6

1

The basic question that I have is in the title, but let us make it more rigorous below.

Let $N={1, 2, ..., n}$, and put the (normalized) counting measure, $\mu_n$, on $N\times N$.

Let $\mathcal{S}_n= { (a, b)\in N\times N: gcd(a, b)=1}$

and $x_n=\mu_n(\mathcal{S}_n).$

Then what is the assymptotic behavior of $x_n$ as $n\rightarrow\infty$.

flag
shreevatsa.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/… – Micah Milinovich May 15 2012 at 20:03
Answer on MathWorld, equation (1): mathworld.wolfram.com/RelativelyPrime.html – Yoav Kallus May 15 2012 at 20:03
3 
This is pretty marginal, level-wise. – Igor Rivin May 15 2012 at 20:26
4 
A good question, but not a question of any research interest, as the answer can be found in entry-level Number Theory textbooks - and this website is for questions of research interest. – Gerry Myerson May 15 2012 at 23:06
4 
The margin is too small to contain it. – Noam D. Elkies May 16 2012 at 1:16
show 1 more comment

closed as too localized by Charles, Igor Rivin, Felipe Voloch, Gerry Myerson, Andy Putman May 16 2012 at 1:39

3 Answers

14

The probability tends to $\frac{1}{\zeta(2)}=\frac{6}{\pi^2}$ as was mentioned by Qiaochu. This actually generalizes to arbitrary number fields, and is a less commonly known fact.

In fact in any number field, the probability that two ideals are relatively prime is given by $1/\zeta_K(2)$, where $\zeta_K$ is the Dedekind zeta function of the number field $K$. And is proven in a similar way to the classical result. Here is a reference: "The probability of relative primality of Gaussian integers". For example the analogous probability for Gaussian integers is $6/(\pi^2G)$ where $G=1-\frac{1}{3^2}+\frac{1}{5^2}+\cdots$ is the Catalan constant.

link|flag
2 
A reference for the general "less commonly known fact" is Schanuel, S.H.: Heights in number fields, *Bull. Soc. Math. France* 107 (1979), 433–449. It is true also using field elements in place of ideals. A function-field analogue was announced by Serre in Lectures on the Mordell-Weil Theorem (F. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig 1989) and proved independently but in the same way by S.DiPippo (*Spaces of Rational Functions on Curves Over Finite Fields*, Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard, 1990) and D.Wan (Heights and Zeta Functions in Function Fields, in The Arithmetic of Function Fields (1992)... – Noam D. Elkies May 16 2012 at 1:24
1 
...... likewise $1/\zeta_K(n)$ is the probability that $n>1$ ideals or field elements have no common factor. This also lets you asymptotically count rational points up to a given height in projective space over $K$. Here's why I had to look up these references some years ago: arxiv.org/pdf/math/0104115v1.pdf – Noam D. Elkies May 16 2012 at 1:26
7

This is a very standard counting problem in analytic number theory. Here's a rigorous proof: It is enough to derive an asymptotic formula for $$\sum_{a,b\leq n, (a,b)=1} 1 $$ This is $$\sum_{a,b\leq n, d|a, d|b} \mu(d) $$ $$=\sum_{d\leq n} \mu(d)\sum_{k\leq n/d , l\leq n/d} 1$$ $$=\sum_{d\leq n} \mu(d) ((n/d)^2 + O(n/d) ) $$ $$=n^2\sum_{d\leq n} \mu(d)/d^2 + O(n\log n)$$ $$=n^2\sum_{d=1}^{\infty} \mu(d)/d^2 + O(n) + O(n\log n)$$. $$=n^2 6/\pi^2 + O(n\log n).$$

link|flag
6

The probability is $\frac{6}{\pi^2} = \frac{1}{\zeta(2)}$. A sketch of a proof can be found in this blog post (actually I only show, more or less, that if the density exists it must be $\frac{6}{\pi^2}$).

link|flag

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.