $X$ be a smooth stack and $\mathcal O_X$ the ring of smooth functions on $X$, i.e. for any smooth $M \to X$, $\mathcal O_X(M \to X) = C^\infty(M)$.
In HigherAlgebra, the derived category ...

**4**

votes

**0**answers

111 views

### understanding the definition of $\infty$-operad of module objects

I'm just trying to understand the following definition:
Definition 3.3.3.8 in Higher Algebra by J. Lurie defines the $\infty$-operad of $O$-module objects, and says the following:
Let $O^\otimes$ be ...

**2**

votes

**0**answers

35 views

### Connection on 3-bundle given as triplet of forms

A connection on a bundle is given locally by a Lie algebra-valued 1-form.
Gauge transformations act in the usual way on the forms, and form a groupoid.
A connection on a 2-bundle is given locally by ...

**1**

vote

**0**answers

93 views

### Exact sequence of L-infinity-algebras

We call a sequence of $L_\infty$-algebras (weak) maps
$$0\to L\xrightarrow{f} M\xrightarrow{g} N\to 0$$
is exact if it is exact on the the underlying chain complexes level.
Thought I don't know ...