Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does every countable, infinite, amenable, periodic group $G$ contain an infinite locally finite subgroup?

Remarks:

  1. I would be happy with an infinitely generated counterexample as long as it is countable.

  2. A counterexample cannot be elementary amenable, as elementary amenable periodic groups are locally finite.

  3. First Grigorchuk's group is not a counterexample: it is a 2-group, and hence it contains an infinite abelian group (by a result of Held, "On abelian subgroups of infinite 2-groups").

  4. Amenability of $G$ is essential, due to existence of Tarski monsters whose subgroups are finite cyclic (constructed by Olshanskii).

  5. Any infinite locally finite group contains an infinite abelian subgroup (see a paper of Hall-Kulatilaka here, so it is equivalent to ask whether $G$ contains an infinite abelian subgroup.

  6. This question was asked here in 2008, so perhaps it is an open problem.

share|improve this question
3  
certainly (1) does not help: indeed if your group is not locally finite, it contains an infinite f.g. subgroup and hence this subgroup also satisfies your requirements. –  YCor Jun 1 '12 at 17:14
    
As far as I remember, Grigorchuk also constructs f.g. $p$-groups for $p \neq 2$ of intermediate growth. Could these serve as counterexamples? –  Ashot Minasyan Jun 1 '12 at 18:42
    
@Yves, thank you. @Ashot, I do not know the literature, which is why I ask here; there are of course other periodic amenable groups. –  Igor Belegradek Jun 1 '12 at 19:10

1 Answer 1

@Ashot, Grigorchuk $p$-groups are branch, so one can easily construct infinite abelian subgroups as well. As generators one can just take elements from rigid stabilizers of different vertices, such that none of these vertices is a prefix of the other. So these groups don't provide counterexamples.

share|improve this answer
    
I meant adding this as a comment, but couldn't find the link to do it. –  Dima Savchuk Jun 2 '12 at 12:05
    
@Dima: I think, you need reputation $\ge 50$ to comment. –  Misha Jun 2 '12 at 13:08
    
@Dima: thank you, and welcome to mathoverflow. I think you can leave comments only after you earn enough reputation points; not sure how many is needed. –  Igor Belegradek Jun 2 '12 at 13:08
    
@Dima: thanks for your comment. This gives an argument that does not involve Held's theorem. –  Ashot Minasyan Jun 4 '12 at 13:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.