Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.


All iterative solvers I've been able to find are for a system Ax = b where b is a vector. Does anyone know of general iterative solvers for AX = B where X, B are matrices, or more specifically finding the inverse A^-1? (Assuming A is large and sparse.)


share|cite|improve this question
If $B$ has $r$ columns, you can solve $AX=B$ by calling your $Ax=b$ solver $r$ times. As Federico points out, it's almost invariably a mistake to compute $A^{-1}$. finally this question is not appropriate for this site. – Chris Godsil May 30 '12 at 22:00

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Unless your matrices have a special structure, both $A^{-1}$ and $A^{-1}B$ are dense (full), general matrices without any special properties. Even storing them in memory will be prohibitive.

The short answer is: don't do it. :)

The long answer is: look for structure in your matrices, and exploit it. If there is no structure and you really need to perform this computation, then your best bet is using an exact solver, not an iterative one. It will be extremely slow ($O(N^3)$ time and $O(N^2)$ storage), but there are no shortcuts.

share|cite|improve this answer
In my case the entries of A^-1 have a probabilistic interpretation, so I need to at least approximate the inverse. A is sparse because I'm making some approximations (it would otherwise be dense). I was hoping the approximations would lead to a block diagonal structure where the largest block was tractable for exact solvers, but this was not the case. However, I believe the structure may be almost block diagonal, leading to a sparse inverse. – Nicholas Andrews May 30 '12 at 22:04
Have you actually tried any canned software to see if your conjecture is correct? – Igor Rivin May 30 '12 at 23:54
What is the probabilistic interpretation of the entries of $A^{-1}$? Are you looking for the entries of a covariance matrix of the form $(X^{T}X)^{-1}$ for example? "Almost Block Diagonal" really isn't gonig to be enough to help here- as soon as you've got one entry linking two blocks, you can get fill in of the linking block in the inverse matrix. – Brian Borchers May 31 '12 at 3:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.