The determinacy tag has no wiki summary.

**9**

votes

**1**answer

274 views

### Assuming AD, is every infinite cardinal closed under power set in a choice model?

Assume AD+DC. Assume $\kappa$ is an infinite cardinal and $N$ is a (set or class) transitive model of ZFC containing $\kappa$.
Is it true that for all $\alpha<\kappa$, $N$ thinks that the power ...

**7**

votes

**0**answers

178 views

### Countable choice in $L(\mathbb{R}^*_G)$

Let $\lambda$ be a singular strong limit cardinal and let $G \subset \text{Col}(\omega,\mathord{<}\lambda)$ be a $V$-generic filter. Let $\mathbb{R}^*_G = \bigcup_{\alpha < \lambda} ...

**9**

votes

**0**answers

172 views

### Which forcing types preserve the axiom of determinacy?

Do we have some rudimentary understanding of some properties that a forcing can have in order to guarantee that it doesn't violate the axiom of determinacy?
To be more specific, in Which forcings ...

**4**

votes

**1**answer

264 views

### What axioms (other than choice) have a taming effect on the ordering of cardinalities?

Axiom of choice arranges all cardinalities into a well-ordered chain but without it their ordering can be wild in general ZF models, e.g. two cardinalities may not even have inf or sup. However, ...

**5**

votes

**1**answer

260 views

### $\omega$ universally Baire sets, tree representations

I've recently encountered the notion of a universally Baire set, and I've tried to look at the paper by Feng, Magidor and Woodin where this notion is studied. There are several points that confuse me.
...

**9**

votes

**1**answer

171 views

### n odd: $\bf\Delta^1_n$ wadge degrees are $< \bf\delta^1_{n+1}$

My adviser is out of town and there is a comment in the Van Wesep paper "wadge degrees and descriptive set theory" that I can't figure out.
Work in ZF+AD throughout.
As stated in the title, the ...

**9**

votes

**1**answer

222 views

### $\Sigma^0_1\wedge\Pi^0_1$-Determinacy holds in the second admissible above the game

Let $T$ be a game tree and $T\in N\in M$, where $N,M$ are the two least admissibles containing $T$. Let $A$ be a boolean combination of two lightface open sets in $[T]$, or alternatively, a boolean ...

**9**

votes

**1**answer

279 views

### Universal $(\Sigma^2_1)^{\text{Hom}_{\mathord{<}\lambda}}$ set

Does anyone know of a reference for the fact that if $\lambda$ is a limit of Woodin cardinals, then the pointclass $(\Sigma^2_1)^{\text{Hom}_{\mathord{<}\lambda}}$ is $\omega$-parameterized? By ...

**7**

votes

**1**answer

265 views

### Determinacy from $\omega_1\rightarrow(\omega_1)^{\omega_1}$

Assuming the Axiom of Determinacy (abbreviated AD), Martin showed how to derive a rather strong partition on $\omega_1$, namely that $\omega_1\rightarrow(\omega_1)^{\omega_1}$. In "Infinitary ...

**10**

votes

**1**answer

296 views

### Consistency strength of projective determinacy (PD)

Let PD stand for projective determinacy, and consider the two claims:
(1) For each n=1,2,..., Con(ZFC+PD) implies Con(ZFC + there are n Woodin cardinals)
(2) Con(ZFC+PD) implies Con(ZFC + there are ...

**8**

votes

**1**answer

396 views

### Coding a model of $0^\sharp$ from a $\Pi^1_1$ Gale-Stewart game

As a preface to this question, this is my first time asking on Math overflow, and this seemed like the sort of question that would be acceptable here. However, I apologize if it is not.
A method for ...

**17**

votes

**3**answers

1k views

### Counterintuitive consequences of the Axiom of Determinacy?

I just read Dr Strangechoice's explanation that if all subsets of the real numbers are Lebesgue measurable, then you can partition $2^\omega$ into more than $2^\omega$ many pairwise disjoint nonempty ...

**11**

votes

**1**answer

259 views

### Which forcings preserve (some) determinacy?

The question is exactly as in the title. I'm interested in general in all questions of the form "which forcings preserve property P?" for any P, but determinacy assumptions occupy a special place in ...

**3**

votes

**1**answer

221 views

### sigma-algebra generated by OD sets

Assume $V=L(\mathbb{R})$ and the Axiom of Determinacy. Is every set of reals generated by ordinal-definable sets of reals under the operations of countable union and intersection?
The class of sets ...

**6**

votes

**2**answers

317 views

### Weakly homogeneous trees under AD

If AD$_\mathbb{R}$ holds and $\kappa < \Theta$ then every tree $T$ on $\kappa$ is weakly homogeneous (Martin–Woodin, "Weakly homogeneous trees.") I recall hearing that the hypothesis can be ...

**13**

votes

**0**answers

385 views

### How to prove projective determinacy (PD) from I0?

Martin and Steel (in 1987?) showed that if there are infinite many Woodin cardinals then every projective set of reals is determined (PD).
However, it is mentioned in many texts that in 1983/1984 ...

**10**

votes

**1**answer

378 views

### Consistency strengths related to the perfect set property

I want a model of $\mathrm{MA}_{\sigma\mathrm{-centered}}+\neg\mathrm{CH}$ in which every set of reals in $L(\mathbb{R})$ has the perfect set property. In terms of consistency strength, it is known ...

**6**

votes

**2**answers

694 views

### How additive is Lebesgue measure in ZF+AD ?

What is known about the additivity of Lebesgue measure under the Axiom of Determinacy?
That is, for what cardinals $\kappa$ do we have
with $|I| = \kappa$, for all functions $f : I \to ...

**5**

votes

**1**answer

301 views

### value of Theta in ZF+AD

Since I found out about it, I've always been interested in the Axiom of Determinacy rather than the Axiom of Choice. Along these lines, I've kept flipping back to ...

**9**

votes

**2**answers

753 views

### Martin's cone theorem and recursion theory

Martin's remarkable cone theorem in the theory of determinacy says the following:
Suppose $A\subseteq \omega^\omega$ is Turing invariant and determined. If $\forall x\exists y(x\le_T y\& y\in ...

**0**

votes

**1**answer

186 views

**3**

votes

**1**answer

239 views

### Related Open Game in Analytic Determinacy

For this question, please refer to Chapter 33 page 638, Set Theory Millennium Edition, by Thomas Jech.
The proof of analytic games $G_A$ is converted into an open game $G^\ast$ on some suitable ...