The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

1
vote
1answer
342 views

Counterexemple to Urysohn's lemma in a topos without denombrable choice ?

Hello ! The Urysohn's Lemma assert that in every topological spaces which is normal two closed subset may be separated by a real valued function. It's proof use axiom of countable choice (but not the ...
19
votes
0answers
660 views

Supercompact and Reinhardt cardinals without choice

A friend of mine and I ran into the following question while reading about proper forcing, and have been unable to resolve it: Definition. A cardinal $\kappa$ is supercompact if for all ordinals ...
10
votes
1answer
403 views

Is choice needed to establish the existence of idempotent ultrafilters?

It is well known that the Stone–Čech compactification $\beta \mathbb N^+$ of the positive natural numbers has the structure of a compact left semitopological semigroup and hence, by Ellis's lemma, has ...
26
votes
0answers
809 views

Concerning the various proofs from the axiom of choice that R^3 admits of surprising geometrical decompositions into circles, skew lines and so on: can we prove in any instance that there are no Borel such decompositions? Or that AC is required?

This question follows up on a comment I made on Joseph O'Rourke's recent question, one of several questions here on mathoverflow concerning surprising geometric partitions of space using the axiom of ...
12
votes
1answer
606 views

Sizes of bases of vector spaces without the axiom of choice

Assuming the axiom of choice does not hold we have that there is a vector space without a basis. The situation can be, in some sense, worse. It is consistent that there are vector spaces that have two ...
4
votes
1answer
887 views

Countably generated $\sigma$-algebras of ${\mathcal P}({\mathbb R})$ and choice

It is consistent with ${\sf ZF}$ that the reals are the countable union of countable sets. Since any countable set is Borel, it follows that in any such pathological universe, let's call it $W$, every ...
3
votes
0answers
227 views

On Successive Regular Cardinals With No Ladders

Definition: Let $\kappa$ be an $\aleph$ cardinal, we say that $\langle f_\alpha\colon\alpha\to\kappa\mid\alpha<\kappa^+\rangle$ is a ladder if every $f_\alpha$ is injective. Equivalently this is ...
10
votes
3answers
916 views

What sort of large cardinal can $\aleph_1$ be without the axiom of choice?

Assuming the axiom of choice it is very easy to see that $\aleph_1$ is a regular Joe of a successor cardinal. It is not very large in any way except the fact that it is the first uncountable cardinal. ...
1
vote
2answers
454 views

Axiom of choice and convergence

Hi fellows, I was wondering. Is the axiom of choice used to show that $\mathbb{R}$ is complete? If yes, is there a way to construct monotonic bounded sequences that do not converge? Thanks in ...
2
votes
2answers
334 views

What sort of structure can amorphous sets support?

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every cardinal is either finite (i.e., an element of $\omega$) or Dedekind-infinite (i.e., in bijection with a proper subset of itself). This dichotomy is not true in ZF, ...
17
votes
1answer
894 views

The Continuum Hypothesis and Countable Unions

I recently edited an answer of mine on math.SE which discussed the implication of the two assertions: $AH(0)$ which is $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_1$, and $CH$ which says that if $A\subseteq 2^{\omega}$ ...
6
votes
3answers
505 views

Surjective Maps onto $\aleph$-numbers

We denote by $\frak p\le q$ the abbreviation that there is $f:\frak p\to q$ which is injective, and by $\frak p\le^\ast q$ we abbreviate that there is a surjection from $\frak q$ onto $\frak p$. If ...
6
votes
0answers
258 views

What are these sets in Freyd's model?

Recall Freyd's model of $ZF +\neg AC$ (as recounted in MacLane and Moerdijk's book Sheaves in Geometry and Logic): it arises as the Fourman interpretation of the topos of sheaves on a particular ...
14
votes
0answers
507 views

Antichains of Cardinals in ZF Without Choice…

With the Axiom of Choice, the cardinals form a nice linearly ordered "set". In the absence of the Axiom of Choice, the cardinals form a partially ordered "set". Broadly, I am wondering what ...
3
votes
0answers
321 views

New Foundations and weaker forms of choice

New Foundations (introduced by Quine) proves that $AC$ is false. Out of curiosity, is $NF$ consistent with countable choice or dependent choice? What's the strongest consequence of choice still ...
29
votes
1answer
2k views

Does $2^X=2^Y\Rightarrow |X|=|Y|$ imply the axiom of choice?

The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis can be stated as $2^{\aleph_\alpha}=\aleph_{\alpha+1}$. We know that GCH implies AC (Jech, The Axiom of Choice, Theorem 9.1 p.133). In fact, a relatively weak ...
16
votes
6answers
1k views

Unique Existence and the Axiom of Choice

The axiom of choice states that arbitrary products of nonempty sets are nonempty. Clearly, we only need the axiom of choice to show the non-emptiness of the product if there are infinitely many ...
12
votes
2answers
710 views

Two questions about vector spaces absent AC.

