MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Theorem 9.12, Titchmarsh (The Theory of the Riemann Zeta Function) proved that

For every large positive T, $\zeta(s)$ has a zero $\beta+i\gamma$ satisfying $$ |\gamma-T|<\frac{A}{\log\log\log T} $$

Is it possible to determine $A$ and $T$ without assuming the Riemann hypothesis?


Are there any other known results (with explicit) around this question?

share|cite|improve this question

Theorem 9.12 in Titchmarsh says (in his shorthand style) there exists a constant $A$ such that for all sufficiently large T, (etc.)

The proof uses the Borel-Caratheodory theorem, and can be made effective if you really really want it. Titchmarsh has a series of seven successive constants $A_1, A_2,\ldots A_6, A$ with the final $A$ being the constant you reference above. This is not conditional on the Riemann Hypothesis.

It's not clear how your actual question relates to your title.

share|cite|improve this answer

do you want to determine T also? I thought the result should hold for all T?

share|cite|improve this answer
@Dierk. If so, it would be better, if not just to know if it is not large. for example if $A=1$ and $T<10^{10}$, it's OK. – asd Jun 12 '12 at 15:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.