Forcing is a method first used to prove the continuum hypothesis is independent of the classical axioms of set theory

learn more… | top users | synonyms

24
votes
4answers
995 views

Forcing as a replacement of induction and diagonal arguments

Let me give some examples motivating the question. The use of forcing instead of induction: For this consider Cantor's theorem: Theorem 1. Any two countable dense linear orders $I, J$ without end ...
5
votes
2answers
524 views

A specific Model of ZFC

In his paper "Some Second Order Set Theory", Joel Hamkins asked whether there is a model of set theory $V$ that is elementary equivalent to $V[G]$, Whenever $G$ is $V$-generic for the collapse of a ...
1
vote
0answers
163 views

The patterns of possibility for nontrivial automorphisms and nontrivial elementary embeddings of the universe

In their paper "The Role of the Foundation Axiom in the Kunen Inconsistency" (arXiv:1311.0814 [Math.LO]), Daghighi, Golshani, Hamkins, and Jerabek show that the patterns of possibility for the ...
4
votes
0answers
205 views

Is there some absoluteness between the Boolean valued universe $V^{B}$ and $V$?

It is well known that if $\phi$ is a $\Delta_{1}$-formula and $x_{1},..,x_{n}$ in $V$ and $V[G]$ is a forcing extension, then $V\models\phi(x_{1},...,x_{n})$ if and only if ...
13
votes
6answers
1k views

The origins of forcing in mathematical logic and other branches of mathematics

As everyone knows, forcing was created by Cohen to answer questions in set theory. Question 1. What are the first applications of set theoretic forcing in other branches of mathematical logic, like ...
3
votes
0answers
164 views

What algebraic identities does the iteration of forcing operation satisfy?

Let $G$ be the set of all formulas $\phi(x)$ in the language of such that $ZFC\vdash\exists x\phi(x)$ exists, $ZFC\vdash\phi(x)\rightarrow``x\,\textrm{is a complete Boolean algebra}"$, ...
4
votes
1answer
124 views

$\mathfrak{p}=\mathfrak{b}=\mathfrak{a}=\aleph_1$ and $\mathfrak{d}=\mathfrak{c}=\kappa$

Asumme tha in $M$, $CH$ holds and $\kappa>\aleph_0$ and $\kappa^{\aleph_0}=\kappa$. Let $K$ be $Fn(\kappa,2)$-generic over $M$. Question: Then we can say in $M[K]$ that: $(i)$ ...
14
votes
2answers
510 views

Scott-Solovay unpublished paper on ``Boolean valued models of set theory''

I have read some papers from 1970$^{th}$, and in some of them, the paper of Scott and Solovay on ``Boolean valued models of set theory'' is given as a main reference, with many references to the ...
2
votes
1answer
107 views

“Namba forcing adds reals” independent of $ZFC + \neg CH$?

I know that, in the presence of $CH$, Namba forcing does not add reals. But when $CH$ fails, is it consistent that it still does not add reals?
8
votes
2answers
226 views

Is there a version of Miller forcing “guided by” an ultrafilter?

It’s well known that Mathias forcing factors as a two-step iteration $P(\omega)/\mathrm{fin}\ast \mathbb{M}_{\dot U}$, where $\mathbb{M}_{\dot U}$ is Mathias forcing guided by the generic ultrafilter ...
7
votes
6answers
501 views

Applications of forcing in model theory

What are the major applications of (set theoretic) forcing in model theory?
7
votes
1answer
341 views

Tree Version of Hechler Forcing

In their recent (2009) paper Eventually Different Functions and Inaccessible Cardinals, Brendle and Löwe consider a 'tree version' of the Hechler forcing. This forcing $\mathbb{D}$ consists of ...
5
votes
2answers
235 views

Preservation Results for Iterations of Non-Proper Forcing

Suppose $\mathbb{P}$ is a forcing with the following properties: Let $G \subseteq \mathbb{P}$ be filter generic over $V$, then there exists $A \in V[G]$ such that $V[G]$ thinks $A$ is countable and $A ...
14
votes
2answers
465 views

Preservation of properness

Suppose $\mathbb P$ is a countably closed forcing, and $\mathbb Q$ is a c.c.c. forcing that adds reals. Is $\mathbb P$ still proper in $V^{\mathbb Q}$?
8
votes
0answers
161 views

History of preservation theorems in forcing theory

For my honours thesis, I am studying a general preservation theorem using a framework provided by Shelah. I am mainly concerned about revised countable support iteration of $\dot{S}$-semiproper ...
6
votes
1answer
436 views

Adding sets not containing arithmetic progressions of length three by forcing

Consider the following forcing notion: conditions in $\mathbb{P}$ are pairs $(s, N),$ where: 1) $s\in 2^{<\omega}$, 2) $N\in \mathbb{N}$, 3) (by identifying $s$ with a subset of $lh(s)$) $s$ ...
6
votes
0answers
185 views

