3
votes
3answers
181 views
L-systems and Sierpinski Triangle
I was just shocked when I saw these consecutive outcomes of an L-system converging to the Sierpinski triangle (shown in the picture below).
I'm interested to know how could one a …
0
votes
1answer
128 views
Any grammar for the language $L =a^p$, $p$ is prime number of $\mathbb{N}$
Any grammar for the language
$$L =a^p,\text{ $p$ is prime and }p\in \mathbb{N}?$$
Is such a grammar related to any question of number theory like RH or the conjecture of twin prim …
5
votes
1answer
257 views
How to work out a grammar if we know the language?
How to work out a grammar if we know the language? Or at least How to work out a grammar if we know the language that is restricted to a special kind like CFL or CSL? For example,w …
7
votes
5answers
324 views
Generating function of a regular language
It is well known that the generating function of a regular language $L$, i.e. $\sum n_kz^k$ where $n_k$ is the number of words of length $k$ in $L$, is rational, i.e. a quotient of …
2
votes
0answers
39 views
Is any CFL intersection,union of CFLs that are not inherently ambiguous?
Is any CFL intersection,union of CFLs that are not inherently ambiguous?
3
votes
0answers
60 views
Properties of classical automata preserved in Büchi automata
Given two NFW $A$ and $B$, we regarded $A$ and $B$ as Büchi automata.
We can show that the containment property is not preserved in Büchi automata. That is, we can construct a exa …
0
votes
1answer
221 views
prove (a+b)*=a*(ba*)* [closed]
formal language and automata theory
regular expessions
(a+b)* =a*(ba*)*
please answer
I want the proof
thank you
1
vote
3answers
212 views
Satisfiability problem for FOL[<,R]
Let FOL[<,R] be the fragment of first-order logic enriched with two relational symbols < and R and the first-order axioms that say:
< is a strict partial order and R is a …
11
votes
2answers
631 views
What’s the difference between ZFC+Grothendieck, ZFC+inaccessible cardinals and Tarski-Grothendieck set theory?
Say that "U" is the axiom that "For each set x, there exists a Grothendieck universe U such that x $\in$ U", where Grothendieck universes are defined in the usual way (or, if that' …
3
votes
1answer
257 views
Deciding equivalence of regular languages
Given two regular expressions $R$ and $S$ on an alphabet $\Sigma$ it is possible to decide their equivalence as follows:
build two finite automata $M_R$ and $M_S$ such that $L(R) …
27
votes
6answers
1k views
Has anyone thought about creating a formal proof wiki with verifier?
Mathematics has undergone some rather nice developments recently with the adoption of new techologies, things like on-line journals, the arXiv, this website, etc. I imagine there …
3
votes
2answers
699 views
Certain type of regular languages
Dear All,
there is one type of regular languages, over ${a,b}$, which appear naturally in what I am studying, so if anybody could recognise them, or say any sort of their characte …
2
votes
2answers
576 views
All properties of a mathematical object
This is primarily a question about related literature. I am looking for specific references, or terminology that I can use to search for references.
Let A a well defined mathemati …
0
votes
1answer
89 views
Can decidability results for monadic second-order logic be extended to monadic higher-order logics?
Call a higher-order logic fully monadic if and only if all of its predicate constants (at any order) and higher-order variables (at any order) are monadic (and it has no function s …
1
vote
1answer
120 views
Is complement of LL(k) grammar context free?
Is complement of LL(k) grammar context free?

