The tag has no usage guidance.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

9
votes
0answers
124 views

Simplest example of failure of finite Galois descent in algebraic $K$-theory?

Let $E \to F$ be a $G$-Galois extension of fields. What is the simplest example where the natural map $K(E) \to K(F)^{hG}$ is not an equivalence on connective covers (i.e., where finite Galois ...
2
votes
0answers
150 views

K theory and derived categories

Some months ago I studied Beilinson's paper about generators for the derived category of $\mathbb{P}^n$, "Coherent Sheaves on $\mathbb{P}^n$ and problems of linear algebra". As next step, I moved to ...
11
votes
2answers
436 views

Equivalence of various definitions of arithmetic Chow groups

If I understand correctly, $n$-th arithmetic Chow group of arithmetic variety $X$ is defined as a quotient of the group of pairs of the form $(\sum\limits_in_iZ_i, g)$ where $Z := \sum\limits_in_iZ_i$ ...
4
votes
0answers
117 views

On non-vanishing of Milnor K-groups for infinite fields

It is well-known that for $n \geq 2$ and a finite field $k$, the Milnor $K$-group $K_n ^M (k)$ vanishes. I don't know who proved this first, but if curious, you may look at somewhere in Srinivas's ...
5
votes
1answer
97 views

Why is $\operatorname{nr}_{F[G]}:K_1(F[G])\to Z(F[G])^\times$ a bijection?

Let $A$ be a finite dimensional semisimple $F$-algebra and $K_1(A)$ the Whitehead group of $A$. By splitting $A$ into its Wedderburn components, the reduced norm map $\operatorname{nr}_A:K_1(A)\to ...
3
votes
0answers
167 views

Passing motivic decompositions from rational to algebraic equivalence

It is well known that there are several adequate equivalence relations for algebraic cycles (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adequate_equivalence_relation for a list including definitions). The ...
3
votes
2answers
205 views

Milnor-Witt K-theory for finite fields

Are $K^{MW}_*(\mathbb{F_q})$ and $K^{MW}_n(\mathbb{F_q})$ already known? Where can I read about it?
16
votes
0answers
307 views

Is this a model for $K$-theory of a triangulated category?

The recent question Complete the following sequence: point, triangle, octahedron, . . . in a dg-category reminded me of something I wanted to clarify long time ago; most likely this is now well known ...
7
votes
0answers
178 views

How bad can $SK_1$ of a commutative ring be?

For a commutative ring $R$ define $\mathrm{SK}_1(n, R)=\mathrm{SL}(n, R)/\mathrm{E}(n, R)$, the quotient of the special linear group by its subgroup generated by the elementary matrices. When ...
4
votes
0answers
139 views

Affine Steinberg groups vs Steinberg groups over Laurent polynomials

Let $R$ be a commutative ring and $\Phi$ be a finite (also called spherical) reduced irreducible root system of rank $\geq 2$. I will denote by $\mathrm{St}(\Phi,R)$ the Steinberg group of type $\Phi$ ...
4
votes
0answers
37 views

Waldhausen's regular coherent groups: torsionfree non-examples and behaviour under taking products?

Waldhausen defined a group $G$ to be regular coherent, if for all regular noetherian rings $R$ the group algebra $RG$ is regular coherent. (see Waldhausen - Algebraic $K$-Theory of generalized free ...
15
votes
1answer
590 views

Is there an ∞-categorical interpretation of the Quillen S⁻¹S construction?

The Quillen S⁻¹S construction (not to be confused with the Quillen Q-construction or the Quillen plus-construction), as defined by Grayson in Higher algebraic K-theory: II (page 219), takes as an ...
6
votes
1answer
114 views

Algebraic cobordism (of a point) outside the geometric diagonal

This question is about the state of current knowledge regarding Voevodsky's algebraic cobordism of a point $\mathrm{MGL}^{*,*}(\mathrm{Spec}\,k)$. That the geometric diagonal ...
6
votes
1answer
426 views

A generalized K- theory via generalized idempotents

Edit After the answer by Neil Strickland, I add the word "a ring" in this new version. In the literature, there is a concept of generalized idempotent: an n- idempotent is an element $a$ of a Banach ...
8
votes
0answers
171 views

Motivic cohomology of a point

I was wondering how much is known about the integral motivic cohomology groups of $\mathrm{Spec}\, k$, $H^{n,p}_{\mathrm{mot}}(\mathrm{Spec}\, k,\mathbb{Z})$. One knows that ...
1
vote
0answers
78 views

Reference: Relative cohomology of a morphism

Let $f\colon Y \to X$ be a morphism of schemes, the inverse image in $K$-theory always fit into a long exact sequence $$ \cdots \to K_i(f)\to K_i(X) \xrightarrow {f^*} K_i(Y)\to \cdots $$ where the ...
7
votes
1answer
742 views

