5
votes
2answers
216 views

Universal graphs on higher cardinals

The Rado graph contains every finite graph as induced subgraph, and its also holds for countable graphs. So it is an universal graph of size $\aleph_0$, which contains all graphs of size $\aleph_0$ as ...
7
votes
0answers
184 views

Is there a Rado category?

The Rado graph appears to have a nice universality property (it contains all finite and all countably infinite graphs as induced subgraphs) and homogeinety property (any isomorphism between ...
1
vote
1answer
250 views

Self-containing graphs

[Second try, after this question failed.] Let me sketch a notion of self-containing structures by a simple example. Consider the class $\Gamma$ of finite or countable digraphs ("graphs" for short) ...
1
vote
0answers
147 views

Self-modelling structures

Consider - for the sake of simplicity - only graphs as structures. For undirected graphs $(V, E\subseteq \binom{V}{2})$ let $E(v)$ be the set of edges $e\in E$ incident with $v$, i.e. $\lbrace e ...
2
votes
1answer
196 views

Definability in a language with a single binary predicate

Let the first-order language ${\mathcal{L}}$ have a single binary predicate $P$. Consider the structure whose underlying set is ${\mathbb{Z}}$, the integers, and an ordered pair $(m,n)$ is in $P$ if ...
3
votes
1answer
398 views

Examples of Graphs with Trivial Definable Closure

If I'm giving a lecture on trivial definable closure (as a property of graphs), what is a good example of a graph that I can easily draw to depict the concept of trivial dcl?
2
votes
1answer
392 views

Ergodic Invariant Measures and the Rado graph

Given two or more invariant measures on a structure, there are various ways to combine them to form another invariant measure on the structure. For example, given two invariant measures on a ...
6
votes
4answers
651 views

Self-defining structures

The relations $R$ in abstract graphs (with genuinely propertyless vertices) cannot be defined because there is nothing the relations can base on: they have to be presupposed. But consider derived ...
2
votes
0answers
163 views

Semantics of neural network-like structures

Background Language (of mathematicians and most other people) has a sequential surface structure and a tree-like deep structure. So semantics usually is the semantics of such syntactical structures: ...
7
votes
3answers
469 views

Statistics for Second order properties of Random graphs

Hi! Let G(N) be the number of graphs with vertices {1, 2, ..., N} and GN(F) be the number of those of them which satisfy graph property F. There is a beautiful result by Glebskii and Fagin that limit ...
14
votes
1answer
566 views

Which graphs are elementarily equivalent to their own disjoint sums?

In Stefan Geschke's recent question, one of the solutions observed that the graph consisting of a single infinite beaded chain, a $\mathbb{Z}$-chain where each integer is connected to its nearest ...
10
votes
3answers
1k views

Is non-connectedness of graphs first order axiomatizable?

A recent question asked for graph properties that are first order axiomatizable but not finitely axiomatizable. Connectedness was mentioned in the context. Connectedness can be axiomatized in ...
5
votes
0answers
414 views

Natural models of graphs?

Motivation I want to capture the notion of natural models of finite graphs: How can natural predicates and natural relations on a given natural base class $D$ be defined? If this succeeds the ...