Questions tagged [adjoint-functors]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
8 votes
1 answer
277 views

Reflective functors?

Let $C_0\subseteq C$ and $D_0\subseteq D$ be reflective subcategories with reflection functors $r_A$ and $r_B$. For any functor $F:C\to D$, we may consider the natural transformation $r_BF\eta_A:r_BF\...
John Pardon's user avatar
  • 18.3k
8 votes
0 answers
155 views

When is the Eilenberg-Moore category of a relative monad between two topoi a topos?

In the non-relative case, we have a theorem, that an Eilenberg-Moore category of algebras of a Monad $T$ on a topos is itself a topos if the monad in question has a right adjoint. Now how does this ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 699
8 votes
0 answers
172 views

Symmetric monoidal structures on the functor taking presheaves

Let $\mathrm{Cat}_\infty$ be the $\infty$-category of small $\infty$-categories, $\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L}$ be the $\infty$-category of presentable $\infty$-categories, and $\mathcal P(\mathcal C)$ be ...
W. Rether's user avatar
  • 405
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

Reference request: Who first proved that right adjoints preserve limits?

One of the most famous and unifying theorems in category theory is that right adjoints preserve limits. I wonder: Who was the first one to prove this fact? The notion of adjoint functors is, of course,...
user907616's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
447 views

Prof and the completion of Cat under right adjoints

In Bénabou's Les distributeurs, in which the bicategory of profunctors is introduced, Bénabou remarks (page 17, quoted below) that $\mathbf{Prof}$ may be viewed as the construction of a bicategory ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
7 votes
2 answers
984 views

Semantics-structure adjunction

In the discussion on the nLab article for monadic adjunctions, John Baez suggests and Mike Shulman confirms that the relationship between adjunctions and monads itself constitutes an adjunction called ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,009
7 votes
2 answers
175 views

(When) does a morphism of monad induce adjoint functors between categories of algebras?

For monads $S$ and $T$ on a fixed Abelian category $C$, a morphism of monads $\sigma: S\rightarrow T$ induces a functor between Eilenberg-Moore categories $\sigma^*:C^T\rightarrow C^S$. This functor ...
sysyphusV's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
384 views

Yves Diers's thesis ("Catégories localisables")

I am looking for a copy of Yves Diers's 1977 thesis Catégories localisables, which is the original reference for "multi-" category theory, such as multi-adjoints, multi-colimits, and so on. ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
7 votes
2 answers
973 views

CG spaces from the perspective of sheaves over compact Hausdorff spaces

A compactly generated space is a space $X$ such that $f : X \rightarrow Y$ is continuous if and only if $K \rightarrow X \stackrel{f}{\rightarrow} Y$ is continuous for each compact hausdorff space $K$....
user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
145 views

The change-of-monoid adjunction between categories of modules induced by a morphism of monoids

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a cocomplete closed symmetric monoidal category. Let $A, B$ be monoids in $\mathcal{M}$ and $f: A \rightarrow B$ be a morphism of monoids. The morphism $f$ induces the extension ...
Angelos's user avatar
  • 73
7 votes
1 answer
629 views

[Reference Request] The Definition of Adjoint Functors between dg-categories

Let $A$ and $B$ be two dg-categories, $F: A \rightarrow B$ and $G: B \rightarrow A$ are two functors. Then what is the definition that $F$ and $G$ form an adjoint pair? In my mind $F\dashv G$ ...
Zhaoting Wei's user avatar
  • 8,707
7 votes
0 answers
615 views

What is the left adjoint to base change of schemes?