The saturation of Murray von Neumann relation

Edit: According to comment of Pace Nielsen, I remove question 2 of the previous version: Let $R$ be a unital ring. We define Murray Von Neumann relation $M$ on $R$ as follows: We say $a M b$ iff ...
18
votes
2answers
658 views

References for $K_{4k}(\mathbb{Z})$

Weibel's "Algebraic K-theory of rings of integers in local and global fields" says $K_{4k}(\mathbb{Z})$ are known to have odd order, with no prime factors less than $10^7$, but are conjectured to be ...
3
votes
2answers
68 views

$V(A)$ semi group of equivalent projections in $M_∞(A)$ cancelative?

I found in the book of Murphy, C*- Algebras and Operator Theory, the Theorem 7.1.2 : Let A be an unital C* algebra, the semi group $V(A)$ of equivalent projections (under Murray Von Neumann ...
1
vote
1answer
272 views

research articles in topology/geometry [closed]

There is a saying "Do you read the masters?" I want to read some basic papers in Topology/geometry... I can not clearly state what is basic as of now... My back ground includes course in ...
6
votes
1answer
419 views

K-Theory and Tame Symbol

This might be a little bit specific but here it goes. While reading a paper (Brauer-Manin pairing...) by Yamazaki, I encountered this definition. Let $V$ be a variety and $y$ be a one dimensional ...
11
votes
1answer
463 views

Plugging $1-x$ into Schur polynomials

I have a symmetric Laurent polynomial $f$ in $k$ variables expressed as a linear combination of Schur polynomials. I'd like to know what happens when I make the substitution $p(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\mapsto ...
10
votes
0answers
110 views

Finiteness of torsion in $\mathcal{K}_2$-cohomology

Let $F$ be a number field, $C$ be a smooth projective curve over $F$ and $\mathfrak{C}$ be a proper regular model. I am interested in $\mathcal{K}_2$-cohomology, i.e., Zariski cohomology of the sheaf ...
2
votes
0answers
174 views

Algebraic K theory, Karoubi completion and splitting

Suppose $\mathcal{C}\subset \mathcal{C}'$ is a pair of pre-triangulated smooth DG categories over a characteristic-zero basefield (say, $\mathbb{C}$), such that $\mathcal{C}$ is faithfully embedded in ...
9
votes
0answers
306 views

When does algebraic K theory behave like a cohomology theory

Let $\mathbb{F}$ be a field. Let $K(\mathbb{F})$ be its algebraic (Quillen) $K$-theory spectrum. Let $X$ be a (nice, finite CW) topological space and let $\text{Rep}\Omega(X)$ be the DG category of ...
5
votes
1answer
304 views

Waldhausen and Segal's delooping machinery

I was recently thinking about the proof of a theorem where Waldhausen compared the Segal's delooping machinery with his, in the case when the cofibration is splittable (sec.1.8 in 'Algebraic ...
9
votes
0answers
191 views

Algebraic K-theory of a ring.

I started to learn some algebraic $K$-theory and its relation to geometric topology problems. My question is : What is the list of rings such that all their algebraic $K$-theory groups are known ? I ...
6
votes
2answers
354 views

Pullback along Frobenius morphism

Let $X$ be a scheme over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ and let $F : X \to X$ be the absolute Frobenius morphism. If $\mathcal{L}$ is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module, then there is a natural ...
6
votes
2answers
451 views

K theory long exact sequence

(1) Suppose that $Z\subset X$ is a closed embedding, $U = X\setminus Z$ is the complement. If relevant, suppose that both $X, Z$ are smooth and even (if relevant) that the normal bundle of $Z\subset ...
11
votes
0answers
380 views

Goodwillie's notes from MSRI Lecture Series

Does anyone know where I can find an electronic version of Goodwillie's (unpublished) notes from the MSRI Lecture Series in Spring, 1990? They're mentioned/cited as such in work of Dundas-McCarthy, ...
6
votes
0answers
103 views

$K_0$ an $KH_0$ of a normal crossing variety

Let $k$ be a field (say, algebraically closed to fix the ideas) and let $X$ be a strict (aka simple) normal crossing variety over $k$, so that $X$ is union of regular varieties with intersection that ...
11
votes
1answer
878 views

When are representation rings special lambda-rings? (variations of an old question)

Status: Questions 2 and 4 answered in the negative. Questions 1 and 3 ARE STILL UNANSWERED, despite previous claims. On the third page of Wolfang K. Seiler's paper "lambda-rings and Adams ...
7
votes
2answers
200 views

An extension of $K$-theory to topological $^*$-algebras

What I have in mind is the following: a (sequence of) functor(s) $K_\bullet$ on the category of topological $^*$-algebras (with values in the category of commutative groups) that satisfies (among ...
4
votes
2answers
158 views

Differential structures and K-homology groups

What is an example of a (compact) manifold, which has two non-equivalent differential structures such that the K-homology groups are non-isomorphic? If no such example exists, i.e. "K-homology does ...
15
votes
1answer
527 views

Is SL(n,Z[x]) generated by transvections?

