MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

could anyone please help me? why is it impossible to embed a torus in R^3 with index 1 ( usual euclidean space with index 1 as a semi-riemannian manifold) as a semi-riemannian submanifold?

thanx. but i didn't understand. let me ask another question. why with this metric R^3 doesn't have any compact semi-riemannian submanifold?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Ricardo Andrade, Andrey Rekalo, Daniel Moskovich, Andrés E. Caicedo, BS. Sep 22 '13 at 7:24

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question does not appear to be about research level mathematics within the scope defined in the help center." – Ricardo Andrade, Andrey Rekalo, Daniel Moskovich, Andrés E. Caicedo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I suppose that by "usual" you mean $\mathbb{R}^3$ with the semi-Riemannian metric $dx^2 + dy^2 - dz^2$?

If so, for any compact surface $S$ embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$, since the metric is invariant under translation on $\mathbb{R}^3$ you are allowed to translate $S$ so that it is tangent to the light cone $x^2 + y^2 - z^2 = 0$. At any point of tangency the restricted metric is indefinite. To do this translation, first translate $S$ so that it is strictly inside the light cone, then let $S$ gently descend until the first moment that it touches the light cone.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.