Tree property and singular strong limit cardinals

I heard that the following theorem is proved recently by Foreman-Magidor, which answers a famous old open question: Theorem. It is consistent, relative to the existence of large cardinals, that ...
15
votes
3answers
821 views

Questions about $\aleph_1-$closed forcing notions

"Foreman`s maximality principle" states that every non-trivial forcing notion either adds a real or collapses some cardinals. This principle has many consequences including: 1) $GCH$ fails ...
-2
votes
1answer
180 views

Forcing and $\mathbb{P}$-name [closed]

If $\mathbb{P}$ be a poset, $\dot{Q}$ a $\mathbb{P}$-name and $\mu$ an infinite cardinal such that $\Vdash 0<|\dot{Q}|\leq\mu$. $(a)$ Exist names $\langle \dot{q}_\alpha\rangle_{\alpha<\mu}$ ...
13
votes
3answers
530 views

Products of Cohen forcings

Let $\lambda$ be an infinite cardinal. Does the full support product of $\lambda$ copies of $Add(\omega, 1)$ collapse $2^\lambda$ to $\aleph_0$? For $\lambda = \omega$, it is known to be true (it is ...
1
vote
1answer
235 views

Confusion with proof about a fact $\mathbb{P}$-name [closed]

Let $\mathbb{P}$ be poset. Let $B$ be a set. We say that a $\mathbb{P}$-name $\dot{b}$ is a nice name for member of $B$ if there is a maximal antichain $A\subseteq\mathbb{P}$ and a function ...
14
votes
3answers
540 views

Singularizing forcing of “small” cardinality?

Can there be a large cardinal $\kappa$ and a forcing of size $\kappa$ that makes $\kappa$ a singular cardinal? The motivation is that the standard Prikry forcing does not have a dense set of size ...
4
votes
1answer
263 views

stationary tower forcing

It is known that if $\delta$ is a Woodin cardinal and $\kappa < \delta$, then the stationary tower forcing $\mathbb Q^\kappa_{<\delta}$ preserves cardinals up to $\kappa$ and forces $\delta = ...
11
votes
1answer
298 views

cardinals below the critical point of a generic embedding

This may be an easy question. Are the cardinals below the critical point of a precipitous ideal embedding always absolute between the generic ultrapower and the generic extension? To focus on the ...
7
votes
2answers
421 views

collapsing successor of singular

Let $\lambda$ be a singular cardinal. Is it consistent that there is a forcing of size $\lambda^+$ that collapses $\lambda^+$ while preserving all cardinals below $\lambda$? (Note that even without ...
4
votes
1answer
134 views

presaturated ideals

In this paper, Gitik and Shelah make the following claim (part of Proposition 1.5): Claim (Gitik-Shelah): Suppose $\kappa < \lambda$ are regular, $2^\lambda = \lambda^+$, and $D$ is a normal ...
4
votes
2answers
212 views

Proving results about complete Boolean algebras in ZFC using Boolean valued models

I want to know what non-trivial ZFC theorems (not consistency results) about complete Boolean algebras (or more generally of partially ordered sets) one can prove using forcing. I am mainly ...
3
votes
1answer
88 views

The GCH in a reverse Easton support iteration

I am trying to understand the proof that the GCH can first fail at a weakly compact cardinal. We assume the GCH and that there exists a weakly compact cardinal $\kappa$, and we construct a reverse ...
5
votes
1answer
146 views

Pseudo-Prikry sequences vs Prikry sequences

Definition: Let $V\subseteq W$ be two transitive models of $ZFC$. A pseudo-Prikry sequence, $s$, at a cardinal $\kappa$ for $(V, W)$ is an $\omega$-sequence, cofinal at $\kappa$ such that for every ...
9
votes
0answers
214 views

Proving regularity properties from forcing axioms

It's well known that PFA implies projective determinacy. It's also well known that PD implies that all projective sets are Lebesgue measurable, have the Baire property, etc. Is there a direct proof ...
9
votes
1answer
338 views

Forcing to “minimally” add new reals.

Suppose that I want to force to add a "single" new subset of $\omega$ and not much else. For example, consider the Cohen forcing consisting of finite partial functions from $\omega$ to 2. The forcing ...
9
votes
1answer
314 views

singularize the least inaccessible?

