MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm now studying KdV Equation$$u_t-6uu_x+u_{xxx}=0$$To solve the initial-value problem,we can use method of Lax pair,so we can alter the original problem to the problem of solving out $u$ in the Schrodinger Equation $\psi_{xx}-(u-\lambda)\psi=0$. This is called inverse scattering method.My problem is the extension of this. From that, I know the spectrums are all real, with discrete spectrum $\lambda_n<0,n=1,2,...m$,and the continuous spectrum $\lambda>0$.

If I consider the perturbed KdV Equation$$u_t-6uu_x+u_{xxx}=\epsilon u$$,I want to know whether I can still alter it to the problem of solving $u$ in the Schrodinger equation.If it does,what will happen to spectrum of the corresponding Schrodinger Equation,for instance,the change of the value of the spectrum,whether the spectrum is still real?

share|cite|improve this question
Given that the perturbed equation is no longer Hamiltonian, it is extremely unlikely that any Lax pair formulation exists for the modified equation. (Note that only a very small minority of PDE are actually completely integrable.) So my guess is that only perturbative expansions or convergent schemes of approximations will be available to construct solutions, as opposed to exact solutions obtained via inverse scattering. – Terry Tao May 9 '12 at 13:51
@89085731: This is just a rewriting of the Schroedinger equation. Check Miura et al. paper. – Jon May 9 '12 at 15:02
@Jon:Sorry for that.I get your meaning. – 89085731 May 9 '12 at 15:09
@Terry Tao:I have rearranged my question… you help me? – 89085731 May 12 '12 at 7:10

I will follow the original paper as much as I can. So, let us consider the solution of the equation

$$u_t-6uu_x+u_{xxx}=\epsilon u.$$

You will have a general solution $u=u(x,t;\epsilon)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\epsilon^n u_n(x,t)$ after a power expansion on $\epsilon$. Now, turning your attention to the Schroedinger equation


you will notice that the problem is now

$$\psi_{xx}-[u_0(x,t)+\epsilon u_1(x,t)+\ldots-\lambda]\psi=0$$

and this is amenable to standard Rayleigh-Schroedinger perturbation theory. This means that the first correction preserves the discrete nature of the spectrum and will be real yet. You can iterate this procedure going to higher orders in $\epsilon$ still preserving the inverse scattering method. This can be seen in the follwing way. From the given Schroedinger equation one has


The condition granting that this solves KdV equation is $\lambda_t=0$ when $\psi\rightarrow 0$ given $|x|\rightarrow\infty$ and $u$ evolves by KdV equation. This must be true also for the approximate solution. So, from this equation we can evaluate the next-to-leading order correction by setting

$$\lambda=\lambda_0+\epsilon\lambda_1+\ldots$$ $$\psi = \psi_0+\epsilon\psi_1+\ldots$$

and we get


and so




Turning back to KdV equation for the leading order one has


and this is exactly the problem solved by inverse scattering method that we recover as it should. The next-to-leading order correction gives:


that is a linear equation. We notice here that we are consistent with the condition $\psi_1\rightarrow 0$ when $|x|\rightarrow\infty$ provided this is true for $\psi_0$ and this grants also $u_1\rightarrow 0$ as it should. One can check at this point that this is equivalent on doing the same perturbation approach on the scattering problem for the inverse scattering method (see eq.(5) in the original paper by Miura et al.).

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm wondering how you can get this$u=u(x,t;\epsilon)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\epsilon^n u_n(x,t)$ – 89085731 May 9 '12 at 9:41
Yes, please give me some time and I will add more details in the answer. – Jon May 9 '12 at 10:37
About $u=u(x,t;\epsilon)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\epsilon^n u_n(x,t)$ you will recognize here a power expansion on $\epsilon\gg 1$ that is routinely used in perturbation theory of differential equations. – Jon May 9 '12 at 10:41
Sorry, I meant $\epsilon\ll 1$. – Jon May 9 '12 at 10:41
Another question is that I am thinking whether the perturbation will affect the use of inverse scattering method,that is can we still alter the original problem to the problem of solving out u in the Schrodinger Equation? – 89085731 May 9 '12 at 11:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.