Restriction of Scalars and Functoriality of Presheaves. Let $\phi\colon R\longrightarrow S$ be a morphism of rings. There is associated to $\phi$ a natural functor from $\mathrm{Alg}_S$ to $\mathrm{...
Emily's user avatar
  • 10.7k
7 votes
0 answers
390 views

bar-cobar or cobar-bar

What is the standard or best reference for the adjointnes of bar and cobar constructions?
Jim Stasheff's user avatar
  • 3,850
7 votes
0 answers
629 views

Constructing pointwise Kan extensions as adjoints to some functor

Background I'm working on formalizing some category theory in Coq at https://bitbucket.org/JasonGross/catdb. Currently, I'm in the process of formalizing pointwise Kan extensions. Partly because I'...
Jason Gross's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
1k views

Proving the Special Adjoint Functor Theorem from the general Adjoint Functor Theorem

Often, when dealing with adjoint functor theorems, people go about proving each one separately, from first principles if you will (this is the course taken in MacLane). However, the names suggest ...
Miha Habič's user avatar
  • 2,289
6 votes
2 answers
480 views

A specific property of bi-adjunction

Let $$I: C \rightleftarrows D: F$$ be biadjoint [1] functors between categories $C, D$. That is, $I$ is the left and also the right adjoint of $F$ (thus vice versa). Put in notations, it's $$ \cdots \...
Student's user avatar
  • 5,038
6 votes
2 answers
452 views

Adjoints for radical and socle functors

Let $R$ be a ring and $M$ be a $R$-module. Let $rad(M)$ be the radical of $M$, that is, the intersection of all maximal submodules of $M$. Moreover, let $soc(M)$ be the socle of $M$, that is, the sum ...
cl4y70n____'s user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
921 views

Adjunctions: Algebras of the induced monad VS. Coalgebras of the induced comonad.

Given an adjunction, we get a monad on one side and a comonad on the other side. What is the connection between their algebra and coalgebra categories? Are they allways equivalent? The example i have ...
Gerrit Begher's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
704 views

Exactness of an additive left Kan extension

Let $\phi:R\to S$ be a flat ring homomorphism and consider the induced adjoint pair $$\phi_!:R-Mod\rightleftarrows S-Mod:\phi^*,$$ where $\phi_!=(S\otimes_R -)$. The right adjoint $\phi^*$ is easily ...
Simone Virili's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
490 views

Which direction of the adjoint functor theorem is most useful?

In the daily life of a working mathematician which direction of the adjoint functor theorem is more useful? Unpacking, does one find it more useful to: a) prove that a functor admits an adjoint and ...
Dick Johnson's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
414 views

$\infty$-natural transformations and adjunctions

I'm having troubles proving these two related statements, which are immediate for 1-categories and should of course be true for $\infty$-categories: Given a natural transformation $\alpha: f \...
Giulio Lo Monaco's user avatar
6 votes
4 answers
2k views

Kan extensions and the yoneda embedding.

[Edit: For a category $C$ let $C^\wedge$ denote the category of presheaves on $C$.] Let $f:C\to D$ be a functor. Precomposition with $f^{op}$ induces a functor $f^\wedge:D^\wedge \to C^\wedge$. This ...
Gerrit Begher's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
270 views

Does every functor between Grothendieck categories have adjoints?

Let $F:\mathcal C\longrightarrow \mathcal D$ be an additive functor that preserves colimits. Suppose that $\mathcal C$ and $\mathcal D$ are Grothendieck categories. Does $F$ have a right adjoint? ...
Operadbeginner's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
2k views

Adjunctions between derived functors

Given an adjunction $F\dashv G$ between functors between Abelian categories, we know that $F$ is right exact and $G$ is left exact so there are derived functors $LF$ and $RG$ between (bounded above, ...
Eitan Chatav's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
456 views

Cofree Lie Coalgebra

I have problems finding anything about the cofree Lie coalgebra functor $\mathcal{L}ie^c$ out there. Basically all I found was that it appears in Harrison cohomology and that, given a $\mathbb{Z}$-...
Mark.Neuhaus's user avatar
  • 2,014
6 votes
0 answers
153 views

Drinfeld center of non-rigid closed monoidal categories

Context. The Drinfeld center of a rigid monoidal category $\mathcal{C}$ is again rigid. This is not hard to see: Given an object $X\in \mathcal{C}$ together with a half-braiding $\phi_X:X\otimes-\...
Max Demirdilek's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
246 views