Is $\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{Z}[x])$ equal to $E(n,\mathbb{Z}[x])$, the subgroup generated by transvections?
14
votes
2answers
448 views

What does taking the graded algebra do to the Grothendieck group, and its relation to the Chow ring?

Let $X$ be a nonsingular variety. (Perhaps some/all of this works over more general smooth schemes, but let's stick to the simple case.) In, e.g., Fulton's Intersection Theory chapter 15, and Soule's ...
2
votes
0answers
151 views

Proof of Merkurjev's Theorem in “The Algebraic and Geometric Theory of Quadratic Forms”

I just have a little question about the above mentioned proof. I'm thinking for days, but I'm still not getting it. For those who have the book (or want to look it up via google books etc.), it's the ...
7
votes
0answers
123 views

Rings that are $K_0$ of finite groups

Is there a simple characterisation of all rings which appear as $K_0$ of finite groups? By $K_0$ of a finite group $G$ I mean $K_0(\mathbb C[G])$ which in the same as a ring of virtual characters of ...
4
votes
0answers
288 views

Pull-push formula?

There are many contexts in which the push-pull formula $f_*(f^*(\alpha)\cdot \beta) = \alpha \cdot f_*(\beta)$ holds. I am interesting mostly in the case of algebraic K-theory and Chow rings (under ...
2
votes
0answers
82 views

Centers of Noetherian Algebras and K-theory

I'll start off a little vauge: Let $E$ be a noncommutative ring which is finitely generated over its noetherian center $Z$. Denote by $\textbf{mod}\hspace{.1 cm} E$ the category of finitely ...
1
vote
1answer
128 views

When the restriction of derived equivalence to a summand is a derived equivalence as well

I have a question about the equivalence of derived categories. Let $\mathcal{A} = \mathcal{A}'\oplus \mathcal{A}''$ and $\mathcal{B} = \mathcal{B}' \oplus \mathcal{B}''$ are direct sum of abelian ...
3
votes
2answers
140 views

generalization of result on K_1 of $SL(n,R)$

Let R be a "nice" ring with 1 (e.g. Euclidean domain). Then the subgroup E(n,R) generated by the elements $I+te_{i,j}$ is equal to $SL(n,R)$. My question is as follows: Instead of $SL(n,R)$ I look ...
12
votes
4answers
2k views

“Must read” papers in algebraic K-theory?

I'm mainly interested (graduate student) in surgery theory and geometric topology. If I have a chance to suggest "must read" papers in geometric topology for beginner, I'm very glad to suggest ...
5
votes
2answers
456 views

Is the algebraic Grothendieck group of a weighted projective space finitely generated ?

This is to be confronted with Joseph Gubeladze' paper : "Toric varieties with huge Grothendieck group" !
12
votes
2answers
668 views

Homotopy groups of Fredholm operators

If $X$ is separable complex Hilbert space and $\mathcal{F}$ the topological space of Fredholm operators on $X$, then it is well-known, that $$ \pi_0(\mathcal{F}) = \mathbb{Z}\, , $$ i.e. the connected ...
20
votes
1answer
511 views

Group with finite outer automorphism group and large center

Does there exist a finitely generated group $G$ with outer automorphism group $\mathrm{Out}(G)$ finite, whose center contains infinitely many elements of order $p$ for some prime $p$? A motivation is ...
6
votes
0answers
452 views

Inverse Galois Problem…and parallelizable vector fields?

Usual approaches to the inverse Galois problem start with realizations of a group $G$ over a larger field, and then try to specialize to ${\Bbb Q}$. One could also start by building suitable objects ...
1
vote
1answer
88 views

Is there something like an “f-regular” $K$-theory?

Let $R$ be a ring and $f\in R$. Is there something like an $f$-regular $K$-theory group of $R$ based on the category of $f$-regular $R$-modules, i.e. modules that do not have any $f$-torsion? If ...
7
votes
1answer
377 views

Waldhausen Additivity in a More General Context

The following arose when I was thinking about a talk at the Midwest Topology Seminar: Background I want to consider a generalization of a Waldhausen-like structure on a category $C$ with 0-object ...
9
votes
0answers
107 views

Gersten complexes in Quillen's and Milnor's K-theories

Consider a good enough scheme $X$ (e.g. an algebraic variety over a field). Let $X_i$ be the set of points of dimension $i$ in $X$. Then we have the Gersten complex in Quillen's K-theory: $$ ...