Is it consistent that there is some partial order $\mathbb P$ and some inaccessible cardinal $\kappa$, which is the least inaccessible, such that $\mathbb P$ forces $\kappa$ to be singular while ...
8
votes
1answer
389 views

Adding a real with infinite conditions

Consider the forcing $\Bbb P$ whose conditions are partial functions $p\colon\omega\to2$ with $\operatorname{dom}(p)$ a co-infinite subset of $\omega$, ordered by reverse inclusion. Does $\Bbb P$ ...
7
votes
1answer
197 views

Generic filters of inverse limits

Maybe this doubt is silly, but I do not understand the final step of the proof of Lemma 5.2 in Hamkins' paper Fragile measurability, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1994) 262-282. There, $\mathbb ...
13
votes
2answers
697 views

Set-theoretic forcing over sites?

All texts I have read on set-theoretic independence proofs consider several different sorts of constructions separately, such as Boolean-valued models (equivalently, forcing over posets), permutation ...
3
votes
0answers
118 views

a game with generic filters

The present question is a follow-up to this one. Assume GCH holds in $V$ and suppose $G \subseteq Add(\omega_1,\omega_2)$ is generic over $V$. For any $g \subseteq Add(\omega_1,\alpha)$ in $V[G]$ ...
6
votes
0answers
172 views

Core model for supercompact cardinals and iteration trees

I have a few somehow related questions: Question 1. What do we expect for an inner model $\mathcal{K}$ to be a core model for a supercompact cardinal? What properties should it have, and what ...
11
votes
1answer
218 views

counterexample regarding quotient algebras in forcing

Suppose $A$ and $B$ are complete subalgebras of a complete boolean algebra $C$. Let $G \subseteq A$ be generic. In the extension $V[G]$, we can define the quotient algebras $B/G$ and $C/G$ in the ...
3
votes
1answer
267 views

Some questions on (non)-measurable sets without AC

In his answer to a Math Stack Exchange question of Katlus, Asaf Karagila wrote the following: "It is a theorem that from $ZF+DC+$"$\aleph_1$$\le$$|$$\mathbb R$$|$" we can prove that there is an ...
6
votes
0answers
232 views

A new cardinality living in every forcing extension?

This question is motivated by the papers http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7456 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1224. Say that a set $X$ is "generically presentable" over $V\models ZF$ if there is some ...
1
vote
1answer
157 views

A question regarding sets of Vitali's type in models of $ZF+GCH$ where $L$$\neq$$V$

Consider sets of Vitali's type in models of $ZF+GCH$ where $L$ $\neq$$V$. Are there sets of Vitali's type in both $L$ and $V-L$? If so, is there any way one can distinguish the constructible sets of ...
2
votes
3answers
810 views

Where do Set Theory and Number Theory meet together?

As all know, by absoluteness theorems in Set Theory, most of theorems in number theory are $ZFC$-provable if and only if they are consistent with $ZFC$, it's because of absoluteness of essence of ...
9
votes
0answers
155 views

Preserving Jonsson cardinals

I am (still) interested in trying to characterize and describe forcings that preserve Jonsson cardinals. A cardinal $\kappa$ is a Jonsson cardinal if there is no Jonsson algebra on $\kappa$, i.e. ...
10
votes
1answer
536 views

Is forcing computable?

By results similar to Tennenbaum's theorem we know that there exist no computable models of $ZF$. But suppose we are given, as a sort of oracle, access to some model of $ZF$ (e.g. we can make oracle ...
30
votes
1answer
756 views

Producing finite objects by forcing!

It is a trivial fact that forcing can not produce finite sets of ground model objects. However there are situations, where we can use forcing to prove the existence of finite objects with some ...
5
votes
2answers
380 views

Gorelic's Forcing for large Lindelöf spaces with points $G_\delta$

I am trying to understand a step for proving that there exists large Hausdorff Lindelöf Spaces with points $G_\delta$ using forcing. I am following Isaac Gorelic's "The Baire Category And Forcing ...
10
votes
2answers
307 views

Semiproper but not proper

Assume V=L. Is there a semi-proper notion of forcing that is not proper? Namba forcing isn't semi-proper in L, and Prikry forcing isn't even available there.
3
votes
1answer
132 views

CCC Forcing and $\omega_1$ conditions

I have a question about the proof of the Lemma 7.2 in the paper I. Juhász, P. Koszmider and L. Soukup, A first countable, initially $\omega_{1}$-compact but non-compact space, Topology and its ...
2
votes
1answer
134 views

A question regarding forcing extensions

Can one, for an infinite set A in ZFC, use forcing to add so many generic subsets of A as to make the collection of all subsets of A a proper class? Consider now a model $M$ of ZFC and use $Add( , ...
1
vote
2answers
131 views

A Question Regarding Defining Generic Extensions of ZF and ZFC in Morse-Kelly Set Theory

It is known that Morse-Kelly (MK) set theory forms a metatheory for ZFC. For example: MK proves Con(ZFC). In fact, Joel David Hamkins claims in his blog post "Kelly-Morse set theory implies Con(ZFC) ...