Different levels of isomorphism/equivalence/adjunction between bicategories

What are all the different levels of 'isomorphism/equivalence/adjunction' we can have between bicategories? Do any of them 'collapse' to one-another? When working with $1$-categories, we have four ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,009
5 votes
1 answer
391 views

Not quite adjoint functors

What are standard and/or natural examples of pairs of functors $F:C\leftrightarrows D:G$ and unnatural bijections $\hom_D(Fx,y)\to\hom_C(x,Gy)$ for all $x$ and $y$? Can one do this so that the ...
Mariano Suárez-Álvarez's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
327 views

Uniqueness of $\infty$-adjoints

Adjoints in a 2-category are essentially unique, in the following strong sense. If $\mathbf{2}$ denotes the "walking arrow" category $(\cdot \to \cdot)$, then there is a 2-category $\mathrm{Adj}_1$ ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 65.1k
5 votes
1 answer
223 views

Lift a monad along a generic right adjoint

$\require{AMScd}$We have a neat way to lift a monad along a monadic right adjoint, through a distributive law: in a setting like $$ \begin{CD} X @. X \\ @VUVV @VVUV\\ C @>>T> C \end{CD}$$ if ...
fosco's user avatar
  • 13.2k
5 votes
1 answer
130 views

Adjoining extensions in bicategories

Given a bicategory $\mathcal K$, is there a universal construction of a bicategory $\mathcal K'$ and faithful locally fully faithful pseudofunctor $\mathcal K \hookrightarrow \mathcal K'$ such that ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
5 votes
1 answer
222 views

Non-uniqueness of $C$ with $f_!(C) = f_*(1_{\mathcal{C}})$

$\newcommand{\Cc}{\mathcal{C}}$ $\newcommand{\Dd}{\mathcal{D}}$ $\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}$ $\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}}$ $\newcommand{\tensor}{\otimes}$ $\newcommand{\colim}{\rm colim}$ $\...
Bastiaan Cnossen's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
667 views

"adjoint" =?= "inverse of composite endofunctor is uniform bi-composition"

Understanding adjoints has always been (and continues to be) a bit of a struggle for me. Today I stumbled upon a property of adjoint functors which seemed extremely intuitive to me. I was wondering ...
Adam's user avatar
  • 3,247
5 votes
1 answer
107 views

About small $\omega$-orthogonality classes and Gabriel-Ulmer duality

I am reading the paper http://www.numdam.org/article/CTGDC_2001__42_1_51_0.pdf fixing the implication $(ii)\Rightarrow (i)$ of Theorem 1.39 of Adamek-Rosicky's book. The correct statement is: if $\...
Philippe Gaucher's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
150 views

Finite well-completeness and the small object argument?

I'm reading a few papers on reflective factorization systems and I've just noticed they're all mentioning a procedure which seems very similar to the small object argument. First of all, some ...
Arrow's user avatar
  • 10.3k
5 votes
1 answer
312 views

Adjunctions with respect to profunctors

Let $P : W° \times Y \to \mathbf{Set}$ and $Q : X° \times V \to \mathbf{Set}$ be profunctors, and let $L : X \to W$ and $R : Y \to V$ be functors. Suppose that $$P(Lx, y) \cong Q(x, Ry)$$ natural in $...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
5 votes
1 answer
176 views

Adjunctions capturing duality between ideals and saturated monoids in a commutative ring?

Let $R$ be a commutative ring. A saturated monoid in $R$ is a multiplicative submonoid $S\subset R$ which is closed under divisors, i.e $xy\in S\implies x\in S$. This is the converse of the analogous ...
Arrow's user avatar
  • 10.3k
5 votes
1 answer
510 views

Do generalizations of adjoint functors, such as adjunctions in 2-categories, and multivariable adjunctions, have formulations in terms of something like universal morphisms?

I recently learned about two-variable adjunctions and multi-variable adjunctions, and about adjunctions in 2-categories. The nCatLab page on two-variable adjunctions talks about how to go from the ...
Jason Gross's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
170 views

When are topoi of coalgebras atomic?

