I want to know that whether follow equality holds: $ |N_G(C_G(a)):C_G(a)|=|a^G\cap C_G(a)|.$ It is easy to see that the left hand is no more than the right hand. I think this equality does not hold, but I can't find a counter example.
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
0
1
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
6
|
Take $G$ to be a symmetric group of degree at least 5, and $a$ a transposition. |
|||
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
1
|
Write $C$ for $C_G(a)$ and $N$ for $N_G(C_G(a))$. Although, as Jeremy has demonstrated, the equality $|N:C| = |a^G\cap C|$ does not hold in general, it seems to me that there is a chance of characterising when it is true. Consider, for instance, the situation when $C$ is a TI-subgroup. That is to say, $|C\cap C^g|$ is equal to ${1}$ or $G$ for every $g\in G$. I think it's fairly clear that in this case one does indeed have $$|N:C| = |a^G\cap C|.$$ It seems to me that something like a converse might also be true. I don't have the wherewithal to work this through right now but I will try and return to it in due course... Edit: As Mark has pointed out in comments below, the TI-condition is too strong if we want to characterise when $$|N:C| = |a^G\cap C|.$$ The condition that we want is this: $$x\in G\backslash N \Longrightarrow h^x \not\in H.$$ The contrapositive might be clearer: $$h^x \in H \Longrightarrow x\in N.$$ Clearly the TI-condition implies this, but it also accounts for the example given by Mark... And it's quite easy to see that it precisely characterizes when $|N:C| = |a^G\cap C|.$ |
|||||||||||||||||||
|