My questions are motivated by this question which asks, in the absence of AC, whether a subspace of a vector space with a basis must have a basis. Does every real vector space embed isomorphically ...
22
votes
1answer
1k views

If $V$ is a vector space with a basis. $W\subseteq V$ has to have a basis too?

Suppose $V$ is a vector space, we say that $\mathcal B$ is a basis for $V$ if: Every $v\in V$ can be written as a linear combination of elements of $\mathcal B$; If $\sum\alpha_i b_i = 0$, where ...
8
votes
0answers
718 views

Does every group of order bigger than 2 have a non-trivial automorphism?

If $G$ is a non-abelian group, then it has a non-trivial inner automorphism (conjugation by any non-central element). If $G$ is abelian of exponent bigger than 2, then the inversion map is an ...
5
votes
2answers
480 views

Example of a topos that violates countable choice

At this nLab page we have the line In contrast, any topos that violates countable choice, of which there are plenty, must also violate internal COSHEP. It doesn't give an example, and neither ...
5
votes
2answers
465 views

Forcing the nonexistence of a certain set

I have a certain set-theoretic axiom (WISC) which follows from Choice (this is a nuking a fly BTW), but which I suspect is independent of ZF. To show this I need to show that a certain set does not ...
10
votes
1answer
535 views

Is it consistent relative to ZF that $\frak c = \aleph_\omega$?

In ZFC we know that the continuum cannot have cofinality $\omega$. However, in the Feferman-Levy model we have that $\frak c=\aleph_1$, and that $\operatorname{cf}(\omega_1)=\omega$. In fact in the ...
3
votes
1answer
222 views

Is the ordering principle preserved in generic extensions?

The ordering principle says that every set can be linearly ordered. In a previous question Why are some axioms preserved in generic extensions? Asaf Karagila asked which axioms are preserved in ...
5
votes
2answers
641 views

Why are some axioms preserved in generic extensions?

It is a known theorem that for a model of $ZF$, $M$, if $M\models AC$ and $G$ is a $P$-generic filter over $M$, for some $P\in M$, then $M[G]\models AC$. On the other hand, it is long known that ...
10
votes
4answers
837 views

Forcing over models without the axiom of choice

In the vast majority of papers forcing is always developed over ZFC. Not surprisingly too, since infintary combinatorial principles are often used to prove results based on properties such as chain ...
13
votes
1answer
1k views

Countable Unions And The Axiom Of Countable Choice

Let us denote by ACC the axiom of countable choice, namely the assertion that the product of countably many non-empty sets is non-empty, and denote by UCC the assertion that a countable union of ...
6
votes
1answer
344 views

Symmetric extensions and class forcing

Suppose $V\models ZFC$ and $P\in V$ is a poset of forcing conditions. It is a basic theorem in forcing that $V[G]\models ZFC$ for any generic extension by a $V$-generic filter $G$. It is also known ...
4
votes
1answer
271 views

Does ZF prove that proximity spaces are completely regular?

(This is based on my earlier question, but I think this one would be easier to answer.) Let $\langle X,\mathbf{\delta} \hspace{.01 in} \rangle$ be a separated proximity space, and let ...
9
votes
3answers
690 views

On a weak choice principle

[PLEASE SEE EDITS AT BOTTOM OF QUESTION] Consider the following set-theoretic axiom: For each set $X$ there exists a set-indexed collection $\{C_i \to X\}_{i\in I_X}$ of surjections such that for ...
2
votes
1answer
1k views

Axiom of choice and non measurable set

We know that existence of a Lebesgue non-measurable set is consistent with the Axiom Of Choice. Is the converse true? That is, does the existence of a Lebesgue non-measurable set imply the Axiom Of ...
13
votes
0answers
567 views

Does ZF prove that topological groups are completely regular?

Let $\mathbf{G} = \langle G,\cdot,\mathcal{T}\;\rangle$ be a topological group. Let $\mathbf{e}$ be the identity element of $\langle G,\cdot \rangle$. Assume $\{\mathbf{e}\}$ is closed in $\langle ...
2
votes
1answer
345 views

Can a Vitali Set be constructed without AC?

