10
votes
4answers
877 views
Proof strength of Calculus of (Inductive) Constructions
This is a follow-on from this question, where I pondered the consistency strength of Coq. This was too broad a question, so here is one more focussed. Rather, two more focussed que …
1
vote
1answer
340 views
How to interpret conflicting formal proofs about “a mod 0 = ? ”
The proof assistants Coq and Isabelle give conflicting formal proofs about $a \mod 0 \qquad \forall a \in \mathbb{Z}$.
According to Coq
$$ a \mod 0 = 0$$
and Isabelle proves
$$ a …
1
vote
0answers
608 views
Why should I trust Coq when assumption-free proof of False in Coq exists? [closed]
Damien Pous announced code for assumption-free proof of False in Coq which means inconsistency in Coq (without using exploits, lol).
Damien is critical of "fully certified decisio …

