Welcome to MathOverflow

Question

9

3

Assume we have a Riemann surface, the underlying topological surface of which is a sphere with (possibly uncountably many) points removed. Can we always conformally embed this Riemann surface in the Riemann sphere? If not, can someone suggest a counter example?

edited May 12 2012 at 18:39

asked May 12 2012 at 18:23

uncooltoby
307●1●4

	Could you please edit your question to describe the kind of embedding you're interested in? – Ryan Budney May 12 2012 at 18:30
	Isometrically? Conformally? Topologically? Topologically obviously yes, isometrically obviously no - just take a very bumpy sphere with nonconstant curvature. – Will Sawin May 12 2012 at 18:31

Misha · Accepted Answer · 2012-05-12 19:24:48Z UTC

See e.g. here:

Theorem 3.2.7. Any planar connected Riemann surface is biholomorphic to an open subset of $S^2$.

The proof is very straightforward: Exhaust a genus $0$ surface $S$ by relatively compact domains $D_n$ each of which necessarily has genus $0$. For each $D_n$ find a conformal embedding $f_n$ to $S^2$. Now, normalize the family of mappings $f_n$ to to send a point $x\in D_1$ to a fixed point $z\in {\mathbb C}$ and to have unit derivative (in a chart) at $x$. Then use normality of the family of maps $f_n$ to get the limit (for a subsequence). Lastly, check that the limit is injective. This is the same argument Caratheodory used in his proof of uniformization theorem.

Igor Rivin · Answer 2 · 2012-05-12 19:07:09Z UTC

0

Unless I am confused, why not add the points back, map the resulting surface to the Riemann sphere conformally by unifomization, then remove the images of the offending points?

answered May 12 2012 at 19:07

Igor Rivin
31.1k●3●37●71

@Igor: It is not as simple. The assumption is the surface embeds topologically to $S^2$. The conclusion is that there exists a conformal embedding. – Misha May 12 2012 at 19:26

1

I think the problem with this is that you are assuming the sphere had a complex structure before the points were removed, which might not be the case. For example assume we take a topological sphere $X$ and remove one point $x$. Then topologically $D = X \setminus \{ x \}$is a disc and we can give it the conformal structure of a disc. However there is no homeomorphism from $X$ to the Riemann sphere which embeds $D$ conformally. This is because the image of $D$ must be the whole of the Riemann sphere minus one point, and thus be conformally equivalent to the plane by the uniformization theorem. – uncooltoby May 12 2012 at 19:40

@Igor: I think, I understood the source of confusion. Indeed, if the surface has finite typological type, it is easy to "fill in the holes": Take annuli around the holes, embed them conformally in $S^2$ (since every annulus is conformal to a round annulus or the punctured disk) and then attach disks conformally along the annuli ("fill in the holes"). This is all fine, but it does not work if your surface is homeomorphic to, say, $S^2$ minus Cantor set. Then one has to use the "proof by exhaustion" argument I outlined above. – Misha May 12 2012 at 20:01

Yes, all true. I guess the point is that I was not sure what the assumptions were... – Igor Rivin May 12 2012 at 20:55

Embedding a Riemann surface in the sphere

Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

2 Answers

You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.