For the purposes of this discussion, let a Vitali Set be any subset $V\subseteq{}[0,1)$ such that for $V_q:=\{x+q\;|\;x<1-q,\;x\in{}V\}\cup\{x+q-1\;|\;x\geq{}1-q,\;x\in{}V\}$ there is a countable ...
18
votes
2answers
2k views

Can a Vitali set be Lebesgue measurable? (ZF)

Here is the definition of Lebesgue measure. The standard proof that Vitali sets are not Lebesgue measurable uses countable additivity of Lebesgue measure, which is not a theorem of ZF. (In ...
7
votes
1answer
323 views

For models of ZF, if for some $A$ we have $L[A] = L$, what can we deduce about $A$?

Suppose $V$ is a model of ZF. Within $V$ we have $L$ which is a model of ZFC, furthermore $L[A]$ is a model of choice for every $A\in V$. Suppose $A=\emptyset$ then clearly $L[A]=L$, furthermore if ...
16
votes
2answers
675 views

Haar measures in Solovay's model

Haar measure is a measure on locally compact abelian groups which is invariants to translations. For example, the Lebesgue measure on the reals is such measure. It can be shown without the use of the ...
17
votes
2answers
958 views

Axiom of Choice: Ultrafilter vs. Vitali set

It is well known that from a free (non-principal) ultrafilter on $\omega$ one can define a non-measurable set of reals. The older example of a non-measurable set is the Vitali set, a set of ...
27
votes
2answers
1k views

On the difference between two concepts of even cardinalities: Is there a model of ZF set theory in which every infinite set can be split into pairs, but not every infinite set can be cut in half?

An interesting question has arisen over at this math.stackexchange question about two concepts of even in the context of infinite cardinalities, which are equivalent under the axiom of choice, but ...
6
votes
5answers
864 views

Is Lebesgue/Borel non-measurability actually caused by non-uniqueness?

In ZFC, every construction of a Lebesgue or Borel non-measurable set uses the axiom of choice. None of them that I've seen use choice to define a unique set, even though it's entirely possible to do ...
15
votes
1answer
869 views

Axiom of choice and bases of vector spaces over a fixed field

Let $k$ be a field. In 1984 Andreas Blass proved that the axiom "for every extension $K|k$, every vector space over $K$ has a basis" implies the axiom of choice. He also raised the question Does ...
16
votes
3answers
2k views

Half Cantor-Bernstein Without Choice

I had a discussion with one of my teachers the other day, which boiled to the following question: Assume ZF. Let $A,B$ be sets such that there exist $f\colon A\to B$ which is injective and ...
11
votes
2answers
741 views

Indecomposable vector spaces and the axiom of choice

It is a known result by A. Blass that the axiom of choice is equivalent to the assertion that every vector space has a basis. (Rubin's Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice: form B) It is also known ...
2
votes
0answers
246 views

algebraic dual and axiom of choice

If $K$ is a field, the dual of $K^{({\mathbb N})}$ is $K^{\mathbb N}$, and axiom of choice implies that the natural map from $K^{({\mathbb N})}$ to the dual of $K^{\mathbb N}$ is far from being ...
4
votes
3answers
614 views

Chevalley's valuation extension theorem and the axiom of choice

Hello, Do we know if the axiom of choice is needed for Chevalley's valuation/place extension theorem (i.e. the theorem that states that for every valued field and a field extension, one can extend ...
6
votes
3answers
601 views

Reference Request: Independence of the ultrafilter lemma from ZF

I'm looking for references for the following facts concerning the ultrafilter lemma (~ "there exist non-principal ultrafilters"): The ultrafilter lemma is independent of ZF. ZF + the ultrafilter ...
8
votes
1answer
2k views

Are there any non-linear solutions of Cauchy's equation ($f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$) without assuming the Axiom of Choice?

Let $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be s.t. $f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y), \ \forall x, y$ It is quite obvious that this implies $f(cx)=cx$ for all $c \in \mathbb{Z}$ and even further: $\forall c \in ...
3
votes
1answer
363 views

How much choice do we need for regularity of product of regular spaces ?

It is usually stated that the (possibly uncountable) product of regular topological spaces is regular. However the only proof that I know of this fact seems to use the full axiom of choice : See ...
2
votes
2answers
648 views

Countable Fields with No Countable Extension

Let $\mathscr{S}$ be the set of all countable subfields of $\mathbb{C}$. Clearly, $\mathscr{S}$ is a partially ordered set under inclusion, and if $K_1\subseteq K_2 \subseteq \cdots$ is an ascending ...
1
vote
4answers
819 views

If a result is apparently provable with AC, is actually independent of ZF?

Given the number of results that are independent of ZF. It seems that once you've found a proof of a theorem that uses the axiom of choice, the odds are that it will be independent of ZF. So my ...
8
votes
1answer
554 views

Axiom of Choice in a weaker system

Is it known whether or not there is a consistent system of logic where two or all of the axiom of choice, well-ordering principle, and Zorn's lemma have no (known) proof of equivalence? I was ...