A geometric morphism is atomic if its inverse image is logical. Now consider a Grothendieck topos $\varepsilon$ and its terminal geometric morphism $\Gamma : \varepsilon \rightarrow Set$, topos is ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 699
5 votes
0 answers
93 views

Left adjoints for functors out of a Deligne-Kelly tensor product

Let $k$ be a field, and let $\mathcal{C}$ be a locally finitely presentable $k$-linear categories. The Deligne-Kelly tensor product $\mathcal{C}\boxtimes\mathcal{C}$ is the 2-universal locally ...
Thibault Décoppet's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
117 views

Is the group Hopf algebra left and right adjoint?

Suppose that $G$ is a group and $k$ is a field. Then it is well known that the group ring (group algebra) functor $k[\bullet]$ is left adjoint to the group of units functor, the latter of which ...
Mark.Neuhaus's user avatar
  • 2,014
5 votes
0 answers
157 views

For which topological spaces does pullback along $\operatorname{ev}_0:B^I\to B$ have a right adjoint?

Let $B$ be a topological space. Consider the evaluation at zero of paths in $B$. This is a continuous map $\operatorname{ev}_0:B^I\to B$ where the domain carries the compact-open topology. For which ...
Arrow's user avatar
  • 10.3k
5 votes
0 answers
211 views

Free functors having a left adjoint

If $(T,\eta,\mu)$ is a monad over $C$ and $C^T$ is the category of $T$-algebras, is well known that the forgetful functor $U:C^T\to C$ has a left adjoint $F:C\to C^T$. Moreover, under certain ...
Luis Turcio's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
281 views

Map of adjunctions

The following question must have been asked dozens of times, but I do not recall any non-trivial results. Consider an adjoint square where the arrows indicate directions of $F, G, H, K$. $\require{...
Michal R. Przybylek's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
1k views

Why quasi-inverse functors are adjoint pairs?

Let $C$,$D$ be two category, and $F:C \rightarrow D$, $G:D \rightarrow C$ are two functors such that $FG \simeq Id_{D}$ and $GF \simeq Id_{C}$, Show that $(F,G)$ is an adjoint pair. To show this, we ...
Werther's user avatar
  • 59
4 votes
2 answers
509 views

Why is $Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})$ abelian? Does $Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})\rightarrow Func(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})$ admit a left-adjoint?

What is the best way to show, that $Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})$ is abelian, where $\mathcal{A}$ is an abelian category and $\mathcal{Ab}$ is the category of abelian groups from scratch? There is ...
Kathrin's user avatar
  • 41
4 votes
1 answer
515 views

Does the inclusion of presheaves into families of sets have a left adjoint?

Consider the inclusion of presheaves on $\mathbb{C}$ into families of sets indexed by $\mathbb{C}$-objects (which proceeds by forgetting the action on morphisms). Is there a left adjoint to this ...
Jonathan Sterling's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
355 views

A Question on Auto-Adjoint functors

Let $F: \mathscr{C}\to \mathscr{C}^{op}$, with an adjoint $G$, and $\eta: 1_\mathscr{C} \Rightarrow G\circ F $ and $\varepsilon: F\circ G\Rightarrow 1_{\mathscr{C}^{op}}$ with components (in $\...
Buschi Sergio's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
2k views

How is the right adjoint $f_*$ to the inverse image functor $f^*$ described for functor categories $Set^C$, $Set^D$ and $f : C \to D$

For $C,D$ small categories, and $f : C \to D$ a functor between them, there is a precomposition, or "inverse image", functor $f^* = (-) \circ f : Set^D \to Set^C$. It has a left and a right adjoint. ...
vincenzoml's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
253 views

Left adjoint for categories of commutative monoids?

The $n$Lab writes (prop. 2.2 in https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/category+of+monoids) : Let $C$ be a monoidal category with countable coproducts that are preserved by the tensor product. Then the ...
user84563's user avatar
  • 915