0
votes
0answers
17 views

Some Galois theory [migrated]

I have a question on field extensions, and I can't seem to find precise answers when browsing through online notes etc. Here it is: suppose $K$ and $k$ are fields with $k \leq K$ and $[K : k] = m$ ...
1
vote
0answers
100 views

Discriminant of a compositum of number fields, a bound?

Given two number fields $E$ and $F$, is there a bound on $|d_{EF}|$, the absolute value of the absolute discriminant of the compositum of fields $EF$, in terms of $d_E$, $d_F$, and the extension ...
6
votes
1answer
424 views

Parity of class number of pure cubic fields

A pure cubic field is an algebraic number field of the form $K = \mathbb{Q}(\theta)$ with $\theta^3 = m$, $m \neq \pm 1$. What can be said about the parity (odd or even) of the class number of a pure ...
7
votes
2answers
471 views

An alternative description of K^*/Nm(L^*)

Is there a nice explicit description for the group $K^*/Nm_{L/K}(L^*)$ for a finite field extension $L/K$? What if for example, $L$ is obtained from $K$ by ajoining an n-th root of some $\alpha \in ...
3
votes
1answer
684 views

How do I visualize finite covers of curves over non-algebraically closed fields?

If $L$ is algebraically closed, fields of transcendence degree one over $L$ correspond to algebraic curves over $L$ up to birational equivalence, and finite extensions correspond to finite Galois ...
18
votes
1answer
865 views

What is the ring of integers of the Pythagorean field?

Following Hilbert, we call the complex numbers constructible via compass and straight-edge the field of Euclidean numbers, and the totally real such numbers the field of Pythagorean numbers. (Among ...
3
votes
0answers
131 views

Analogue of a ring extension splitting in the Kummer case

Background (the Kummer extension case) Let $R$ be a complete regular local ring (it follws that it's a UFD) with a prime integer $p$ contained in the maximal ideal of $R$ (I'm mostly interested ...
2
votes
1answer
394 views

Sum of n-th roots is rarely rational

Let $m,n$ be positive integers, and $\displaystyle \Phi_{m,n}~:~ {\mathbb{R}_+^*}^m \to \mathbb{R}_+^*, \ \ \ (x_1,x_2, \ldots , x_m) \mapsto \sum_{k=1}^m \sqrt[n]{x_k}$. Clearly for $m=1$ if for all ...