# Subgroups of GL_2 over a finite field

I've come across the phrase "by the classification of subgroups of $GL_2(F_q)$" in multiple papers, but never with a reference. Here $F_q$ is a finite field of size $q$. Does anyone know a good reference for this (ideally for someone who is not a group theorist)?

-
I think the classification is Borel, (Split or nonsplit) Cartan, or the exceptionals'', which are projectively $A_4$, $A_5$, $S_4$. See Lang or Serre for more details. – Barinder Banwait May 15 '12 at 21:17
Barinder, it's more complicated than that: $GL_2(\mathbb F_p)$ is a subgroup of $GL_2(\mathbb F_q)$ is $q=p^e$ which your classification forgets, for example. – Joël Feb 20 '14 at 1:29

## 3 Answers

At the text-book level, take a look at Lang's Algebra, Chapter XVIII, Section 12, in my version is on page 712. Seems to be pretty thorough.

There is also section 2 of Serre's 1972 Propriétés galoisiennes des points d'ordre fini des courbes elliptiques''.

-
Barinder, this answer is not really helpful. Serre's section 2 is titled "Sous-groupe de $GL_2(\mathbb F_p)$", not $\mathbb F_q", and Lang is far from thorough on this question. – Joël Feb 24 '14 at 20:42 Dickson is responsible for the classification of subgroups of$SL_2(\mathbb{F}_q)$(and once you've got this the subgroups of$GL_2(\mathbb{F}_q)$are easy). You can find a full proof in Suzuki's "Group Theory Part I". It's Chapter 6, Section 3 of that book. If you email me I'll even send you a copy :-) - This classification was well-known already in the beginning of XXth century; perhaps this explains why people do not bother to give a reference (the result was due to E.H.Moore and, independently, Wiman). Many years ago I read the paper by Howard H. Mitchell, Determination of the ordinary and modular ternary linear groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1911), no. 2, 207–242, which addresses the analogous question for$GL_3(\mathbb{F}_q)$, and also contains the detailed information on the subgroups of$GL_2(\mathbb{F}_q)\$. (It's of course not so easy to read, as the terminology was quite different...)

-