MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For a simplicial group $G$, there is a universal bundle $WG \to \overline{W}G$ in the category of simplicial sets, detailed in for example May's book (djvu).

Now $WG$ has a simple enough description in terms of $G$ that I would expect one could construct a contracting homotopy directly. Has this been done in the literature?

The proof in May's book (and in the original sources) that $WG$ is contractible goes via showing that $WG$ is 'of type (W)', and that such simplicial sets are Kan, simply-connected and have trivial homology.

share|cite|improve this question
How do these constructions relate to EG and BG? – Sean Tilson Jun 3 '12 at 4:08
Hi Sean, I didn't get a chance to answer your question, but it is as Peter May says in his answer. EG is the geometric realisation of the functor W applied to the constant simplicial group, and for this G can be a vanilla group, a topological group, or a group internal to any finite-product category $C$ with a geometric realisation/homotopy colimit functor $sC \to C$. – David Roberts Jun 3 '12 at 22:13

Pages 75-81 of Appendix A of ``On the theory and applications of differential torsion products'', Memoirs AMS 142 (1974), by V.K.A.M. Gugenheim and myself, gives a detailed treatment of the $W$-construction for simplicial augmented algebras over a commutative ring $R$. Not the answer to your question, but if I remember rightly, it should lift to an answer when suitably specialized; more precisely, the chain homotopy of Lemma A.16 (up to signs coming from variant choices) should specialize to one coming from a contracting homotopy as desired. When $G$ is a group regarded as a constant simplicial group, Lemma A.15 lifts to give an isomorphism between $WG$ and the simplicial set $E_*G$ whose realization is $EG$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, Peter, I'll check that out. Perhaps I should have mentioned that MacLane gave a contracting homotopy of the chain complex (non-normalised) associated to W of a simplicial ring in his original lecture on W and Wbar. – David Roberts Jun 3 '12 at 21:28
Lemma A.16, for anyone else who is reading. And recall that the memoir is available – David Roberts Jun 3 '12 at 22:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.