MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does there exist a closed smooth manifold $M$ and a diffeomorphism $f\colon M \to M$ such that:

  1. $f$ is isotopic to the identity,
  2. $f$ is of finite order, $f^n=ID$, and
  3. $f$ is not contained in the image of any circle action, $S^1\to \operatorname{Diff}(M)$?

If the answer is yes, what is an example?

share|cite|improve this question
@Igor this doesn't give you a subgroup because you don't know that you can choose $\gamma_0$ to be a part of a one-parameter subgroup of diffeos. (the exponential map for $Diff_0(M)$ is not onto). – Vitali Kapovitch May 6 '12 at 19:18
What happens if you restrict the $S^1$ action on $S^7$ to $Z/n$ and connect a homotopy sphere to each point in a $Z/n$ orbit? If $n$ divides 28, then the result is a $Z/n$ action on $S^7$ s.t. $f$ is isotopic to the identity, but it doesnt seem likely that the action embeds in an $S^1$ action. – Paul May 6 '12 at 21:35
Another possible example is the following: Start with, say $E_8\oplus E_8$ topological manifold $N^4$, let $M^5=M^4\times S^1$. Then $M^5$ has a smooth structure but no smooth product structure. Now, let $L^5$ be the $2$-fold cover of $M^5$. Let $f: L^5\to L_5$ be the deck-transformation (of order $2$). Then $L^5$ will not have a smooth $S^1$-action containing $f$. The map $f$ is homotopic to the identity. Unfortunately, I do not know enough higher-dimensional topology to conclude if $f$ is also smoothly isotopic to $id$, if it is, then one would get the desired example. – Misha May 7 '12 at 3:54
cf. Corollary 2 of this paper:… I'm not sure though whether the generator of the cyclic group is isotopic to the identity. – Ian Agol May 7 '12 at 5:22
Note that in the topological category, the example exists already for $M=S^3$: Bing constructed finite order homeomorphisms whose fixed-point sets are wild knots, while Raymond proved that the fixed-point set of every nontrivial $S^1$-action on $S^3$ is topologically conjugate to an orthogonal action. – Misha May 7 '12 at 22:02
up vote 18 down vote accepted

Such examples exist in dimension 5, they are contained in the paper by Cameron Gordon "On the higher-dimensional Smith conjecture", Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 29 (1974), 98–110. Namely, Gordon proves in Theorem 5 of this paper that (for every $n\ge 5$) there are infinitely many smooth knots $K=S^{n-2}\subset S^n$ so that $K$ is the fixed-point set of a ${\mathbb Z}_p$-action $\alpha_p$ for every prime $p$. He also proves (Theorem 4) that, given $K$, if every action $\alpha_p$ extends to a circle action on $S^n$ then $\pi_1(S^n\setminus K)\cong {\mathbb Z}$. He then notes (a theorem by Levine) that, for $n\ge 5$, if $\pi_1(S^n\setminus K)\cong {\mathbb Z}$ then $K$ is smoothly unknotted in $S^n$. Since Gordon's theorem 5 yields infinitely many smooth isotopy classes of knots $K$, it then follows for every such (nontrivial) knot, at least for some prime $p$, one of Gordon's actions $\alpha_p$ does not extend to a smooth circle action.

Finally, every diffeomorphism of $S^5$ is PL isotopic to the identity (by the Alexander's trick). Since in dimensions $<7$, PL=DIFF, we conclude that the generator of $\alpha_p({\mathbb Z}_p)$ is smoothly isotopic to the identity.

Lastly, note that in the topological category, the examples exists already for $M=S^3$: Bing ("Inequivalent Families of Periodic Homeomorphisms of $E^3$", Ann. of Math. 80 (1964) 78-93.) constructed finite order homeomorphisms whose fixed-point sets are wild knots, while F.Raymond (Classification of the actions of the circle on $3$-manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (1968) 51-78.) proved that the every $S^1$-action on $S^3$ is topologically conjugate to an orthogonal action.

share|cite|improve this answer
I think you mean $K=S^{n-2} \subset S^n$. – Ian Agol May 8 '12 at 12:48
Of cours, thanks, Ian! – Misha May 8 '12 at 12:59
Dear Misha and all who contributed, Thank you very much for the comments and the answer. This is my first experience with mathoverflow and I have to say it is very positive. THANKS! – Jarek Kedra May 10 '12 at 15:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.