MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am studying a special type of a sequence on the naturals which I am calling a weak arithmetic progression.

Formally I call a k-sequence $x_1< x_2 \cdots< x_k$ a weak arithmetic progression (WAP) if $\exists d\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $x_{i+1}-x_i\in\{1,d\}$. Now supposing all positive integers have been partitioned into two parts is there an upper bound on how many times a segment of $t$ consecutive numbers ($0\leq t\leq \frac{k-1}{2}$) in one part can occur without a WAP occurring in any one part?

share|cite|improve this question
    
Why can't I see the whole question? :S – Shahab Jun 5 '12 at 11:15
    
When I click edit I can see the whole question but otherwise I am seeing only one & a half sentences. Does anyone know why is this happening? – Shahab Jun 5 '12 at 11:20
1  
You have to leave a space after any < character, otherwise markdown will interpret it as a start of an HTML tag. Also, you need to double backslashes in commands like \{, \}, \\. – Emil Jeřábek Jun 5 '12 at 11:24
    
Ok, thanks for the information. – Shahab Jun 5 '12 at 11:38
1  
Is WAP also known as "bounded gaps"? If so, search that term for lots of info. – Gerald Edgar Jun 5 '12 at 12:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.