MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hello, as we know, the (finite) Blaschke product $P$ in $\mathbb{C}$ or in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ is defined by $\prod_{j=1}^{k} \frac{z-a_j}{1-\bar{a_j}z}, a_j \in \mathbb{D}$. I was wondering whether there are similar definitions of (finite) Blaschke products in higher ( real ) dimensions,in $\mathbb{R}^n$, $n \geq 3$.

I think, to construct Blaschke product in higher dimensions, we need to keep in mind that $P$ maps $\mathbb{B}^n$ to itself, and $|P(x)|\to 1$ as $ |x| \to 1 $ and $P(\frac{1}{\bar{z}})= \frac{1}{\bar{P(z)}}$.

I myself was trying to define a product of two vectors in $\mathbb{R}^3$ by defining the map using the spherical polar co-ordinates : $P(v,w)= P (v=(r_1,\theta_1,\phi_1), w=(r_2,\theta_2, \phi_2))= (r_1.r_2, \theta_1+\theta_2, \phi_1+\phi_2 )$, resembling the multiplication of complex numbers. But then the question becomes, in order to define Blachke product of say at least two maps, what kind of maps we should really multiply. There is no concept of holomorphic maps on $\mathbb{R}^3$, but we can try to replace them by conformal automorphism of $\mathbb{B}^n$, keeping in mind that $ \frac{z-a_j}{1-\bar{a_j}z}, a_j \in \mathbb{D}$ are conformal automorphisms of $ \mathbb{D}= \mathbb{B}^2$.

Before proceeding more, I was checking with the math community whether this is the standard way to define higher dimensional Blaschke products, or there are other standard way(s) to define them.Please let me know or cite any reference(s) you know. Thanks !

share|cite|improve this question
A word of warning: you first need to think about what you mean by multiplying elements of ${\mathbb R}^n$ when $n\geq 3$. – Yemon Choi May 29 '12 at 0:19
@ Yemon Choi : I meant the following map in $\mathbb{R}^3 \prod \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^3 $ : $P(v,w)= P (v=(r_1,\theta_1,\phi_1), w=(r_2,\theta_2, \phi_2))= (r_1.r_2, \theta_1+\theta_2, \phi_1+\phi_2 )$. This corresponds to the geometric definition of product of two complex numbers in $\mathbb{C}$. – Analysis Now Jun 7 '12 at 3:41
@ Yemon Choi : ...complex numbers written in the polar co-ordinates $(r, \theta)$, with the identification : $z= re^{i \theta}$ – Analysis Now Jun 7 '12 at 3:44

A key word to look for is "inner function". These are bounded analytic functions on the ball where the limit along any radius to the boundary exists with modulus equal to one almost everywhere. These are the useful equivalent of Blashke products to $\mathbb{C}^n$ - they are useful in rigging up holomorphic functions with particular boundary conditions. The construction of such functions was quite a feat - they were thought not to exist for a long time. It was conjectured that they didn't exist in 1965, and the first examples were constructed in 1982.

A good reference is chapter 9 of Krantz's "Several Complex Variables".

share|cite|improve this answer
@ Steven Gubkin : True, but that way you can define inner functions in even real dimensions only, how can you define something like that in $\mathbb{R}^n$, where $n$ is odd ? You don't have the complex structure there, but you can still talk about conformal maps, which are merely angle-preserving maps. And if you have a suitable definition of product in $\mathbb{R}^n, n$ even or odd, then you can use that product to define some product of conformal maps. – Analysis Now Jun 7 '12 at 3:48
@ Steven Gubkin : Also, Blaschke products in $\mathbb{C}$ are just proper holomorphic functions on the open unit disk in $\mathbb{C}$. But I am aware of a ( which I guess non-trivial ) result that states : proper holomorphic functions from the open unit disk in $\mathbb{C}^n, n > 1$ to itself are biholomorphism of the open unit disk. – Analysis Now Jun 7 '12 at 3:53
** By the functions on the open unit disk I meant the functions from the open unit disk to itself . – Analysis Now Jun 7 '12 at 3:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.